Public Choice

, Volume 131, Issue 3–4, pp 387–411 | Cite as

Does political knowledge increase turnout? Evidence from the 1997 British general election

Original Article

Abstract

A number of recent formal models predict a positive effect of political knowledge on turnout. Both information acquisition and turnout, however, are likely to be determined by a similar set of variables, rendering hard the identification of a causal link in empirical investigations. Available empirical regularities should therefore be interpreted as mere correlations. I address this problem by using an intrumental variables approach, where the instruments are represented by various proxies of information supply on mass media. Using survey data from the 1997 British General Election Study, I show that political knowledge has a sizeable influence on the probability of voting and that mass media play an important role in influencing political participation.

Keywords

Voting Information Mass media Political participation Information aggregation British politics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson, P.R., Silver, B.D., & Anderson, B.A. (1987). The effects of question order in attitude surveys: The case of the SRC/CPS citizen duty items. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 900–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldashev, G. (2005). Political information acquisition for social exchange. mimeo, Universita Bocconi.Google Scholar
  3. Aldrich, J.H. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 246–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austen-Smith, D. (1990). Information transmission in debate. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 124–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartels, L.M. (1996). Uninformed voters: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 194–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battaglini, M., Morton, R., & Palfrey, T.R. (2006). The swing voter's curse in the laboratory, CEPR Discussion Paper 5458.Google Scholar
  7. Besley, T., & Case, A. (2003). Political institutions and policy choices: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, XLI, 7–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bishop, G.F., Oldendick, R.W., & Tuchfarber, A.J. (1984). Interest in political campaigns: The influence of question order and electoral context. Political Behaviour, 6, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bollen, K.A., Guilkey, D.K., & Mroz, T.A. (1995). Binary Outcomes and Endogenous Explanatory Variables: Tests and Solutions with an Applications to the Demand for contraceptive use in Tunisia. Demography, 32, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boothroyd, D. (2002). United Kingdom Election Results, http://www.election.demon.co.uk/
  11. Calvert, R.L. (1985). Robustness of the multidimensional voting model: Candidate motivations, uncertainty and convergence. American Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coupé, T., & Noury, A.G. (2004). Choosing not to choose: On the link between information and abstention. Economics Letter, 84, 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox, G.W., & Munger, M.C. (1989). Closeness, expenditure, turnout: The 1982 U.S. house elections. American Political Science Review, 83, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crewe, I., Fox, A., & Alt, J. (1977). Non-voting in British general elections 1966-October 1974. In C. Crouch (Ed.), British political sociology yearbook, Vol. 3, (pp. 38–109), London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  15. Delli Carpini, M.X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Denver, D. (2003). Elections and voters in Britain. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  17. Feddersen, T.J., & Pesendorfer, W. (1996). The Swing's voter's curse. American Economic Review, 86, 408–424.Google Scholar
  18. Feddersen, T.J., & Pesendorfer, W. (1999). Abstention in elections with asymmetric information and diverse preferences. American Political Science Review, 93, 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice, 50, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerber, A.S., & Green, D.P. (2000). The effects of personal canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94, 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghirardato, P., & Katz, J.N. (2002). Indecision theory: Quality of information and voting behaviour. Social Science Working Paper 1106R, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  22. Gilens, M. (2001). Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 379–396.Google Scholar
  23. Grofman, B., & Norrander, B. (1990). Efficient use of reference group cues in a single dimension. Public Choice, 64, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heath, A., Jowell, R., Curtice, J.K., & Norris, P. (1999). The British general election study, 1997, available at http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/
  25. Hicks, A.M., & Swank, D.H. (1992). Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960–1982. American Political Science Review, 86, 658–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hill, K.Q., & Leighley, J.E. (1992). The policy consequences of class bias in state electorates. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hill, K.Q., Leighley, J.E., & Hinton-Andersson, A. (1995). Lower class mobilization and policy linkage in the US States. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horiuchi, Y., Imai, K., & Taniguchi, N. (2005). Estimating the causal effects of policy information on voter turnout: An internet-based randomized field experiment in Japan. Australian National University Discussion Paper 05-4.Google Scholar
  29. Husted, T.A., & Kenny, L.W. (1997). The effect of the expansion of the voting Franchise on the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 54–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Larcinese, V. (2000). Information acquisition and Electoral Turnout: Theory and evidence from Britain. Paper presented at the CEPR meeting, “The Political Economy of Economic Policy”, Toulouse.Google Scholar
  31. Larcinese, V. (2005). Electoral Competition and Redistribution with Rationally Informed Voters. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 4(1), art. 4.Google Scholar
  32. Larcinese, V. (2007). The instrumental voter goes to the news-agent: Information acquisition, marginality and the media. Journal of Theoretical Politics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  33. Lassen, D.D. (2005). The effect of information on voter turnout: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 103–118.Google Scholar
  34. Leighley, J.E., & Nagler, J. (1992). Individual and systemic influences on turnout: Who votes? 1984. The Journal of Politics, 54, 718–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levitt, D.S., & Snyder, J.J. (1995). Political parties and the distribution of federal outlays. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 958–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindert, P. (1996). What limits social spending? Explorations in Economic History, 33, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lupia, A. (1992). Busy voters, agenda control, and the power of information. American Political Science Review, 86, 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behaviour in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M.D. (1998). The Democratic Dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Luskin, R.C. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 331–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maddala, G. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Matsusaka, J.G. (1995). Explaining voter turnout patterns: An information theory. Public Choice, 84, 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matsusaka, J.G., & Palda, F. (1999). Voter turnout: How much can we explain? Public Choice, 98, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McKelvey, R.D., & Ordeshook, P.C. (1984). Rational expectations in elections: Some experimental results based on a multidimensional model. Public Choice, 44, 61–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Milligan, K., Moretti, E., & Oreopoulos, P. (2004). Does education improve citizenship? Evidence from the US and the UK. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1667–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nie, N.H., Junn, J., & Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Palfrey, T.R., & Poole, K.T. (1987). The relationship between information, ideology, and voting behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Patterson, S.C., & Caldeira, G.A. (1983). Getting out the vote: Participation in gubernatorial elections. American Political Science Review, 77, 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peterson, P.E., & Rom, M. (1989). American federalism, welfare policies, and residential choices. American Political Science Review, 83, 711–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Popkin, S.L. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Riker, W.H., & Ordeshook, P.C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosenstone, S., & Hansen, J.M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  53. Sanders, M.S. (2001). Uncertainty and turnout. Political Analysis, 9, 45–57.Google Scholar
  54. Shachar, R., & Nalebuff, B. (1999). Follow the leader: Theory and evidence on political participation. American Economic Review, 89, 525–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sniderman, P.M., Brody, R.A., & Tetlock, P.E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sobel J. (1985). A theory of credibility. Review of Economic Studies, 52, 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strömberg, D. (2004). Radio impact on public spending. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Swaddle, K., & Heath, A. (1989). Official and reported turnout in the British general election of 1987. British Journal of Political Science, 19, 537–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tenn, S. (2005). An alternative measure of relative education to explain voter turnout. Journal of Politics, 67, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Young, P. (1988). Condorcet's theory of voting. Americal Political Science Review, 82, 1231–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wattenberg, M., McAllister, I., & Salvanto, A. (2000). How voting is like taking a SAT test — an analysis of American voter roloff. American Politics Quarterly, 28, 234–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wittman, D.A. (1995). The myth of democratic failure: Why political institutions are efficient. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wolfinger, R.E., & Rosenstone, S.J. (1980). Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Wooldridge, J.M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Government and STICERDLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations