Public Choice

, Volume 152, Issue 1–2, pp 203–210 | Cite as

Gordon Tullock’s contributions to bioeconomics

Article

Abstract

This article discuss Gordon Tullock’s contributions to bioeconomics: His contributions to the bioeconomics of non-human societies, his impact on second and third generation bioeconomists, and the founding of the Journal of Bioeconomics.

Keywords

Coal tits Bees Ants Evolutionary ecology Group selection Journal of Bioeconomics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G. S. (1976). Altruism, egoism, and genetic fitness. Economics and sociobiology. Journal of Economic Literature, 14(3), 817–826. Google Scholar
  2. Bergstrom, C. T., & Bergstrom, T. C. (1999). Does mother nature punish rotten kids? Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 47–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan, J. M. (2000). Group selection and team sports. Journal of Bioeconomics, 2(1), 1–7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassill, D. (2003). Skew selection: nature favors a trickle-down distribution of resources in ants. Journal of Bioeconomics, 5(2 & 3), 83–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charnov, E. (1976). Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9, 129–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charnov, E. (1990). The economy of nature and the nature of economics. Unpublished manuscript. Google Scholar
  7. Cordes, C. (2004). The human adaptation for culture and its behaviorial implications. Journal of Bioeconomics, 6(2), 143–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corning, P. A. (2000). Biological adaptation in human species: a “basic needs” approach. Journal of Bioeconomics, 2(1), 41–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demsetz, H. (2009). Seemingly altruistic behavior: selfish genes or cooperative organisms. Journal of Bioeconomics, 11(3), 211–221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emlen, J. M. (1966). The role of time and energy in food preference. American Naturalist, 101, 385–389. Google Scholar
  11. Gibb, J. (1958). Predation by tits and squirrels on the eucosmid Ernarmonie conicolana. Journal of Animal Ecology, 27, 375–396. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghiselin, M. T. (1999). Progress and the economy of nature. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 35–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghiselin, M. T. (2005). Comments on Robert Yarbrough’s ‘teaching bioeconomics’. Journal of Bioeconomics, 7(1), 39–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gifford, A. Jr. (1999). Being and time: on the nature and the evolution of institutions. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(2), 127–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gowdy, J. (2006). Evolutionary theory and economic policy with reference to sustainability. Journal of Bioeconomics, 8(1), 1–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirshleifer, J. (1999). There are many evolutionary pathways to cooperation. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 73–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodgson, G. (2007). Taxonomizing the relationship between biology and economics: a very long engagement. Journal of Bioeconomics, 9(2), 169–185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lack, D. (1966). Population studies of birds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  19. Landa, J. T. (1986). The political economy of swarming in honeybees: voting-with-the wings, decision-making costs, and the unanimity rule. Public Choice, 51, 25–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Landa, J. T. (1999). Bioeconomics of some nonhuman and human societies: new institutional economics approach. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 95–113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Landa, J. T. (2008). The bioeconomics of homogeneous middleman groups as adaptive units: theory and empirical evidence from a group selection framework. J. T. Landa & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), Special issue: Group selection: theory and evidence. Journal of Bioeconomics, 10(3), 259–278. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Landa, J. T. (2009). Editor-in-Chief’s farewell: editing the Journal of Bioeconomics, 1999–2009. Journal of Bioeconomics, 11(3), 207–210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Landa, J. T., & Ghiselin, M. T. (1999). The emerging discipline of bioeconomics: aims and scope of the Journal of Bioeconomics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 5–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Landa, J. T., & Tullock, G. (2003). Why ants do but honeybees do not construct satellite nests. Journal of Bioeconomics, 5(2 & 3), 151–164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Landa, J. T., & Wallis, A. (1988). Socio-economic organization of honeybee colonies. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 2, 353–363. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. American Naturalist, 100, 603–609. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Metcalfe, J. S. (2002). On the optimality of the competitive process: Kimura’s theorem and market dynamics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 4(2), 109–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parker, G. A. (2006). Behavioural ecology: natural history as science. In J. R. Lucas & L. W. Simmons (Eds.), Essays in animal behaviour. Celebrating 50 years of animal behaviour (pp. 23–56). Burlington: Elsevier. Google Scholar
  29. Pryor, F. (2003). What does it mean to be human? A comparison of primate economies. Journal of Bioeconomics, 5(2 & 3), 97–146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rubin, P. H. (2000). Group selection and the limits to altruism. Journal of Bioeconomics, 2(1), 9–23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tullock, G. (1971). The coal tit as a careful shopper. American Naturalist, 105(941), 77–80. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tullock, G. (1977). Economics and sociobiology: a comment. Journal of Economic Literature, 15(2), 502–506. Google Scholar
  33. Tullock, G. (1993). The economics of non-human societies. Tucson: Pallas Press. Google Scholar
  34. Tullock, G. (1999). Some personal reflections on the history of bioeconomics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 13–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vermeij, G. J. (2009). Comparative economics: evolution and the modern economy. Journal of Bioeconomics, 11(2), 105–134. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vromen, J. (2010). Allusions to evolution: edifying evolutionary biology rather than economic theory. In R. van Horn, P. Mirowski & T. Stapleford (Eds.), Building Chicago economics: new perspectives on the history of America’s most powerful economics program (pp. 208–236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  37. Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: the unity of knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knoff. Google Scholar
  38. Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82(4), 328–348. Google Scholar
  39. Witt, U. (1999). Bioeconomics as economics from a Darwinian perspective. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 19–34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yarbrough, B. V., & Yarbrough, R. M. (1999). Governance structures, insider status, and boundary maintenance. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(3), 289–310. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yarbrough, R. M., (2005). Teaching bioeconomics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 7(1), 1–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zak, P. J., & Park, K. W. (2002). Population genetics and economic growth. Journal of Bioeconomics, 4(1), 1–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Faculty of Liberal Arts & Professional StudiesYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations