Public Choice

, Volume 144, Issue 1–2, pp 105–118 | Cite as

Terrorism, key assets, and critical infrastructures: to protect or to rebuild? That is the question

Article

Abstract

Both the choice between “stick” and “carrot” and the tension between “control” and “preservation of civil liberties” characterize the policy debate over counterterrorism. Arguing for the “carrot and preservation of civil liberties” viewpoint, Frey and Rohner (Def. Peace Econ. 18(3):245–252, 2007) propose strategic reconstruction as an alternative to protection. Our paper provides a comparative analysis of these two policies. First, we study the rationality of the public’s expectations, and we show that credible strategic reconstruction may deter terrorist attacks. Next, we derive conditions under which strategic reconstruction is more efficient than protection. Finally, we show that strategic reconstruction may reinforce the efficiency of protection.

Keywords

Terrorism Protection Rebuilding Critical infrastructure 

JEL Classification

C72 D74 H56 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auerswald, P. E., Branscomb, L. M., La Porte, T. M., & Michel-Kerjan, E. O. (2006). Seeds of disaster, roots of response: how private action can reduce public vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caplan, B. (2006). Terrorism: the relevance of the rational choice model. Public Choice, 128(1–2), 91–107. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dixit, A., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1993). Thinking strategically. New York: Norton. Google Scholar
  4. Frey, B. S. (2004). Dealing with terrorism—sticks or carrots? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
  5. Frey, B. S. (2006). How to deal with terrorism. The Economists’ Voice 3(7). Available at: http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol3/iss7/art4.
  6. Frey, B. S. (2008). Terrorism from the Rational Choice Point of view. In A. Diekman, K. Eichner, P. Schmidt, & T. Voss (Eds.), Rational choice: Theoretische Analysen und empirische Resultate (pp. 211–222). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fur Socialwissenschaften. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frey, B. S., & Rohner, D. (2007). Protecting cultural monuments against terrorism. Defense and Peace Economics, 18(3), 245–252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mickolus, E. F., Sandler, T., Murdock, J. M., & Flemming, P. (2004). International terrorism: attributes of terrorist events, 1968–2003 (ITERATE 5). Dunn Loring: Vinyard Software. Google Scholar
  9. Rosendorff, B. P., & Sandler, T. (2005). The political economy of transnational terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(2), 171–182. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Shughart II, W. F. (2002). September 11, 2001. Public Choice, 112(3–4), 225–232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Panthéon-Assas UniversityParisFrance
  2. 2.Paris Descartes UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations