Public Choice

, Volume 154, Issue 1–2, pp 59–73 | Cite as

The politics of digits: evidence of odd taxation

Article

Abstract

From the concept of odd pricing, i.e., setting rightmost price digits below a whole number, this paper advances the political counterpart of odd taxation using a panel of Danish municipal taxes. First, the distribution of tax decimals is non-uniform and resembles the distribution of price-endings data. Second, nine-ending and other higher-end decimals are found to be over-represented which echoes odd pricing research. It suggests that incumbents take voters’ biases into account and apply odd taxes to minimize the political costs of taxation while maximizing revenue. Attention should be given to how policy digits are arranged to exploit voters’ cognitive biases.

Keywords

Tax policy Cognitive biases Policy digits Incumbent behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. D. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. T., & Simester, D. I. (2003). Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales: evidence from field experiments. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 1(1), 93–110. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashworth, J., Heyndels, B., & Smolders, C. (2003). Psychological taxing in Flemish municipalities. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(6), 741–762. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benford, F. (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78(4), 551–572. Google Scholar
  5. Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. The American Economic Review, 85(1), 25–45. Google Scholar
  6. Bizer, G. Y., & Schindler, R. M. (2005). Direct evidence of ending-digit drop-off in price information processing. Psychology and Marketing, 22(10), 771–783. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blom-Hansen, J. (1999). Avoiding the ‘joint-decision trap’: lesons from intergovernmental relations in Scandinavia. European Journal of Political Research, 35(1), 35–67. Google Scholar
  8. Brenner, G. A., & Brenner, R. (1982). Memory and markets, or why are you paying $2.99 for a widget? The Journal of Business, 55(1), 147–158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunell, T. L., & Glazer, A. (2001). Rational response to irrational attitudes: the level of the gasoline tax in the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 20(4), 761–764. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carslaw, C. A. P. N. (1988). Anomalies in income numbers: evidence of goal oriented behavior. The Accounting Review, 63(2), 321–327. Google Scholar
  11. Chetty, R., Looney, A., & Kroft, K. (2009). Salience and taxation: theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1145–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christensen, J. G. (2000). The dynamics of decentralization and recentralization. Public Administration, 78(2), 389–408. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coulter, K. S. (2001). Odd-ending price underestimation: an experimental examination of left-to-right processing effects. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(5), 276–292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edmark, K., & Agren, H. (2008). Identifying strategic interactions in Swedish local income tax policies. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(3), 849–857. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finkelstein, A. (2009). E-ZTAX: tax salience and tax rates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 969–1010. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiva, J., & Rattsø, J. (2007). Local choice of property taxation: evidence from Norway. Public Choice, 132(3), 457–470. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frey, B. S., & Eichenberger, R. (1991). Anomalies in political economy. Public Choice, 68(1), 71–89. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gedenk, K., & Sattler, H. (1999). The impact of price thresholds on profit contribution—should retailers set 9-ending prices? Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 33–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hales, D. N., Chakravorty, S. S., & Sridharan, V. (2009). Testing Benford’s Law for improving supply chain decision-making: a field experiment. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(2), 606–618. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris, L. (1991). Stock price clustering and discreteness. The Review of Financial Studies, 4(3), 399–415. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, T. P. (1995). A statistical derivation of the significant-digit law. Statistical Science, 10(4), 354–363. Google Scholar
  22. Knauth, O. (1949). Considerations in the setting of retail prices. The Journal of Marketing, 14(1), 1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krishna, A., & Slemrod, J. (2003). Behavioral public finance: tax design as price presentation. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(2), 189–203. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCaffery, E. J. (1994). The UCLA tax policy conference: cognitive theory and tax. UCLA Law Review, 41, 1861–1947. Google Scholar
  25. McCaffery, E. J., & Baron, J. (2006). Thinking about tax. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12(1), 106–135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  27. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ministry of Interior (1984). The municipal tax law [Bekendtgørelse af lov om kommunal indkomstskat]. Copenhagen: Indenrigsministeriet. Google Scholar
  29. Moulton, B. (1990). An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(2), 334–338. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newcomb, S. (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4(1), 38–39. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niederhoffer, V. (1965). Clustering of stock prices. Operations Research, 13(2), 258–265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nigrini, M. (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s Law. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18, 72–91. Google Scholar
  33. Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rattsø, J. (2004). Local tax financing in the Nordic countries. Working paper, ‘Economic General Report’ for the 2004 Nordic Tax Research Council meeting in Oslo. Google Scholar
  35. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 532–547. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralisation as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3(2), 24–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J. R. (2005). Testing the Mill Hypothesis of fiscal illusion. Public Choice, 122(1/2), 39–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schindler, R. (1996). Increased consumer sales response though use of 99-ending prices. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 187–199. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schindler, R., & Wiman, A. R. (1989). Effects of odd pricing on price recall. Journal of Business Research, 19(3), 165–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schindler, R. M., & Chandrashekaran, R. (2004). Influence of price endings on price recall: a by-digit analysis. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(7), 514–524. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schindler, R. M., & Kirby, P. N. (1997). Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: implications for nine-ending effects. The Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 192–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stiving, M., & Winer, R. S. (1997). An empirical analysis of price endings with scanner data. The Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 57–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suri, R., Anderson, R., & Kotlov, V. (2004). The use of 9-ending prices: contrasting the USA with Poland. European Journal of Marketing, 38(1/2), 56–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tepe, M., & Vanhuysse, P. (2009). Educational business cycles. Public Choice, 139(1), 61–82. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2005). Penny Wise and pound foolish: the left-digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 32(1), 54–64. Google Scholar
  47. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Twedt, D. W. (1965). Does the “9 Fixation” in retail pricing really promote sales? The Journal of Marketing, 29(4), 54–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Veiga, L., & Veiga, F. (2007). Political business cycles at the municipal level. Public Choice, 131(1), 45–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yule, G. U. (1927). On reading a scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 90(3), 570–587. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Political ScienceUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark

Personalised recommendations