Public Choice

, Volume 127, Issue 1–2, pp 5–30 | Cite as

The story of Katrina: New Orleans and the political economy of catastrophe

Editorial Commentaries on the Political Economy of Catastrophe in New Orleans

Abstract

This paper analyzes the public policies that lead to ‘`Katrina,’' paying particular attention to political decisions that created unusual risks in the New Orleans area. Most of the deaths from hurricane Katrina were concentrated in one place, New Orleans, and those losses arose in large part from its location in combination with its three century long effort to ‘`manage’' the risks associated with that location. Crisis management is inherently more error prone than ordinary policy making, because surprise implies the existence of significant information problems and urgency implies that time does not exist to completely address those problems (Congleton, 2005). In New Orleans the unavoidable mistakes of crisis management were compounded by policy choices made well before Katrina made landfall, as well as federalism, partisan politics, corruption, and incompetence.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Congleton, R. D. (2005, forthcoming). Toward a political economy of crisis management: Rational choice, ignorance, and haste in political decision making. Advances in Austrian Economics, 8.Google Scholar
  3. Handwerk, B. (2005). New Orleans levees not built for worst case events. National Geographic News (September 2).Google Scholar
  4. Hobbes, T. (1648/1909). Leviathon Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kendall, J. S. (1922). History of New Orleans. Chicago: Lewis Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. McNabb, D., & Madere, L. E. L. (1991). A History of New Orleans. A web book available at http://www.madere.com/history.html.
  7. Montesquieu, C. (1748/1914). Spirit of the laws. London: G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Mueller, D. C. (2006, forthcoming). Federalism: a constitutional perspective. In R. D. Congleton, & B. Swedenborg (eds.), Democratic Constitutional Design: Analysis and Evidence. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.Google Scholar
  10. Reeves, S. (2005). Still we rise again. http://www.frenchquarter.com/history/KatrinaHistory.php.
  11. van Heerden, I. L., & Streva, K. (2004). Assessment and remediation of public health impacts due to hurricanes and major flooding events. Center for the Study of Public Health Impacts of Hurricanes, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EconomicsGeorge Mason UniversityFairfax

Personalised recommendations