Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 160, Issue 1–2, pp 65–108 | Cite as

Is newspaper coverage of economic events politically biased?

  • John R. LottJr.Email author
  • Kevin A. Hassett
Article

Abstract

This paper develops an econometric technique to test for political bias in news reports that controls for the underlying character of the news reported. Because of the changing availability of the number of newspapers in Nexis/Lexis, two sets of time are examined: from January 1991 to May 2004 and from January 1985 to May 2004. Our results suggest that American newspapers tend to give more positive coverage to the same economic news when Democrats are in the White House than when Republicans are; a similar though smaller effect is found for Democratic control of Congress. Our results reject the claim that “reader diversity is a powerful force toward accuracy.” When all types of news are pooled into a single analysis, our results are significant. However, the results vary greatly depending upon which types of economic data are being reported. When newspapers are examined individually the only support that Republicans appear to obtain is from the president’s home state newspapers during his term. This is true for the Houston Chronicle under both Bushes and the Los Angeles Times during the Reagan administration. Contrary to rational expectations, media coverage affects people’s perceptions of the economy.

Keywords

Media bias Voting Campaigns 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank John Cogan, James Hamilton, Joe Harrington, Larry Kenny, Mark Klamer, Sam Peltzman, Florenz Plassmann, Alex Tabarrok and the participants in seminars at the University of Texas, University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, University of Canterbury (NZ), and the University of Maryland for their comments. Brian Blase, Jill Mitchell, Gordon Gray, Refael Lav, Aarif Morbi, Neil Dutta, Robert Harrison, and Robert Jeffrey for their helpful research assistance.

References

  1. Alterman, E. (2004). What liberal media? The truth about bias and the news. New York: Basic Books. (Reprint edition March 2, 2004).Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, E. L. (2004). “Economy remained strong in 4th quarter, U.S. reports,” New York Times, Saturday, January 31, 2004, 1.Google Scholar
  3. Ansolabehere, S., Lessem, R., & Snyder, J. M, Jr. (2006). The orientation of newspaper endorsements in U.S. elections, 1940–2002. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1(4), 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Associated Press/Ipsos-Public Affairs survey (2004). 1101 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036, June 7–9, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. Baron, D. P. (2006). Persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, J. M., & Allen, M. (2003). “U.S. economic growth surges; output rises at highest rate since 1984, but jobs still decline,” Washington Post, October 31, 2003, p. A1. Google Scholar
  7. Birz, G., & Lott, J. R., Jr. (2011). The effect of macroeconomic news on stock returns: new evidence from newspaper coverage. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2791–2800. co-authored with Gene Birz.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bovitz, G. L., Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2002). When can a news organization lead public opinion? Ideology versus market forces in decisions to make news. Public Choice, 113, 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan, J., & Stone, D. F. (2013). Media proliferation and partisan selective exposure. Public Choice, 156(3–4), 467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiang, C., & Knight, B. (2011). Media bias and influence: Evidence from newspaper endorsements. Review of Economic Studies, 78(3), 795–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coulter, A. (2002). Slander: Liberal lies about the American right. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Croteau, D. (1998). Examining the ‘liberal media’ claim. New York: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. (June).Google Scholar
  13. DellaVigna, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2010). Persuasion: Empirical evidence. Annual Review of Economics, 2(1), 643–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007). The Fox News effect: media bias and voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1187–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 313–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doms, M., & Morin, N. (2004). Consumer sentiment, the economy, and the news media. San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. (July).Google Scholar
  17. Duff, C. (1996). “Factory orders post a 1.3 % jump for December,” Wall Street Journal, Friday, February 16, 1996, A2.Google Scholar
  18. Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2003). The media and asset prices. University of Chicago Business School Working Paper, August 1.Google Scholar
  19. Fields, G. (2004). “Unemployment rate rises,” Miami Herald, Friday, April 2, 2004, p. 1.Google Scholar
  20. Gentzkow, M., Petek, N., Shapiro, J. M. & Sinkinson, M. (2012). Do newspapers serve the state?: Incumbent party influence on the US press, 1869–1928. NBER Working Paper 18164.Google Scholar
  21. Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1), 35–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerber, A., Karlan, D., & Bergan, D. (2009). Does the media matter?: A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions. American Economic Journal, 1(2), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldberg, B. (2001). Bias: A CBS insider exposes how the media distort the news. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Groeling, T., & Kernell, S. (1998). Is network news coverage of the president biased? Journal of Politics, 60(4), 1063–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Groseclose, T., & Milyo, J. (2005). A measure of media bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1191–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hagenbaugh, B. (2003). 7.2% GDP growth fastest in 19 years, USA Today, October 31, 2003, A1.Google Scholar
  27. Hamilton, J. T. (2004). All the news that’s fit to sell: how the market transforms information into news. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ivanovich, D. (2003). “U.S. economy shows biggest rise in years; officials hope improvement spurs new jobs. Houston Chronicle, 31(2003), A1.Google Scholar
  29. Jung, G., Kenny, L. W., & Lott, J. R, Jr. (1994). An explanation for why senators from the same state vote differently so frequently. Journal of Public Economics, 54(1), 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klepper, S., & Leamer, E. E. (1984). Consistent sets of estimators for regression with error is all variables. Econometrica, 52(1), 162–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kohut, A. (2008). “The web: alarming, appealing and a challenge to journalistic values,” Project for Excellence in Journalism, The PEW Research Center, March 17 (http://www.stateofthemedia.org/files/2011/01/Journalist-report-2008.pdf).
  32. Koopmans, T. C. (1937). Linear regression analysis of economic time series. Amsterdam: Econometric Institute Itaarlem—de Erwin F., Bohn NV.Google Scholar
  33. Krupnikov, Y., Lupia, A., & Prior, M. (2006). Public ignorance and estate tax repeal: the effect of partisan differences and survey incentives. National Tax Journal, 59(3), 425–437.Google Scholar
  34. Larcinese, V., Puglisi, R., & Snyder, J. M., Jr. (2011). Partisan bias in economic news: evidence on the agenda-setting behavior of U.S. newspapers. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), 1178–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leamer, E. (1978). Specification searches: ad hoc inference with non experimental data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Leeson, P. T. (2008). Media freedom, political knowledge, and participation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leeson, P. T., & Coyne, C. J. (2005). Manipulating the media. Institutions and Economic Development, 1(2), 67–92.Google Scholar
  38. Lott, J. R., Jr. (1990). An explanation for public provision of schooling: the importance of indoctrination. Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1), 199–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lott, J. R., Jr. (1999). Public schooling, indoctrination, and totalitarianism. Journal of Political Economy, 107(S6), S127–S157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lott, J. R., Jr. (2003). The bias against guns. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Lott, M. (2007). Do media outlets really not provide both sides in news coverage: Re-evaluating Groseclose and Milyo. Working paper.Google Scholar
  42. Media Research Center (1995). MediaWatch: June 1995. 9(6).Google Scholar
  43. Media Research Center. (2004) “The liberal media: every poll shows journalists are more liberal than the American public—and the public knows it. June 30.Google Scholar
  44. Miller, J. P. (2004). “GDP disappoints,” Chicago Tribune, Saturday, January 31, 2004, 1.Google Scholar
  45. Mullainathan, S., & Shleifer, A. (2005). The market for news. American Economic Review, 95(1), 1031–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Neikirk, W. (2003). “GDP aside, jobless rate is number that matters,” Chicago Tribune, October 31, 2003, 1.Google Scholar
  47. Okrent, D. (2004). “Is the New York Times a liberal newspaper?” New York Times, Sunday, July 25, 2004.Google Scholar
  48. Patterson, T. E., & Donsbach, W. (1996). News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political Communication, 13, 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2004a). Survey of journalists. March 10–April 20, 2004.Google Scholar
  50. Porter, E. (2004). “Do newspapers make good news look bad?” New York Times, September 12. D3.Google Scholar
  51. Project for Excellence in Journalism (2004). Character and the campaign: what are the master narratives about the candidates in 2004 and how is the public reacting to them? Project for Excellence in Journalism, Pew Research Center and University of Missouri journalism school.Google Scholar
  52. Puglisi, R. (2011). Being the New York Times: the political behaviour of a newspaper. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11(1), 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Puglisi, R. & Snyder, J. M. Jr. (2011). The balanced U.S. press. NBER Working Paper 17263.Google Scholar
  54. Rasmussen Reports (2008). Belief growing that reporters are trying to help Obama win. Rasmussen Reports, July 21, 2008.Google Scholar
  55. The PEW Research Center (2004b). “Bottom-line pressures now hurting coverage, say journalists,” Project for Excellence in Journalism, May 23, 2004 (http://www.people-press.org/2004/05/23/bottom-line-pressures-now-hurting-coverage-say-journalists/).
  56. San Jose Mercury News. (1996). “Factories break losing streak,” Mercury News Staff writers, the Associated Press, Bloomberg New and Reuters Friday, February 16, C1.Google Scholar
  57. Shapiro, R. (2012) “Money, politics and the press: media political donations to Democrats,” The Huffington Post, September 6, 2012 (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/06/media-political-donations-democrats_n_1855502.html).
  58. Shaw, D. (1985). “Public and the press—two viewpoints,” Los Angeles Times, August 11, A1.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, T. (1988). The vanishing economy. Arlington: The Media Institute.Google Scholar
  60. Tierney, J. (2004). Finding biases on the bus. New York Times, Sunday, August 1, 16.Google Scholar
  61. Van Riper, T. (2004). “Jobs, jobs everywhere,” Daily News (New York), Friday, April 2, 2004, 17.Google Scholar
  62. Wire Reports (1996). “Clinton calls for debate on economic growth, latest round of indicators show marked slowdown in recent months,” Dallas Morning News, Friday, February 16, D1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Crime Prevention Research CenterSwarthmoreUSA
  2. 2.American Enterprise InstituteWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations