Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 142, Issue 1–2, pp 195–213 | Cite as

Government size and growth: Accounting for economic freedom and globalization

  • Andreas Bergh
  • Martin Karlsson
Article

Abstract

We examine the relationship between government size and economic growth, controlling for economic freedom and globalization, and using Bayesian Averaging over Classical Estimates in a panel of rich countries.

Countries with big government have experienced above average increases in the KOF globalization index and in the Fraser institute’s Economic freedom index. To maintain comparability with earlier studies, we use two sample periods: 1970–1995 and 1970–2005. Government size robustly correlates negatively with growth. We also find some evidence that countries with big government can use economic openness and sound economic policies to mitigate negative effects of big government.

Keywords

Government size Growth Economic freedom Globalization Taxes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agell, J., Ohlsson, H., & Skogman Thoursie, P. (2006). Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries: A comment. European Economic Review, 50, 211–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro, R. J., & Lee, J.-W. (2000). International data on educational attainment: Updates and implications. CID Working Paper No. 42, April 2000. Google Scholar
  3. Cameron, D. R. (1978). The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 72, 1243–1261. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castles, F. G. (2004). The future of the welfare state crisis myths and crisis realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  5. Dawson, J. W. (1998). Institutions, investment, and growth: New cross-country and panel data evidence. Economic Inquiry, 36, 603–619. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawson, J. W. (2003). Causality in the freedom-growth relationship. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 479–495. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Haan, J., & Sturm, J. E. (2000). On the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 16, 215–241. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Haan, J., & Sturm, J. E. (2006). How to handle economic freedom: Reply to Lawson. Econ Journal Watch, 3, 407–411. Google Scholar
  9. Dixit, A. (2009). Governance institutions and economic activity. American Economic Review, 99, 5–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doppelhofer, G., Miller, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Determinants of long-term growth: A Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. American Economic Review, 94, 813–835. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doucouliagos, C., & Ulubasoglu, M. A. (2006). Economic freedom and economic growth: Does specification make a difference? European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 60–81. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Down, I. (2007). Revisiting the compensation hypothesis of welfare state development: Trade openness, country size and economic volatility. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hotel, Chicago, IL, 12 April 2008. Google Scholar
  13. Dreher, A. (2006a). Does globalization affect growth? Empirical evidence from a new index. Applied Economics, 38, 1091–1110. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dreher, A. (2006b). The influence of globalization on taxes and social policy: An empirical analysis for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 179–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dreher, A., Sturm, J.-E., & Ursprung, H. W. (2008). The impact of globalization on the composition of government expenditures: Evidence from panel data. Public Choice, 134, 263–292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fölster, S., & Henrekson, M. (2001). Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries. European Economic Review, 45, 1501–1520. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gramlich, E. M. (1982). An econometric examination of the new federalism. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 327–360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Norton, S. (2008). Economic freedom of the world: 2008 annual report. Vancouver, BC, Canada: The Fraser Institute. Retrieved from www.freetheworld.com.
  19. Heckelman, J. C. (2000). Economic freedom and economic growth: A short-run causal investigation. Journal of Applied Economics, 3, 71–91. Google Scholar
  20. Iversen, T. (2005). Capitalism, democracy and welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  21. Katzenstein, P. (1985). Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
  22. Kim, S. Y. (2007). Openness, external risk, and volatility: Implications for the compensation hypothesis. International Organization, 61, 181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee Ha, Y., Ricci Luca, A., & Rigobon, R. (2004). Once again, is openness good for growth? Journal of Development Economics, 75, 451–472. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindbeck, A. (1975). Business cycles, politics, and international economic dependence. Skandinaviska Enskilden Bank Quarterly Review, 2, 53–68. Google Scholar
  25. Lindert, P. H. (2004). Growing public. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  26. Madrick, J. (2009). The case for big government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  27. Martin, H.-P., & Schumann, H. (1997). The global trap: Globalization and the assault on prosperity and democracy. London: Zed Books. Google Scholar
  28. Mendoza, E. G., Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., & Asea, P. (1997). On the ineffectiveness of tax policy in altering long-run growth: Harberger’s superneutrality conjecture. Journal of Public Economics, 66(1), 99–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodriguez, F., & Rodrik, D. (1999). Trade policy and economic growth: A skeptic’s guide to cross-national evidence. NBER Working Paper No. W7081. Google Scholar
  30. Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? The Journal of Political Economy, 106, 997–1032. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Romero-Avila, D., & Strauch, R. (2008). Public finances and long-term growth in Europe: Evidence from a panel data analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 172–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sinn, H. W. (1997). The selection principle and market failure in systems competition. Journal of Public Economics, 66, 247–274. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skocpol, T. (1990). Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research. In P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 3–43). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  34. Thakur, S., Keen, M., Horváth, B., & Cerra, V. (2003). Sweden’s welfare state: Can the bumblebee keep flying? Washington: International Monetary Fund. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lund University & The Ratio InstituteStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Institute of AgeingUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations