Public Choice

, Volume 131, Issue 3–4, pp 351–364 | Cite as

Choosing a runoff election threshold

Original Article

Abstract

This paper investigates when a runoff election is desirable and when a plurality result is good enough. A runoff election increases the likelihood that the Condorcet winner will be elected but also entails additional costs. The metric for determining whether a runoff election is desirable will be the probability that the winner of the plurality election would win an ensuing runoff. Statistical models of voter behavior are developed that estimate this probability, which are verified with runoff-election data from United States elections. The models allow governments to make more informed choices in creating rules to decide when to hold runoff elections.

Keywords

Runoff elections Mathematical modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. (1997). Condorcet Efficiency and the Behavioral Model of the Vote. Journal of Politics, 59, 1252–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, J., & Berliner, L.M. (1986). Robust Bayes and Empirical Bayes Analysis with -Contaminated Priors. Annals of Statistics, 14, 461–486.Google Scholar
  3. Bullock, C.S. III, & Johnson, L.K. (1992). Runoff elections in the United States. University of North Carolina Press: Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Bullock, C.S. III, & Gaddie, R.K. (1994). Runoffs in Jesse Jackson's backyard. Social Science Quarterly, 75, 446–454.Google Scholar
  5. Bullock, C.S. III, Gaddie, R.K., & Ferrington, A. (2001). When experience fails: The experience factor in Congressional runoffs. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bullock, C.S. III, Gaddie, R.K., & Ferrington, A. (2002). System Structure, Campaign Stimuli, and Voter Falloff in Runoff Primaries. Journal of Politics, 64, 1210–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bullock, C.S. III, & Maggioto, M.A. (2003). Female success in runoff primaries. Women and Politics, 24, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colomer, J.M. (2004). The Americas: General overview. In J.M. Colomer (ed.) Handbook of electoral system choice. Palgrave Macmillan: New York.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, M., Hastings, N., & Peacock, B. (2000). Statistical distributions. J. Wiley & Sons: New York.Google Scholar
  10. Farrell, D.M., & McAllister, I. (2005). 1902 and the Origins of Preferential Electoral Systems in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 51, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fishburn, P.C., & Gehrlein, W. (1976). An analysis of simple two-stage voting systems. Behavioral Science, 21, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fishburn, P.C., & Gehrlein, W. (1977). An analysis of voting procedures with nonranked voting. Behavioral Science, 22, 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fishburn, P.C., & Brams, S.J. (1981). Approval voting, Condorcet's principle, and runoff elections. Public Choice, 36, 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, Mark P. (1994). Presidential Election Laws and Multipartism in Latin America. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 41–57.Google Scholar
  15. Martinelli, C. (2002), Simple plurality versus plurality runoff with privately informed voters. Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 901–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Merrill, S. III (1988). Making multicandidate elections more democratic. Princeton University Press: Princeton.Google Scholar
  17. O'Neill, J.C. (2006). Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count: The right to vote and the choice of a voting system. Michigan State Law Review forthcoming.Google Scholar
  18. Riker, W.H. (1988). Liberalism against populism. Waveland Press: Prospect Heights, Illinois.Google Scholar
  19. Rivière, A. (2004). Comparing electoral systems: A geometric analysis. Public Choice, 118, 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shugart, M.S., & Taagepera, R. (1994). Plurality versus majority election of presidents: A proposal for a ”double complement rule.“ Comparative Political Studies, 27, 323–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wright, S.G. (1989). Voter Turnout in Runoff Elections. Journal of Politics, 51, 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wright, S.G., & Riker, W.H. (1989). Plurality and runoff systems and numbers of candidates. Public Choice, 60, 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wolf Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.BostonUSA
  2. 2.ArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations