Public Choice

, Volume 158, Issue 1–2, pp 51–83 | Cite as

The determinants of election to the United Nations Security Council

  • Axel Dreher
  • Matthew Gould
  • Matthew D. Rablen
  • James Raymond Vreeland
Article

Abstract

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is the foremost international body responsible for the maintenance of international peace and security. Members vote on issues of global importance and consequently receive perks—election to the UNSC predicts, for instance, World Bank and IMF loans. But who gets elected to the UNSC? Addressing this question empirically is not straightforward as it requires a model that allows for discrete choices at the regional and international levels; the former nominates candidates while the latter ratifies them. Using an original multiple discrete choice model to analyze a dataset of 180 elections from 1970 to 2005, we find that UNSC election appears to derive from a compromise between the demands of populous countries to win election more frequently and a norm of giving each country its turn. We also find evidence that richer countries from the developing world win election more often, while involvement in warfare lowers election probability. By contrast, development aid does not predict election.

Keywords

United Nations Security Council Turn-taking norm Elections 

JEL Classification

F53 F55 O19 

References

  1. African Union (2006). Rules of procedure of the AU Ministerial Committee on candidatures within the international system. EX.CL/213 (VIII), Addis Ababa: African Union. Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, S., & Daws, S. (1998). The procedure of the UN Security Council. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bashir, O. S., & Lim, D. J. (2013). Misplaced blame: foreign aid and the consequences of UN Security Council membership. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(3), 509–523. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P., & Walsh, P. (1999). New tools and new tests in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions. Development Research Group, World Bank. Google Scholar
  5. Besley, T., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2011). Do democracies select more educated leaders? American Political Science Review, 105(3), 552–566. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruhn, M., & Gallego, F. A. (2012). Good, bad, and ugly colonial activities: do they matter for economic development? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(2), 433–461. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Smith, A. (2010). The pernicious consequences of UN Security Council membership. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(5), 667–686. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman, T. L. (2011). Securing approval: domestic politics and multilateral authorization for war. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheibub, J., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1–2), 67–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colman, A. M., & Browning, L. (2009). Evolution of cooperative turn-taking. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 11(6), 949–963. Google Scholar
  11. Combs, J. A. (2012). Embargoes and sanctions. In P. Finkelman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the new American nation, Michigan: Gale. Google Scholar
  12. Conway, P. (2007). The revolving door: duration and recidivism in IMF programs. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 205–220. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costa Rica (2005). Note verbale dated 20 July 2005 from the permanent mission of Costa Rica to the United Nations addressed to the secretary-general, A/59/881. New York: United Nations. Google Scholar
  14. Daws, S. (1999). The origins and development of UN electoral groups. In R. Thakur (Ed.), What is equitable geographic representation in the 21st century? (pp. 11–29). Tokyo: United Nations University. Google Scholar
  15. de Vries, C., Steenbergen, M. R., & Hangartner, D. (2009). A choice set modeling approach to EU issue voting. Paper presented at the EUSA conference, Los Angeles. Google Scholar
  16. Dowding, K. M., Goodin, R. E., & Pateman, C. (2004). Justice and democracy: essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dreher, A., & Sturm, J.-E. (2012). Do the IMF and the World Bank influence voting in the UN General Assembly? Public Choice, 151(1–2), 363–397. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dreher, A., & Vreeland, J. R. (2009). Idiosyncratic election to the United Nations Security Council. Working paper. Google Scholar
  19. Dreher, A., Sturm, J.-E., & Vreeland, J. R. (2009a). Development aid and international politics: does membership on the UN Security Council influence World Bank decisions? Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), 1–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dreher, A., Sturm, J.-E., & Vreeland, J. R. (2009b). Global horse trading: IMF loans for votes in the United Nations Security Council. European Economic Review, 53(7), 742–757. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dreher, A., Sturm, J.-E., & Vreeland, J. R. (forthcoming). Does membership on the UN Security Council influence IMF conditionality? Journal of Conflict Resolution. Google Scholar
  22. Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., & Tibshirani, R. (2004). Least angle regression. The Annals of Statistics, 32(2), 407–499. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Estonia (2011). Estonia in the United Nations. Tallinn: Estonian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Available: http://www.vm.ee/?q=en/node/4088.
  24. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferejohn, J., & Rosenbluth, F. M. (2008). Warlike democracies. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(1), 3–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franz, M., van der Post, D., Schülke, O., & Ostner, J. (2011). The evolution of cooperative turn-taking in animal conflict. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11, 323. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glasgow, G., Golder, M., & Golder, S. N. (2012). New empirical strategies for the study of parliamentary government formation. Political Analysis, 20(2), 248–270. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Golder, M., Golder, S. N., & Siegel, D. A. (2012). Modeling the institutional foundations of parliamentary government formation. The Journal of Politics, 74(2), 427–445. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamermesh, D. S., & Schmidt, P. (2003). The determinants of econometric society fellows elections. Econometrica, 71(1), 399–407. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heldt, B. (2008). Personnel contributions to UN peacekeeping operations, 1970–2005. Stockholm: Folke Bernadotte Academy. Google Scholar
  31. Hendel, I. (1999). Estimating multiple-discrete choice models: an application to computerization returns. Review of Economic Studies, 66(2), 423–446. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hollyer, J. R., Rosendorff, B. P., & Vreeland, J. R. (2011). Democracy and transparency. The Journal of Politics, 73(4), 1191–1205. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hosli, M. O., Moody, R., O’Donovan, B., Kaniovski, S., & Little, A. C. H. (2011). Squaring the circle? Collective and distributive effects of United Nations Security Council reform. The Review of International Organizations, 6(2), 163–187. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hurd, I. (2007). After anarchy: legitimacy and power in The UN Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  35. Iwanami, Y. (2012). Delegating the power to govern security affairs: the composition of the UN Security Council. Paper presented at the 5th annual conference on the political economy of international organizations, Villanova. Google Scholar
  36. Iyer, L. (2010). Direct versus indirect colonial rule in India: long-term consequences. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 693–713. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jayakumar, S. (2011). Diplomacy: a Singapore experience. Singapore: Straits Times Press. Google Scholar
  38. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Hague J. Rule Law, 3(2), 220–246. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kilby, C. (2009). The political economy of conditionality: an empirical analysis of World Bank loan disbursements. Journal of Development Economics, 89(1), 51–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kilby, C. (2013). An empirical assessment of informal influence in the World Bank. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 61(2), 431–464. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim, S. Y., & Russett, B. (1996). The new politics of voting alignment in the United Nations General Assembly. International Organization, 50(4), 629–652. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kuziemko, I., & Werker, E. (2006). How much is a seat on the security council worth? Foreign aid and bribery at the United Nations. Journal of Political Economy, 114(5), 905–930. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Levy, P. I. (1999). Sanctions on South Africa: What did they do? Yale University, Economic Growth Center, Center discussion paper No. 796. Google Scholar
  44. Lim, D., & Vreeland, J. R. (2013). Regional organizations and international politics: Japanese influence over the Asian Development Bank and the UN Security Council. World Politics, 65(1), 34–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luck, E. C. (2006). The UN Security Council: practice and promise. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  46. Malone, D. M. (1998). Decision-making in the UN Security Council: the case of Haiti, 1990–1997. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Malone, D. M. (2000). Eyes on the prize: the quest for nonpermanent seats on the UN Security Council. Glob. Gov., 6(1), 3–23. Google Scholar
  48. Manski, C., & Sherman, L. (1980). An empirical analysis of household choice among motor vehicles. Transp. Res., Part a Gen., 14(5–6), 349–366. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McFadden, D. L. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarambeka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  50. Morgan, T. C., Krustev, V., & Bapat, N. A. (2006). Threat and imposition of sanctions (TIES) data user’s manual: case level data. Available: http://www.unc.edu/~bapat/TIES.htm.
  51. New Zealand (2012). United Nations handbook 2012–13. Wellington: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Google Scholar
  52. Nogee, J. L. (2004). Yalta conference. In J. R. Millar (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Russian history (Vol. 4). New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
  53. Potrafke, N. (2009). Does government ideology influence political alignment with the US? An empirical analysis of voting in the UN General Assembly. The Review of International Organizations, 4(3), 245–268. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: political regimes and economic well-being in the world, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rajan, R. G., & Subramanian, A. (2008). Aid and growth: what does the cross-country evidence really show? Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 205–220. Google Scholar
  56. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  57. Reynaud, J., & Vauday, J. (2009). Geopolitics in the international monetary fund. Journal of Development Economics, 89(1), 139–162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Russett, B., & Oneal, J. R. (2001). Triangulating peace: democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: W. W. Norton. Google Scholar
  59. Scharioth, N. (2010). Western democracies in the UN: who gets elected and why—a quantitative examination of elections to United Nations councils and committees. Berlin: Nomos. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schmitz, J., & Schwarze, J. (2012). Behind the scenes—what determines elections of non-permanent members to the UNSC? An empirical analysis. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Conference on the Political Economy of International Organizations, Villanova. Google Scholar
  61. Schwartzberg, J. E. (2003). Entitlement quotients as a vehicle for United Nations reform. Glob. Gov., 9(1), 81–114. Google Scholar
  62. Security Council Report (2009). Special research report no. 1: UN Security Council elections 2009. Security council report, New York. Google Scholar
  63. Security Council Report (2011). Special research report no. 4: Security Council elections 2011. Security council report, New York. Available: www.securitycouncilreport.org.
  64. Serrano, M., & Kenny, P. (2006). Iraq and world order: a Latin American perspective. In R. Thakur & W. P. S. Sidhu (Eds.), The Iraq crisis and world order (pp. 298–314). Tokyo: United Nations University Press. Google Scholar
  65. Stone, R. W. (2002). Lending credibility: the international monetary fund and the post-communist transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Strezhnev, A., & Voeten, E. (2012). United Nations General Assembly voting data. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/12379.
  67. Themnér, L., & Wallensteen, P. (2012). Armed conflicts, 1946–2011. Journal of Peace Research, 49(4), 565–575. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 58(1), 267–288. Google Scholar
  69. UN (2012). United Nations regional groups of member states. New York: UN. Available: http://www.un.org/depts/DGACM/RegionalGroups.shtml.
  70. USAID (2011). U.S. overseas loans and grants: obligations and loan authorizations.USAID, Washington. Available: http://gbk.eads.usaidallnet.gov/about/.
  71. Voeten, E. (2000). Clashes in the Assembly. International Organization, 54(2), 185–215. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Voeten, E. (2001). Outside options and the logic of Security Council action. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 845–858. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zacher, M. W. (2004). The conundrums of international power sharing. In R. M. Price & M. W. Zacher (Eds.), The United Nations and global security (pp. 211–225). New York: Palgrave Press. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Axel Dreher
    • 1
  • Matthew Gould
    • 2
  • Matthew D. Rablen
    • 3
  • James Raymond Vreeland
    • 4
  1. 1.Heidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.University of WestminsterLondonUK
  3. 3.Brunel UniversityLondonUK
  4. 4.Georgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations