Public Choice

, Volume 160, Issue 3–4, pp 391–409 | Cite as

Immigration, redistribution, and universal suffrage

Article

Abstract

The effect of immigration on redistribution has been widely debated. This paper contributes to this debate by testing two explanations, which are that (i) immigration tends to reduce redistribution due to people’s higher levels of xenophobia, and that (ii) immigration affects redistribution because immigrants do not have the right to vote. Since the demand for redistribution depends on the (expected) gap between median voter income and mean income, immigrants affect the demand for redistribution because, as non-citizens, they do not change the median voter’s income, but, as economic stakeholders, they do affect the mean income. Four empirical consequences of (i) and (ii) are tested at the individual level. Evidence from the European Values Survey in 45 countries confirms (ii), showing that immigrants’ expected competitiveness on the labor market affects preferences for redistribution and that it is amplified when the perceived number of immigrants is high. In contrast, (i) is globally rejected since the impact of the citizens’ declared level of solidarity with immigrants tends to be weak and depends on the type of measurement or specification used.

Keywords

Immigration Redistribution Universal suffrage Xenophobia Median voter Public opinion 

References

  1. Aalberg, T. (2003). Achieving justice: comparative public opinion on income distribution. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail. New York: Random House. Google Scholar
  3. Aidt, T. S., & Dallal, B. (2008). Female voting power: the contribution of women’s suffrage to the growth of social spending in western Europe (1869–1960). Public Choice, 134, 391–417. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aidt, T. S., & Jensen, P. S. (2009). The taxman tools up. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 160–175. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aidt, T. S., Dutta, J., & Loukoianovac, E. (2006). Democracy comes to Europe: franchise extension and fiscal outcomes. European Economic Review, 50, 249–283. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. L. (2004). Fighting poverty in the U.S. and in Europe: a world of difference. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 897–931. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B. (2001). Why doesn’t the U.S. have a European-style welfare system? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 32(2), 187–278. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benabou, R., & Ok, E. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 447–487. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blekesaune, M., & Quadagno, J. (2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: a comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 415–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2000). Reciprocity, self-interest and the welfare state. Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 30, 33–53. Google Scholar
  12. Bradley, D., Huber, E., Moller, S., Nielsen, F., & Stephens, J. D. (2003). Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies. World Politics, 55, 193–228. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cusack, T., Iversen, T., & Rehm, P. (2006). Risk at work: the demand and supply sides of government redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(3), 365–389. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Amuri, F., Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. (2010). The labor market impact of immigration in western Germany in the 1990s. European Economic Review, 54, 550–570. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eger, M. A. (2010). Even in Sweden: the effect of immigration on support for welfare state spending. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 203–217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finseraas, H. (2008). Immigration and preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis of European survey data. Comparative European Politics, 6(4), 407–431. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finseraas, H. (2009). Income inequality and demand for redistribution. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(1), 94–119. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Georgiadis, A., & Manning, A. (2012). Spend it like Beckham? Inequality and redistribution in the UK, 1983–2004. Public Choice, 151(3–4), 537–563. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: race, media, and the politics of anti-poverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Givens, T. E. (2004). The radical right gender gap. Comparative Political Studies, 37(1), 30–54. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Habyarimana, J., Humphreys, M., Posner, D. D., & Weinstein, J. M. (2007). Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision? American Political Science Review, 101(4), 709–725. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2010). Attitudes toward highly skilled and low-skilled immigration: evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 61–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen, J. D. (2003). Immigration and income redistribution in welfare states. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 735–746. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hochman, H. M., & Rodgers, J. D. (1969). Pareto optimal redistribution. The American Economic Review, 59, 542–557. Google Scholar
  25. Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100, 165–181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. James, E. (1993). Why do different countries choose a different public-private mix of educational services? The Journal of Human Resources, 28(3), 571–592. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keely, L. C., & Tan, C. M. (2008). Understanding preferences for income redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 944–961. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenworthy, L. (2009). The effect of public opinion on social policy generosity. Socio-Economic Review, 7(4), 727–740. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kenworthy, L., & McCall, L. (2008). Inequality, public opinion, and redistribution. Socio-Economic Review, 6, 35–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lind, J. T. (2007). Fractionalization and the size of government. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 51–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2006). The fallacy of “job robbing”: a meta-analysis of estimates of the effect of immigration on employment. Journal of Migration & Refugee, 1, 131–151. Google Scholar
  32. Lott, J. R., & Kenny, L. W. (1999). Did women’s suffrage change the size and scope of government? Journal of Political Economy, 107, 1163–1198. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lübker, M. (2007). Inequality and the demand for redistribution: are the assumptions of the new growth theory valid? Socio-Economic Review, 5, 117–148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luttmer, E. F. (2001). Group loyalty and the taste for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 109(3), 500–528. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mayda, A. M. (2006). Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 510–530. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mayr, K. (2007). Immigration and income redistribution: a political economy analysis. Public Choice, 131(1–2), 101–116. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 914–927. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moene, K. O., & Wallerstein, M. (2003). Earnings inequality and welfare spending: a disaggregated analysis. World Politics, 55, 485–516. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mueller, D. C., & Murrell, M. (1986). Interest groups and the size of government. Public Choice, 48(2), 125–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Rourke, K. H., & Sinnott, R. (2004). The determinants of individual attitudes towards immigration. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 838–861. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Plümper, T., & Martin, C. W. (2003). Democracy, spending, and economic growth: a political-economic explanation of the Barro-effect. Public Choice, 117, 27–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Razin, A., Sadka, E., & Swagel, P. (2002). Tax burden and migration: a political economic theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 167–190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106, 997–1032. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roemer, J. E., Lee, W., & Van der Straeten, K. (2007). Racism, xenophobia and redistribution, a study of multi-issue politics in advanced democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press/Russell Sage Foundation Press. Google Scholar
  46. Schmidt, T. D., & Jensen, P. S. (2012). Foreign labor and regional labor markets: aggregate and disaggregate impact on growth and wages in Danish regions. (Forthcoming) Annals of Regional Science. Google Scholar
  47. Senik, C., Stichnoth, H., & Van der Straeten, K. (2009). Immigration and natives’ attitudes towards the welfare state: evidence from the European social survey. Social Indicators Research, 91(3), 345–370. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simon, R. J., & Lynch, J. P. (1999). A comparative assessment of public opinion toward immigrants and immigration policies. The International Migration Review, 33(2), 455–467. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Soroka, S., Banting, K., & Johnston, R. (2006). Immigration and redistribution in a global era. In B. Sam, P. Bardhan, & M. Wallerstein (Eds.), Globalization and egalitarian redistribution (pp. 261–288). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  50. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vasileva, K. (2011). 6.5 % of the EU population are foreigners and 9.4 % are born abroad. Population and social conditions. EUROSTAT, Stat. Focus 34 Google Scholar
  52. Van Der Brug, W., & Van Spanje, W. (2009). Immigration, Europe and the ‘new’ cultural dimension. European Journal of Political Research, 48, 309–334. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Oorschot, W. (2008). Solidarity towards immigrants in European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 3–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science Po Grenoble, PACTE, Department of Political ScienceGrenoble UniversityGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations