Public Choice

, Volume 153, Issue 3–4, pp 495–502 | Cite as

Tolerance and growth: modeling the empirical relationship

REPLY FROM

Abstract

We showed, in Berggren and Elinder (2012), that tolerance toward homosexuals is negatively and quite robustly related to economic growth. In a comment, Bornhoff and Lee (this issue) question this finding on model-specification grounds. By undertaking three changes, they purport to show that our main result does not hold. In this article, we demonstrate that one of these changes is inconsequential (replacing GDP per capita by its logarithm in controlling for conditional convergence) and argue that two of them are questionable. First, the removal of certain central control variable risks introducing omitted variable bias and inconsistent estimates. Second, regional dummy variables are added on arbitrary grounds. For example, by using regional dummy variables that are just as reasonable as the Baltic dummy used by Bornhoff and Lee, we find that significance for tolerance toward homosexuals reappears in our empirical model. In all, this implies that there are good grounds for considering the negative relationship between tolerance towards homosexuals and growth valid, Bornhoff and Lee’s claims notwithstanding.

Keywords

Tolerance Growth Diversity 

JEL Classification

O40 Z13 

References

  1. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berggren, N., & Elinder, M. (2012). Is tolerance good or bad for growth? Public Choice, 150(1–2), 283–308. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bornhoff, E. J., & Lee, G. H. Y. (this issue). Tolerance and economic growth revisited: a note. Public Choice. doi:10.1007/s11127-012-0022-1.
  4. Durlauf, S. N., Johnson, P. A., & Temple, J. R. W. (2005). Growth econometrics. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth: volume 1A (pp. 555–677). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glaeser, E. L. (2005). Review of Richard Florida’s the rise of the creative class. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(5), 593–596. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessman, L. (2008). The role of cognitive skills in economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(3), 607–668. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sala-i-Martín, X., Doppelhofer, G., & Miller, R. I. (2004). Determinants of long-term growth: a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates. American Economic Review, 94(4), 813–835. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Temple, J. (1999). The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 112–156. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. Economic Journal, 111(470), 295–321. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute of Industrial EconomicsStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of Institutional Economics, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of Economics in PraguePragueCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  4. 4.Research Institute of Industrial EconomicsStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations