Public Choice

, Volume 145, Issue 1–2, pp 57–79 | Cite as

Do state balanced budget requirements matter? Testing two explanatory frameworks

  • Yilin HouEmail author
  • Daniel L. Smith


Balanced budget requirements (BBRs) affect all aspects of financial operations. Previous studies relied on characterizations that highlight a constitutional-statutory distinction. Hou and Smith (Public Budgeting & Finance 26(3):22–45, 2006) instead propose a political-technical construct. This article uses probit estimation, six measures of balance, and long panels to test which framework offers more explanatory power. The findings suggest that BBRs matter to varying degrees. Technical requirements exert bigger effects than political ones, the effects are more obvious on narrower than broader measures of balance and in the later phases of the budget cycle, and the political-technical construct offers more explanatory power than the constitutional-statutory distinction.


Budgeting Institutions Fiscal policy Balanced budget requirements 

JEL Classification

H7 H71 H72 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrams, B., & Dougan, W. (1986). The effects of constitutional restraints on governmental spending. Public Choice, 49, 101–116. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) (1987). Fiscal discipline in the federal system: experience of the states. Washington, DC. Google Scholar
  3. Bohn, H., & Inman, R. P. (1996). Balanced-budget rules and public deficits: evidence from the U.S. states. Paper read at Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. Google Scholar
  4. Briffault, R. (1996). Balancing acts: the reality behind state balanced budget requirements. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund Press. Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
  6. Calcagno, P. T., & Escaleras, M. (2007). Party alternation, divided government, and fiscal performance within U.S. states. Economics of Governance, 8(2), 111–128. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaney, B. A., Copley, P. A., & Stone, M. S. (2002). The effect of fiscal stress and balanced budget requirements on the funding and measurement of state pension obligations. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21, 287–313. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coupé, T. (2005). Bias in conditional and unconditional fixed effects logit estimation: a correction. Political Analysis, 13(3), 292–295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forrester, J. P. (1991). Multi-year forecasting and municipal budgeting. Public Budgeting & Finance, 11(2), 47–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hou, Y. (2003). What stabilizes state general fund expenditures in downturn years—budget stabilization fund or general fund unreserved undesignated balance? Public Budgeting & Finance, 23(3), 64–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hou, Y. (2006). Stages of budgetary development—A socio-economic model on the development of public budgeting, paper prepared for presentation at the annual conference of the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA), 1–4 April 2006, Denver, Colorado. Available at SSRN:
  12. Hou, Y. (2007). The rise and decline of the norm of budget balance, paper presented at the conference of the Association for Budgeting and Financial Management (ABFM), 25–27 October 2007, Washington, DC. Available at
  13. Hou, Y., & Smith, D. L. (2006). A framework for understanding state balanced budget requirement systems: re-examining distinctive features and an operational definition. Public Budgeting & Finance, 26(3), 22–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katz, E. (2001). Bias in conditional and unconditional fixed effects logit estimation. Political Analysis, 9(4), 379–384. Google Scholar
  15. Levinson, A. (1998). Balanced budgets and business cycles: evidence from the states. National Tax Journal, 51(4), 715–732. Google Scholar
  16. Mullins, D. R., & Wallin, B. A. (2004). Tax and expenditure limitations: introduction and overview. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(4), 2–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO) (1992a). State balanced budget requirements: provisions and practice. Washington, DC. Google Scholar
  18. National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO) (1992b). Budget processes in the states. Washington, DC. 1992, 1995, 1997, 1999 and 2002 editions. Google Scholar
  19. National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO) (1997). Budgetary processes in the states. Washington, DC. 1977, 1981, 1987 and 1989 editions. Google Scholar
  20. Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Poterba, J. (1994). State responses to fiscal crises: the effects of budgetary institutions and politics. Journal of Political Economy, 102(4), 799–821. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pujol, F., & Weber, L. (2003). Are preferences for fiscal discipline endogenous? Public Choice, 114, 421–444. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rose, S. (2006). Do fiscal rules dampen the political business cycle? Public Choice, 128(3–4), 407–431. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruppel, W. (2005). Wiley GAAP for governments 2005. Hoboken: Wiley. Google Scholar
  25. Savage, J. D. (1988). Balanced budgets and American politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
  26. Schmitt-Grohe, S., & Uribe, M. (1997). Balanced-budget rules, distortionary taxes, and aggregate instability. The Journal of Political Economy, 105(5), 976–1000. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Snell, R. K. (2004). State constitutional and statutory requirements for balanced budgets. National conference of state legislatures [cited 2005]. Available from
  28. United States General Accounting Office (GAO) (1985). Budget issues: state balanced budget practices. Washington: Government Printing Office. Google Scholar
  29. United States General Accounting Office (GAO) (1993). Balanced budget requirements: state experiences and implications for the federal government. Washington: Government Printing Office. Google Scholar
  30. Wildavsky, A. (1985). A cultural theory of expenditure growth and (un)balanced budgets. Journal of Public Economics, 28(3), 349–357. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public and International AffairsThe University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public ServiceNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations