Public Choice

, Volume 159, Issue 1–2, pp 105–120

The welfare state, migration, and voting rights



This paper proposes a political economic analysis of public opinion in European Union countries toward migrants from poor countries. By focusing on redistributive policy, the analysis sheds light on specific determinants of public opinion. The theoretical analysis, based on the median voter framework, shows that one of the key variables affecting public opinion is the voting rights of migrants. Where migrants do not have the right to vote, their presence negatively impacts the poorest natives. In countries where migrants enjoy voting rights, they are able to vote on redistributive policy; therefore, the impact of migration on natives’ welfare is fundamentally different. After the theoretical analysis, the paper proposes an empirical analysis of Europeans’ attitudes toward non-Western migrants in European Union countries. This empirical analysis confirms the decisive impact of migrants’ voting rights. It shows that, in EU countries, the more educated natives are significantly less favorable to migrants from poor countries when the latter have the right to vote.


Migration Voting rights Redistributive policy Opinion toward migrants Political economy 

JEL Classification

D72 H1 F22 J61 


  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2000). Why did the West extend the franchise? Democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1167–1199. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrès, H. (2007). Le droit de vote des étrangers—etat des lieux et fondements théoriques. Thèse pour le doctorat de sciences juridiques et politiques, Université de Paris 7. Google Scholar
  3. Bach, S., Blöchliger, H., & Wallau, D. (2009). The spending power of sub-central governments: a pilot study (Working Papers 705). OECD Economics Department. OECD Publishing, July. Google Scholar
  4. Basuchoudhary, A., & Shughart, W. F. (2010). On ethnic conflict and the origins of transnational terrorism. Defence and Peace Economics, 21(1), 65–87. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodvarsson, O. B., & Van den Berg, H. (2009). The economics of migration—theory and policy. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  6. Boex, J., & Simatupang, R. R. (2008). Fiscal decentralisation and empowerment: evolving concepts and alternative measures. Fiscal Studies, 29(4), 435. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borge, L.-E., Brueckner, J. K., & Rattsø, J. (2012). Partial fiscal decentralization and public-sector heterogeneity: theory and evidence from Norway (Technical report). Norwegian, University of Science and Technology Working Paper. Google Scholar
  8. Borjas, G. J. (1999). Immigration and welfare magnets. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(4), 607–637. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Citrin, J., Green, D. P., Muste, C., & Wong, C. (1997). Public opinion toward immigration reform: the role of economic motivations. The Journal of Politics, 59(03), 858–881. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cremer, H., & Pestieau, P. (1998). Social insurance, majority voting and labor mobility. Journal of Public Economics, 68(3), 397–420. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Docquier, F., Lohest, O., & Marfouk, A. (2007). Brain drain in developing countries. World Bank Economic Review, 21(2), 193–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dustmann, C., & Preston, I. (2001). Attitudes to ethnic minorities, ethnic context and location decisions. Economic Journal, 111(470), 353–373. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Epple, D., & Romer, T. (1991). Mobility and redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 99(4), 828–858. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Facchini, G., & Mayda, A. M. (2006). Individual attitudes towards immigrants: welfare-state determinants across countries. SSRN eLibrary. Google Scholar
  15. Facchini, G., & Mayda, A. M. (2009). Does the welfare state affect individual attitudes toward immigrants? Evidence across countries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(2), 295–314. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedberg, R. M., & Jennifer, H. (1995). The impact of immigrants on host country wages, employment and growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 23–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2007). Educated preferences: explaining attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International Organization, 61(2), 399–442. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanson, G. H. (2008). The economic consequences of the international migration of labor (Working Paper 14490). National Bureau of Economic Research, November. Google Scholar
  19. Haupt, A., & Peters, W. (1998). Public pensions and voting on immigration. Public Choice, 95(3), 403–413. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kerr, S. P., & Kerr, W. R. (2011). Economic impacts of immigration: a survey (Working Paper 16736). National Bureau of Economic Research, January. Google Scholar
  21. Le Maux, B., Rocaboy, Y., & Goodspeed, T. (2011). Political fragmentation, party ideology and public expenditures. Public Choice, 147(1), 43–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mayda, A. M. (2006). Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(3), 510–530. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mayr, K. (2007). Immigration and income redistribution: a political economy analysis. Public Choice, 131(1), 101–116. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mazza, I., & Winden, F. (1996). A political economic analysis of labor migration and income redistribution. Public Choice, 88(3), 333–363. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914–927. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nannestad, P. (2007). Immigration and welfare states: a survey of 15 years of research. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 512–532. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120–1149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Okkerse, L. (2008). How to measure labour market effects of immigration: a review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 1–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Rourke, K. H., & Sinnott, R. (2006). The determinants of individual attitudes towards immigration. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(4), 838–861. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peracchi, F., & Depalo, D. (2006). Labor market outcomes of natives and immigrants: evidence from the ECHP (Working Paper 615). The World Bank. Google Scholar
  31. Powell, B. (2012). Coyote ugly: the deadweight cost of rent seeking for immigration policy. Public Choice, 150(1), 195–208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Razin, A., & Sadka, E. (2004). Welfare migration: is the net fiscal burden a good measure of its economic impact on the welfare of the native born population? (Working Paper 10682). National Bureau of Economic Research, August. Google Scholar
  33. Razin, A., Sadka, E., & Swagel, P. (2002). Tax burden and migration: a political economy theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 167–190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rother, P. C., Catenaro, M., & Schwab, G. (2003). Ageing and pensions in the Euro area survey and projection results (Social Protection Discussion Papers 25986). The World Bank. Google Scholar
  35. Scheve, K. F., & Slaughter, M. J. (2001). Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(1), 133–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scholten, U., & Thum, M. (1996). Public pensions and immigration policy in a democracy. Public Choice, 87, 347–361. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strudel, S. (2003). Polyrythmie européenne: le droit de suffrage municipal des étrangers au sein de l’Union, une règle électorale entre détournements et retardements. Revue Française de Science Politique, 53(1), 3–34. Google Scholar
  38. Sénat (2005). Le droit de vote des étrangers aux élections locales. Etude de législation comparée, n218, 30 novembre 2011. Google Scholar
  39. Söllner, F. (1999). A note on the political economy of immigration. Public Choice, 100, 245–251. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thum, M. (2004). Controlling migration in an open labor market. Public Choice, 119(3), 425–443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valenty, L. O., & Sylvia, R. D. (2004). Thresholds for tolerance: the impact of racial and ethnic population composition on the vote for California propositions 187 and 209. The Social Science Journal, 41(3), 433–446. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vasileva, K. (2011). 6.5 % of the EU population are foreigners and 9.4 % are born abroad. Population and social conditions—statistics in focus 34, Eurostat. Google Scholar
  43. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CITERES, UMR 7324University of ToursTours Cedex 3France

Personalised recommendations