Public Choice

, Volume 128, Issue 1–2, pp 233–244 | Cite as

Terrorism as theater: Analysis and policy implications

Original Article

Abstract

In some regards the production of terrorism resembles the production of culture, especially television and theater. Terrorism is a spectacle produced for viewers, many of whom live apart from the violent staged events. Spectacular theater and the telling of memorable stories are inputs for fundraising and motivating subsequent terrorists. This understanding of terrorist motivation has concrete policy implications.

Keywords

Terrorism Public goods Focality Spectacle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, Y., & Pluchinsky, D. (1992). Europe's Red Terrorists: The Fighting Communist Organizations. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  2. Berman, E., & Laitin, D.D. (no date). Rational martyrs vs. hard targets: evidence on the tactical use of suicide attacks. Unpublished manuscript, UCSD and Stanford University.Google Scholar
  3. Chwe, M. (2003). Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Coll, S. (2004). Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. DeBord, G. (1995). The society of the Spectacle. Zone Books.Google Scholar
  6. Enders, W., & Sandler, T. (2004). After 9/11: Is it all different now? Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  7. Gambetta, D. (ed.) (2005). Making Sense of Suicide Missions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Harris, L. (2004). Civilization and its enemies: The Next Stage of History. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jay, M. (1994). Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, D.D.P. (2004). Overconfidence and War: The Havoc and Glory of Positive Illusions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kellner, D. (2003). Media spectacle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Landes, W.M. (1978). An economic study of aircraft hijackings, 1961–1976. Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lapan, H.E., & Sandler, T. (1993). Terrorism and signaling. European Journal of Political Economy, 93, 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McDougall, C. (2004). Reasons they haven't hit us again, answering the big question. At http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/features/10560/.
  15. Poole, K., & Rosenthal, H. (1996). A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ricolfi, L. (2005). Palestinians, 1981–2003. In D. Gambetta (ed.). Making Sense of Suicide Missions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sandler, T., & Enders, W. (2004). Transnational terrorism: an economic analysis. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  18. Sorel, G. (1999). Reflections on violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Veyne, P. (1990). Bread and Circuses: Historical Sociology and Political Pluralism. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  20. Young, P. (1996). The economics of convention. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 105–122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations