Competition policy for elections: Do campaign contribution limits matter?
Articles
Accepted:
- 480 Downloads
- 29 Citations
Abstract
This paper examines whether campaign contribution restrictions have consequences for election outcomes. States are a natural laboratory to examine this issue. We analyze elections to Assemblies from 1980 to 2001 and determine whether candidates' vote shares are altered by changes in state campaign contribution restrictions. We find that limits on giving narrow the margin of victory of the winning candidate. Limits lead to closer elections for future incumbents, but have less effect on the margin of victory of incumbents who passed the campaign finance legislation. We also find some evidence that contribution limits increase the number of candidates in the race.
Keywords
Public Finance Election Outcome Competition Policy Vote Share State Campaign
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Angrist, J. (1991). Grouped-data estimation and testing in simple labor-supply models. Journal of Econometrics, 47, 243–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ansolabehere, S., de Figueredo, J. M., & Snyder, J. (2003). Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), Winter, 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Austen-Smith, D. (1987). Interest groups, campaign contributions and probabilistic voting. Public Choice, 54, 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bronars, S. G., & Lott, J. R. Jr. (1997). Do campaign donations alter how a politician votes? Or, do donors support candidates who value the same things that they do? Journal of Law and Economics, 40(2), 317–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coate, S. (2004a). Political competition with campaign contributions and informative advertising. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(5), 772–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coate, S. (2004b). Pareto-improving campaign finance policy. The American Economic Review, 94(3), 628–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feigenbaum, E. D., & Palmer, J. A. (1980–2000). Campaign Finance Law, Federal Election Commission, Bi-Annual Issues.Google Scholar
- Gierzynski, A., & Breaux, D. (1991). Money and votes in state legislative election. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Green, D., & Krasno, J. (1988). Salvation of the spendthrift incumbent: Reestimating the effects of campaign spending in House elections. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 363–372.Google Scholar
- Grier, K. B. (1989). Campaign spending and senate elections, 1978–1984. Public Choice, 63(3), 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grier, K. B., & Munger M. C. (1991). Committee assignments, constituent preferences, and campaign contributions. Economic Inquiry, 29, 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gross, D. A., Goidel, R. K., & Shields, T. G. (2002). State campaign finance regulations and electoral competition. American Politics Research, 30(2), 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hogan, R. (2000). The Costs of Representation in State Legislatures: Explaining Variations in Campaign Spending, Social Science Quarterly, 81(4), 941–956.Google Scholar
- Jacobson, G. (1978). The effects of campaign spending on congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 72, 469–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kettl, D., et al. (1997). Report of the Commission, Vol. I, Governor's Blue-Ribbon Commission on Campaign Finance Reform, State of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
- Kousser, T., & LaRaja, R. (2000). How Do Campaign Finance Laws Shape Fundraising Patterns and Electoral Outcomes? Evidence from the States, Working paper.Google Scholar
- Kroszner, R. S., & Stratmann, T. (1998). Interest group competition and the organization of congress: Theory and evidence from financial services' political action committees. American Economic Review, 88, 1163–1187.Google Scholar
- Levitt, S. (1994). Using repeat challengers to estimate the effect of campaign spending on election outcomes in the U.S. house. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lott, J. R. (1987). The effect of nontransferable property rights on the efficiency of political markets. Journal of Public Economics, 31(2), 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Malbin, M. J., & Gais, T. L. (1998). The Day After Reform: Sobering Campaign Finance Lessons from the American States. Rockefeller Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Mayer, K. (1998). Public Financing and Electoral Competition in Minnesota and Wisconsin, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
- Milyo, J. (1997). The economics of campaign finance: FECA and the puzzle of the not very greedy grandfathers. Public Choice, 93, 245–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Milyo, J., Primo, D., & Groseclose, T. (2002). The Effects of State Campaign Finance Regulation on Turnout, Electoral Competition, and Partisan Advantage in Gubernatorial Elections, 1949–1998, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Milyo, J., & Groseclose, T. (1999). The electoral effects of incumbent wealth. Journal of Law and Economics, 42(2), 699–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mueller, D. C., & Stratmann, T. (1994). Informative and persuasive campaigning. Public Choice, 81(1), 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ortuno-Ortin, I., & Schultz, C. (2000). Public Funding for Political Parties, CESifo Working Paper No. 368.Google Scholar
- Potters, J., Sloof, R., & van Winden, F. (1997). Campaign expenditures, contributions, and direct endorsements: The strategic use of information and money to influence voter behavior. European Journal of Political Economy, 13, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prat, A. (2002a). Campaign advertising and voter welfare. Review of Economic Studies, 69(4), 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prat, A. (2002b). Campaign spending with office-seeking politicians, rational voters, and multiple lobbies. Journal of Economic Theory, 103(1), 162–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramsden, G. P. (2002). State legislative campaign finance research: A review essay. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 2(2), 176–198.Google Scholar
- Redfield, K. D. (1995). Cah clout: Political Money in Illinois Legislative Elections. University of Illinois at Springfield.Google Scholar
- Redfield, K. D. (2001). Money Counts: How Dollars Dominate Illinois Politics and What We Can Do About It. Institute for Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Springfield.Google Scholar
- Snyder, J. M., Jr. (1992). Long-term investing in politicians: Or, give early, give often. Journal of Law and Economics, 35, 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, B. A. (1995). Campaign Finance Regulation: Faulty Assumptions and Undemocratic Consequences. Cato Policy Analysis, 238.Google Scholar
- Stratmann, T. (1991). What do campaign contributions buy? Deciphering causal effects of money and votes. Southern Economic Journal, 57, 606–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stratmann, T. (1992). Are contributions rational? Untangling strategies of political action committees. Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), 647–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stratmann, T. (1995). Campaign contributions and congressional voting: Does the timing of contributions matter? Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(1).Google Scholar
- Stratmann, T. (1998). The market for congressional votes: Is the timing of contributions everything? Journal of Law and Economics, 41, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thompson, J. A., & Moncrief, G. F. (eds.) (1998). Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections. Congressional Quarterly Books.Google Scholar
- Wittman, D. (2002). Candidate Quality, Pressure Group Endorsements, and Uninformed Voters, Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006