Competition policy for elections: Do campaign contribution limits matter?
- 484 Downloads
This paper examines whether campaign contribution restrictions have consequences for election outcomes. States are a natural laboratory to examine this issue. We analyze elections to Assemblies from 1980 to 2001 and determine whether candidates' vote shares are altered by changes in state campaign contribution restrictions. We find that limits on giving narrow the margin of victory of the winning candidate. Limits lead to closer elections for future incumbents, but have less effect on the margin of victory of incumbents who passed the campaign finance legislation. We also find some evidence that contribution limits increase the number of candidates in the race.
KeywordsPublic Finance Election Outcome Competition Policy Vote Share State Campaign
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Feigenbaum, E. D., & Palmer, J. A. (1980–2000). Campaign Finance Law, Federal Election Commission, Bi-Annual Issues.Google Scholar
- Green, D., & Krasno, J. (1988). Salvation of the spendthrift incumbent: Reestimating the effects of campaign spending in House elections. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 363–372.Google Scholar
- Hogan, R. (2000). The Costs of Representation in State Legislatures: Explaining Variations in Campaign Spending, Social Science Quarterly, 81(4), 941–956.Google Scholar
- Kettl, D., et al. (1997). Report of the Commission, Vol. I, Governor's Blue-Ribbon Commission on Campaign Finance Reform, State of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
- Kousser, T., & LaRaja, R. (2000). How Do Campaign Finance Laws Shape Fundraising Patterns and Electoral Outcomes? Evidence from the States, Working paper.Google Scholar
- Kroszner, R. S., & Stratmann, T. (1998). Interest group competition and the organization of congress: Theory and evidence from financial services' political action committees. American Economic Review, 88, 1163–1187.Google Scholar
- Malbin, M. J., & Gais, T. L. (1998). The Day After Reform: Sobering Campaign Finance Lessons from the American States. Rockefeller Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Mayer, K. (1998). Public Financing and Electoral Competition in Minnesota and Wisconsin, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
- Milyo, J., Primo, D., & Groseclose, T. (2002). The Effects of State Campaign Finance Regulation on Turnout, Electoral Competition, and Partisan Advantage in Gubernatorial Elections, 1949–1998, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Ortuno-Ortin, I., & Schultz, C. (2000). Public Funding for Political Parties, CESifo Working Paper No. 368.Google Scholar
- Ramsden, G. P. (2002). State legislative campaign finance research: A review essay. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 2(2), 176–198.Google Scholar
- Redfield, K. D. (1995). Cah clout: Political Money in Illinois Legislative Elections. University of Illinois at Springfield.Google Scholar
- Redfield, K. D. (2001). Money Counts: How Dollars Dominate Illinois Politics and What We Can Do About It. Institute for Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Springfield.Google Scholar
- Smith, B. A. (1995). Campaign Finance Regulation: Faulty Assumptions and Undemocratic Consequences. Cato Policy Analysis, 238.Google Scholar
- Stratmann, T. (1995). Campaign contributions and congressional voting: Does the timing of contributions matter? Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(1).Google Scholar
- Thompson, J. A., & Moncrief, G. F. (eds.) (1998). Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections. Congressional Quarterly Books.Google Scholar
- Wittman, D. (2002). Candidate Quality, Pressure Group Endorsements, and Uninformed Voters, Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar