Public Choice

, Volume 144, Issue 1–2, pp 63–81

Referendum design, quorum rules and turnout

Article

Abstract

In this article, we focus on the consequences of quorum requirements for turnout in referendums. We use a rational choice, decision theoretic voting model to demonstrate that participation quorums change the incentives some electors face, inducing those who oppose changes in the status quo and expect to be in the minority to abstain. As a result, paradoxically, participation quorums decrease electoral participation. We test our model’s predictions using data for all referendums held in current European Union countries from 1970 until 2007, and show that the existence of a participation quorums increases abstention by more than ten percentage points.

Keywords

Referendum design Voter turnout 

JEL Classification

D72 C25 C20 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. Google Scholar
  2. Barro, R., & Lee, J.-W. (2001). International data on educational attainment: updates and implications. Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 541–563. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bendor, J., Diermeier, D., & Ting, M. M. (2003). A behavioral model of turnout. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 261–280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote: the merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh: The University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar
  5. Blais, A. (2006). What affects voter turnout? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 111–125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blais, A., & Dobrzynska, A. (1998). Turnout in electoral democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 33(2), 239–262. Google Scholar
  7. Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2007). Enraged or engaged? Preferences for direct citizen participation in affluent democracies. Political Research Quarterly, 60(3), 351–362. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. C2D: Research Centre on Direct Democracy. (2007). C2D Direct Democracy Database. Available at: http://www.c2d.ch.
  9. Chamberlain, G., & Rothschild, M. (1981). A note on the probability of casting a decisive vote. Journal of Economic Theory, 25(1), 152–162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coate, S., & Conlin, M. (2004). A group rule-utilitarian approach of voter turnout: theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1476–1504. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coate, S., Conlin, M., & Moro, A. (2008). The performance of pivotal-voter models in small-scale elections: evidence from Texas liquor referenda. Journal of Public Economics, 92(3–4), 582–596. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Côrte-Real, P., & Pereira, P. T. (2004). The voter who wasn’t there: referenda, representation and abstention. Social Choice and Welfare, 22(2), 349–369. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox, G. W., & Munger, M. C. (1989). Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 US House elections. American Political Science Review, 83(1), 217–231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhillon, A., & Peralta, S. (2002). Economic theories of voter turnout. The Economic Journal, 112(480), 332–352. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feddersen, T. (2004). Rational choice theory and the paradox of not voting. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 99–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feddersen, T. J., & Pesendorfer, W. (1996). The swing voter curse. American Economic Review, 86(3), 408–424. Google Scholar
  17. Feddersen, T. J., & Pesendorfer, W. (1999). Abstention in elections with asymmetric information and diverse preferences. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 381–398. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flickinger, R. S., & Studlar, D. T. (1992). The disappearing voters? Exploring declining turnout in western European elections. West European Politics, 15(2), 1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fornos, C.A., Power, T. J., & Garand, J. C. (2004). Explaining voter turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000. Comparative Political Studies, 37(8), 909–940. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franklin, M. N. (2002). The dynamics of electoral participation. In L. LeDuc et al. (Eds.), Comparing democracies 2: new challenges in the study of elections and voting. London: Sage. Google Scholar
  21. Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freedom House (2007). Freedom in the world: comparative scores for all countries from 1973 to 2006. Available at http://www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/fiw/FIWAllScores.xls.
  23. Gentzkow, M. (2006). Television and voter turnout. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(3), 931–972. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Shachar, R. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming: evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 540–550. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geys, B. (2006). Explaining voter turnout: a review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637–663. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greene, W. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th Ed.) Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
  27. Herrera, H., & Mattozzi, A. (2009, forthcoming). Quorum and turnout in referenda. Journal of the European Economic Association. Google Scholar
  28. International IDEA: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. (2007). Voter turnout website. Available at http://www.idea.int/vt/.
  29. Jackman, R. W. (1987). Political institutions and voter turnout in the industrial democracies. American Political Science Review, 81(2), 405–423. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaufmann, B., Büchi, R., & Braun, N. (2008). Guidebook to direct democracy in Switzerland and beyond. Marburg: Initiative & Referendum Institute Europe. Google Scholar
  31. Kostadinova, T. (2003). Voter turnout dynamics in post-Communist Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 42(6), 741–759. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. LeDuc, L. (2003). The politics of direct democracy: referendums in global perspective. Toronto: Broadview Press. Google Scholar
  33. Levine, D. K., & Palfrey, T. R. (2007). The paradox of voter participation? A laboratory study. American Political Science Review, 101(1), 143–158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Skalaban, A. (1989). Citizen forecasting: can voters see into the future? British Journal of Political Science, 19(1), 146–153. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Tien, C. (1999). Voters as forecasters: a micromodel of election prediction. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(2), 175–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lupia, A., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). Direct democracy: new approaches to old questions. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 463–482. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marshall, M. G., Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (2006). Polity IV project: political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2004. Maryland: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland. Google Scholar
  38. Matsusaka, J. G. (1993). Election closeness and voter turnout: evidence from California ballot propositions. Public Choice, 76(4), 313–334. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Noam, E. (1980). The efficiency of direct democracy. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(4), 803–810. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: reinventing political activism. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Qvortrup, M. (2005). A comparative study of referendums. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar
  42. Radcliff, B. (1992). The welfare state, turnout, and the economy: a comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 444–456. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rallings, C., Thrasher, M., & Borisyuk, G. (2003). Seasonal factors, voter fatigue and the costs of voting. Electoral Studies, 22(1), 65–79. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine national second-order elections: a systematic framework for the analysis of European elections results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Setälä, M. (1999). Referendums in western Europe—a wave of direct democracy? Scandinavian Political Studies, 22(4), 327–340. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shachar, R., & Nalebuff, B. (1999). Follow the leader: theory and evidence on political participation. The American Economic Review, 89(3), 525–547. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Suksi, M. (1993). Bringing in the people: a comparison of the constitutional forms and practices of the referendum. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar
  48. Uleri, P. V. (2002). On referendum voting in Italy: Yes, No or non-vote? How Italian parties learned to control referendums. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6), 863–883. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Venice Commission (2005). Tables summarizing the replies to the questionnaire on referendums by the VC adopted by the Council for Democratic Election and the Venice Commission. Document CDL-AD(2005)034add. Available at http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2005/CDL-AD(2005)034add-e.pdf.
  50. Venice Commission (2007). Code of good practice on referendums. Document CDL-AD(2007)008. Available at http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2007/CDL-AD(2007)008-e.asp.
  51. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  52. Verhulst, J., & Nijeboer, A. (2008). Direct democracy: facts and arguments about the introduction of initiative and referendum. Brussels: Democracy International. Google Scholar
  53. Voitchovsky, S. (2005). Does the profile of income inequality matter for economic growth? Distinguishing between the effects of inequality in different parts of the income distribution. Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 273–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Washington, E. (2006). How black candidates affect voter turnout. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(3), 973–998. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economics DepartmentNIPE and University of MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.Social Sciences InstituteUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations