The productivity of elected and appointed officials: the case of school superintendents
For over 40 years researchers have attempted to test the relative efficiency of governments run by elected versus appointed officials with conflicting results. The focus of prior research has been the expenditure levels of municipal and county governments. In this paper, we consider the achievement of students in public schools. Using data from Florida’s 67 school districts, we compare academic outcomes of students in districts run by elected and appointed superintendents. To overcome selection bias, we utilize both instrumental variable methods and panel data techniques. We find no consistent differences in the performance of elected and appointed superintendents.
KeywordsElection method Efficiency
- Besley, T., & Payne, A. (2005). Implementation of anti-discrimination policy: does judicial selection matter? (LSE STICERD Research Paper No. PEPP04). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1158326.
- Booms, B. H. (1966). City governmental form and public expenditure levels. National Tax Journal, 19(2), 187–198. Google Scholar
- Coate, S., & Knight, B. (2009). Government form and public spending: evidence from U.S. municipalities (NBER Working Paper 14857). Available at 14857 http://www.nber.org/papers/w14857.
- Enikolopov, R. (2010). Politicians, bureaucrats and targeted redistribution: the role of career concerns. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=945274.
- French, P. E. (2004). Form of government and per capita expenditures: an evaluation of small cities and towns. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 16(2), 13–209. Google Scholar
- Harris, D., Sass, T., & Semykina, A. (2010). Value-added models and the measurement of teacher productivity (CALDER Working Paper No. 54). December 2010. Google Scholar
- Hoffman, R. G., Wise, L. L., & Thacker, A. A. (2001). Florida comprehensive assessment test: technical report on vertical scaling for reading and mathematics. Available at http://fcat.fldoe.org/pdf/01TechRptVerticalScaling.pdf.
- Kreft, S. F. (2007). An efficiency comparison of city managers and elected mayors (Working Paper No 2007-02). Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy. Google Scholar
- Nichols, A. (2007). Causal inference with observational data. Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, 7(4), 507–541. Google Scholar
- Schuh, J., & Herrington, C. (1990). Electing versus appointing district superintendents of schools. Southeastern Educational Improvement Lab., Research Triangle Park, NC. Google Scholar
- Sello, J. (1987). Florida’s approach to the selection of school superintendents: perceptions of board members and administrators in selected school districts. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from Florida Atlantic University (Order number 8724507). Google Scholar
- Vlaicu, R. (2008). Executive performance under direct and hierarchical accountability structures: theory and evidence. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1051661.
- Whalley, A. (2010). Elected versus appointed policymakers: evidence from city treasurers (NBER Working Paper 15643). Available at NBER: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15643.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar