Public Choice

, 134:15 | Cite as

The power and politics of blogs

  • Henry Farrell
  • Daniel W. DreznerEmail author


The rise of bloggers raises the vexing question of why blogs have any influence at all, given their relatively low readership and lack of central organization. We argue that to answer this question we need to focus on two key factors—the unequal distribution of readers across weblogs, and the relatively high readership of blogs among journalists and other political elites. The unequal distribution of readership, combined with internal norms and linking practices allows interesting news and opinions to rise to the “top” of the blogosphere, and thus to the attention of elite actors, whose understanding of politics may be changed by frames adopted from the blogosphere.


Blogs Bloggers US politics Internet WWW 


  1. Adamic, L., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on link discovery (pp. 36–43). Accessed at
  2. Adamic, L., & Huberman, B. A. (1999). Technical comment to emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albert, R., & Barabási, A. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashlin, A., & Ladle, R. J. (2006). Environmental science adrift in the blogosphere. Science, 312, 201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barabási, A. (2000). Power law distribution of the World Wide Web. Science, 287, 2115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blood, R. (2002). The Weblog Handbook. New York: Perseus Books. Google Scholar
  8. Burt, R. S. (1980). Models of social structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 79–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cederman, L. E. (2003). Modelling the size of wars: from billiard balls to sandpiles. American Political Science Review, 97, 135–150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dautrich, K., & Barnes, C. (2005a). Freedom of the press survey: general population 2005. Storrs, CT, University of Connecticut, Department of Public Policy, May 14. Accessed at
  11. Dautrich, K., & Barnes, C. (2005b). Freedom of the press survey: journalists 2005. Storrs, CT, University of Connecticut, Department of Public Policy, May 14. Accessed at
  12. de Solla Price, D. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27, 292–306. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan, D. P., Jasperson, A., Shah, D. V., Watts, M., & Faber, R. (1998). Framing and the public agenda: media effects on the importance of the federal budget deficit. Political Communication, 15, 205–224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gould, R. V. (2003). Uses of network tools in comparative historical research. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  15. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greif, A. (1993). Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: the Maghribi traders’ coalition. American Economic Review, 83, 525–548. Google Scholar
  17. Hargrave, S. (2004). The blog busters. The Guardian, 9 August. Google Scholar
  18. Henning, J. (2003). The blogging iceberg. Perseus Development Corporation. Accessed at
  19. Hindman, M., Tsioutsiouliklis, K., & Johnson, J. (2003). ‘Googlearchy’: how a few heavily-linked sites dominate politics online. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, August 2003. Google Scholar
  20. Huberman, B. A. (2002). Scale free networks: structure, dynamics and search. Mimeograph, Palo Alto, CA. Accessed at
  21. Kaus, M. (2003). The case against editors. Slate, 28 October. Google Scholar
  22. Kurtz, H. (2003). Bill Keller’s changing times. Washington Post, 24 November, p. C1. Google Scholar
  23. McCubbins, M., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 2, 165–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nelson, T., Clawson, R., & Oxley, Z. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567–583. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167–256. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Packer, G. (2004). The revolution will not be blogged. Mother Jones (May/June). Google Scholar
  27. Padgett, J., & Ansell, C. K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the medici. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1259–1319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pennock, D. M., Flake, G. W., Lawrence, S., Glover, E. J., & Giles, C. L. (2002). Winners don’t take all: characterizing the competition for links on the Web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 5207–5211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rainie, L. (2005). The state of blogging. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC, January 2005. Accessed at
  30. Rainie, L., Fox, S., & Fallows, D. (2003). Blogs gain a small foothold. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC, January 2003. Accessed at
  31. Reynolds, G. (2003). Earlier I mentioned this post., October 1st. Available at
  32. Rosen, J. (2004). Interview with Thomas Edsall. July 28. Available at
  33. Rosenberg, S. (2002). Much ado about blogging. Salon, 10 May. Google Scholar
  34. Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  35. Shirky, C. (2003). Power laws, Weblogs and inequality. Accessed at
  36. Simon, H. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42, 425–440. Google Scholar
  37. Smolkin, R. (2004). The expanding blogosphere. American Journalism Review, 14, 100–111. Google Scholar
  38. Sugden, R. (1995). A theory of focal points. The Economic Journal, 105, 533–550. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. von Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530. Google Scholar
  40. Watts, D. (1999). Small worlds. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  41. Watts, D. (2003). Six degrees: the science of a connected age. New York: Norton. Google Scholar
  42. Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (1988). Introduction: studying social structure. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structure: a network approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, BV 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TuftsMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations