Terrorism, key assets, and critical infrastructures: to protect or to rebuild? That is the question
Both the choice between “stick” and “carrot” and the tension between “control” and “preservation of civil liberties” characterize the policy debate over counterterrorism. Arguing for the “carrot and preservation of civil liberties” viewpoint, Frey and Rohner (Def. Peace Econ. 18(3):245–252, 2007) propose strategic reconstruction as an alternative to protection. Our paper provides a comparative analysis of these two policies. First, we study the rationality of the public’s expectations, and we show that credible strategic reconstruction may deter terrorist attacks. Next, we derive conditions under which strategic reconstruction is more efficient than protection. Finally, we show that strategic reconstruction may reinforce the efficiency of protection.
KeywordsTerrorism Protection Rebuilding Critical infrastructure
JEL ClassificationC72 D74 H56
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dixit, A., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1993). Thinking strategically. New York: Norton. Google Scholar
- Frey, B. S. (2004). Dealing with terrorism—sticks or carrots? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
- Frey, B. S. (2006). How to deal with terrorism. The Economists’ Voice 3(7). Available at: http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol3/iss7/art4.
- Mickolus, E. F., Sandler, T., Murdock, J. M., & Flemming, P. (2004). International terrorism: attributes of terrorist events, 1968–2003 (ITERATE 5). Dunn Loring: Vinyard Software. Google Scholar