Decision costs in legislative bargaining: an experimental analysis
- 334 Downloads
We conduct an experiment to assess the effects of different decision rules on the costs of decision making in a multilateral bargaining situation. Specifically, we compare the amount of costly delay observed in an experimental bargaining game under majority and unanimity rule. Our main finding is that individual subjects are more likely to reject offers under unanimity rule. This higher rejection rate, as well as the requirement that all subjects agree, leads to more costly delay. This result provides empirical support for a classic argument in favor of less-than-unanimity decision rules put forth by Buchanan and Tullock (The calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1962).
KeywordsCollective decision-making Majority rule Unanimity Legislative bargaining Experimental economics
JEL ClassificationC78 C92 D71 D72
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
- Diermeier, D., & Morton, R. (2005). Proportionality versus perfectness: experiments in majoritarian bargaining. In D. Austen-Smith & J. Duggan (Eds.), Social choice and strategic behavior: essays in honor of Jeffrey S. Banks (pp. 201–226). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
- Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In K. Kremer & V. Macho (Eds.), Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003. GWDG Bericht 63. Ges. für Wiss. Datenverarbeitung (pp. 79–93). Göttingen: Gesellschaft fuer Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung. Google Scholar
- McKelvey, R. D. (1991). An experimental test of a stochastic game model of committee bargaining. In T. R. Palfrey (Ed.), Laboratory research in political economy (pp. 139–168). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
- Selten, R. (1967). Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments. In H. Sauermann (Ed.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung (Vol. I, pp. 136–168). Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck). Google Scholar