Public Choice

, Volume 134, Issue 3–4, pp 263–292

The impact of globalization on the composition of government expenditures: Evidence from panel data

  • Axel Dreher
  • Jan-Egbert Sturm
  • Heinrich W. Ursprung
Article

Abstract

According to the disciplining hypothesis, globalization restrains governments by inducing increased budgetary pressure. As a consequence, governments may attempt to curtail the welfare state, which is often seen as a drag on international competitiveness, by reducing especially their expenditures on transfers and subsidies. This globalization-induced welfare state retrenchment is potentially mitigated by citizens’ preferences to be compensated for the risks of globalization (“compensation hypothesis”). Employing two different datasets and various measures of globalization, we analyze whether globalization has indeed influenced the composition of government expenditures. For a sample of 60 countries, we examine the development of four broad expenditure categories for the period 1971–2001: capital expenditures, expenditures for goods and services, interest payments, and subsidies and other current transfers. A second dataset provides a much more detailed classification: public expenditures, expenditures for defence, order, economic affairs, environment, housing, health, recreation, education, and social expenditures. However, this second data set is only available since 1990—and only for OECD countries. Our results show that globalization did not influence the composition of government expenditures in a notable way.

Keywords

Globalization Economic policy Government expenditure composition Tax competition 

JEL

H7 H87 C23 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adsera, A., & Boix, C. (2002). Trade, democracy, and the size of the public sector: The political underpinnings of openness. International Organization, 56, 229–262. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansell, B. (2003, August). Human capital and globalization (Paper presented at the American Political Science Association 2003 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia). Google Scholar
  3. Ansell, B. (2004, April). Education through globalization (Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago). Google Scholar
  4. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aubin, C., Berdot, J.-P., Goyeau, D., & Lafay, J.-D. (1988). The growth of public expenditure in France. In J. A. Lybeck & M. Henrekson (Eds.), Explaining the growth of government (pp. 201–230). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
  6. Avelino, G., Brown, D., & Hunter, W. (2005). The effects of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980–1999. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 625–641. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bai, C.-E., & Wei, S.-J. (2001). The quality of bureaucracy and capital account policies. World Bank Working Paper Series, No. 2575. Google Scholar
  8. Bengoa, M., & Sanches-Robles, B. (2003). Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and growth: New evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 529–545. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergh, A. (2006). Explaining welfare state survival: The role of economic freedom and globalization. Ratio Institut, mimeo. Google Scholar
  10. Bjørnskov, C. (2006). Globalization and institutions: New evidence using the Dreher Index. Aarhus University, mimeo. Google Scholar
  11. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breton, A., & Ursprung, H. W. (2002). Globalisation, competitive governments, and constitutuional choice in Europe. In H. Kierzkowski (Ed.), Europe and globalization (pp. 274–301). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
  13. Bretschger, L., & Hettich, F. (2002). Globalisation, capital mobility and tax competition: Theory and evidence for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 695–716. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Busse, M. (2004). Transnational corporations and repression of political rights and civil liberties: An empirical analysis. Kyklos, 57, 45–66. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carey, D., & Rabesona, J. (2002). Tax ratios on labour and capital income and on consumption. OECD Economic Studies, 35(2), 129–174. Google Scholar
  16. Cusack, T. R. (1997). Partisan politics and public finance: Changes in public spending in the industrialized democracies 1955–1989. Public Choice, 91, 375–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devereux, M. P., & Griffith, R. (2003). Evaluating tax policy for location decisions. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(2), 107–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Devereux, M. P., Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. (2002). Do countries compete over corporate tax rates? University of Warwick, mimeo. Google Scholar
  19. Dooley, M., & Isard, P. (1980). Capital controls, political risk and deviations from interest rate parity. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 370–384. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dreher, A. (2006a). The influence of globalization on taxes and social policy – An empirical analysis for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 179–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dreher, A. (2006b). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dreher, A., & Gaston, N. (2007a). Has globalization really had no effect on unions? Kyklos, 60(2), 165–186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dreher, A., & Gaston, N. (2007b, forthcoming). Has globalisation increased inequality? Review of International Economics. Google Scholar
  24. Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2007). Measuring globalisation (book manuscript). Google Scholar
  25. Dreher, A., & Siemers, L.-H. R. (2005). The intriguing nexus between corruption and capital account restrictions. KOF Working Paper 113, ETH Zurich. Google Scholar
  26. Exbrayat, N., Gaigné, C., & Riou, S. (2006). Trade integration and the destination of public expenditures. University of Saint-Etienne, mimeo. Google Scholar
  27. Garrett, G. (1995). Capital mobility, trade, and the domestic politics of economic policy. International Organization, 49, 657–687. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garrett, G. (1998a). Global markets and national politics: Collision course or virtuous circle? International Organization, 52(4), 787–824. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garrett, G. (1998b). Governing the global economy: Economic policy and market integration around the world. Yale University, mimeo. Google Scholar
  30. Garrett, G., & Mitchell, D. (1997). International risk and social insurance: Reassessing the globalization-welfare state nexus. Yale University, mimeo. Google Scholar
  31. Garrett, G., & Mitchell, D. (2001). Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research, 39, 145–177. Google Scholar
  32. Garrett, G., & Rodden, J. (2000, April). Globalization and decentralization (Prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago). Google Scholar
  33. Gersbach, H., & Schmutzler, A. (2005). The effects of globalization on worker training. CEPR DP, No. 4879. Google Scholar
  34. Giavazzi, F., & Pagano, M. (1988). Capital Controls in the EMS. In D. E. Fair & C. de Boissieu (Eds.), International monetary and financial integration: The European dimension (pp. 261–289). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar
  35. Glick, R., & Hutchison, M. M. (2000). Capital controls and exchange rate instability in developing economies. Research Working Paper PB-005, FRBSF Center for Pacific Basin Monetary and Economic. Google Scholar
  36. Grilli, V., & Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (1995). Economic effects and structural determinants of capital controls. IMF Staff Papers, 42(3), 517–551. Google Scholar
  37. Gruben, W. C., & McLeod, D. (2001). Capital account liberalization and disinflation in the 1990s. CLAE Working Paper 0101, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Google Scholar
  38. Gwartney, J., & Lawson, R. (2001). Economic freedom of the world. Annual report. Retrieved June 22, 2007. http://www.freetheworld.org/.
  39. Harms, P., & Ursprung, H. W. (2002). Do civil and political repression really boost foreign direct investments? Economic Inquiry, 40, 651–663. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hicks, A., & Swank, D. (1992). Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies 1960–82. American Political Science Review, 86, 658–674. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huber, E., Ragin, C., & Stephens, J. (1993). Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 711–749. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Iversen, T., & Cusack, T. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics, 52, 313–349. Google Scholar
  43. Kaufman, R., & Segura-Ubiergo, A. (2001). Globalization, domestic politics, and social spending in Latin America: A time-series cross-section analysis, 1973–1997. World Politics, 53, 553–587. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kittel, B., & Winner, H. (2005). How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization-welfare state nexus revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 44(2), 269–293. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lamla, M. (2005). Long-run determinants of pollution: A robustness analysis. ETH Zurich, mimeo. Google Scholar
  46. Li, Q., & Reuveny, R. (2003). Economic globalization and democracy: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Political Science, 33, 29–54. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lin, S. (1992). The effect of inflation on government expenditure: New evidence. Atlantic Economic Journal, 20(4), 86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (1998). Why capital controls? Theory and evidence. In S. Eijffinger & H. Huizinga (Eds.), Positive political economy: Theory and evidence (pp. 217–247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  49. Nickell, S. J. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49, 1417–1426. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. OECD (2004). Public expenditure database. CD-Rom, Paris. Google Scholar
  51. Plümper, T., Manow, P., & Troeger, V. (2005). Pooled data analysis in the comparative political economy of the welfare state: A note on methodology and theory. European Journal of Political Research, 44(2), 327–354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Quinn, D. (1997). The correlates of change in international financial regulation. American Political Science Review, 91, 531–551. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Richards, D., Gelleny, R., & Sacko, D. (2001). Money with a Mean Streak? Foreign economic penetration and government respect for human rights in developing countries. International Studies Quarterly, 45, 219–239. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Washington: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar
  55. Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106, 997–1032. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roodman, D. (2005). xtabond2: Stata module to extend xtabond dynamic panel data estimator. Washington: Center for Global Development. Google Scholar
  57. Rudra, N. (2002). Globalization and the decline of the welfare state in less developed countries. International Organization, 56, 411–445. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rudra, N. (2004). Openness, welfare spending and inequality in the developing world. International Studies Quarterly, 48, 683–709. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rudra, N. (2005). Globalization and the strengthening of democracy in the developing world. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 704–730. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schulze, G., & Ursprung, H. W. (1999). Globalization of the economy and the nation state. The World Economy, 22, 295–352. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schulze, G., & Ursprung, H. W. (2001). International environmental economics: A survey of the issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  62. Sinn, H. W. (2003). The new systems competition. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  63. Swank, D. (1997). Global markets, democratic institutions, and the public economy in advanced industrial societies. Marquette University, mimeo. Google Scholar
  64. Tsai, M.-C. (2007). Does globalization affect human well-being? Social Indicators Research, 81(1), 103–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tytell, I., & Wei, S. (2004). Does financial globalization induce better macroeconomic policies? IMF Working Paper No. WP/04/84. Google Scholar
  66. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. World Bank (2003). World development indicators. CD-Rom, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, BV 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Axel Dreher
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jan-Egbert Sturm
    • 1
    • 3
  • Heinrich W. Ursprung
    • 2
  1. 1.KOF Swiss Economic InstituteETH ZurichZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany
  3. 3.CESifoMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations