Informal institutions rule: institutional arrangements and economic performance
- 2k Downloads
Institutions are widely believed to be important for economic development. This paper attempts to contribute to our understanding of how institutions matter by examining the effect of formal and informal institutional arrangements on economic progress. Formal institutions represent government defined and enforced constraints while informal institutions capture private constraints. The findings suggest that the presence of informal institutions is a strong determinant of development. In contrast, formal institutions are only successful when embedded in informal constraints, and codifying informal rules can lead to negative unintended consequences. This suggests that institutions cannot be easily transplanted in order to spur economic development.
KeywordsInformal institutions Formal institutions Development Codification
JEL ClassificationF55 O17
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401. Google Scholar
- Anderson, T., & Hill, P. J. (1979). An American experiment in anarcho-capitalism: the not so wild, wild west. Journal of Liberation Studies, 3(1), 9–29. Google Scholar
- Benson, B. (1989b). Enforcement of private property rights in primitive societies: law without government. The Journal of Libertarian Studies, 9(1), 1–26. Google Scholar
- Boettke, P. (1994). The political infrastructure of economic development. Human Systems Management, 13, 89–100. Google Scholar
- de Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
- Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption. New York: Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar
- Greif, A. (1993). Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: the Maghribi traders’ coalition. The American Economic Review, 83(3), 525–548. Google Scholar
- Kaufmann, D., Kraay A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance matters III: updated governance indicators for 1996-02. Working paper draft for comments. Washington: World Bank. Google Scholar
- Leblang, D. A. (1996). Property rights, democracy and economic growth. Political Research Quarterly, 49(1), 5–26. Google Scholar
- Nenova, T., & Harford, T. (2004). Anarchy and invention: how does Somalia cope without government? In Public policy for the private sector. Washington: The World Bank. Google Scholar
- North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Google Scholar
- North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar
- Tabellini, G. (2007). Culture and institutions: economic development in the regions of Europe. Mimeo. Google Scholar
- Transparency International (2000). Corruption Perceptions Index 2000. http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi.
- Williamson, C. R., & Kerekes, C. B. (2008). Securing private property: formal versus informal institutions. Working Paper. Google Scholar