Advertisement

Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 90, Issue 1, pp 117–128 | Cite as

Psychometric Testing of Three Chinese Online-Related Addictive Behavior Instruments among Hong Kong University Students

  • Chun-Wai Yam
  • Amir H. Pakpour
  • Mark D. Griffiths
  • Wai-Yan Yau
  • Cheuk-Long Matthew Lo
  • Jennifer M. T. Ng
  • Chung-Ying LinEmail author
  • Hildie Leung
Original Paper
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

Given that there is a lack of instruments assessing internet-related addictions among Chinese population, this study aimed to validate the Chinese version of the nine-item Internet Gaming Disorder Scales- Short Form (IGDS-SF9), Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), and Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS) among Hong Kong university students. Participants aged between 17 and 30 years participated in the present study (n = 307; 32.4% males; mean [SD] age = 21.64 [8.11]). All the participants completed the IGDS-SF9, BSMAS, SABAS, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were used to examine the factorial structures and the unidimensionality for IGDS-SF9, BSMAS, and SABAS. CFAs demonstrated that the three scales were all unidimensional with satisfactory fit indices: comparative fit index = 0.969 to 0.992. In addition, the IGDS-SF9 and BSMAS were slightly modified based on the modification index in CFA. The Chinese IGDS-SF9, BSMAS, and SABAS are valid instruments to assess the addiction levels of internet-related activities for Hong Kong university students.

Keywords

Online addiction Gaming addiction Smartphone addiction Social media addiction Addiction psychometrics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Faculty Collaborative Research Scheme between Social Sciences and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Pew Research Center. Smartphone Ownership and Internet Usage Continues to Climb in Emerging Economies. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/ . Published February 22, 2016. Accessed May 8, 2018.
  2. 2.
    Census and Statistical Department of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: 2017. Usage of Information Technology and the Internet by Hong Kong Residents, 2000 to 2016. Retrieved at: https://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B71711FB2017XXXXB0100.pdf. Published November 2017. Accessed May 2, 2018.
  3. 3.
    Yang SY, Chen MD, Huang YC, Lin CY, Chang JH. Association between smartphone use and musculoskeletal discomfort in adolescent students. J Community Health. 2017;42:423–30.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Online gaming addiction in children and adolescents: a review of empirical research. J Behav Addict. 2012;1:3–22.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng C, Li AY. Internet addiction prevalence and quality of (real) life: a meta-analysis of 31 nations across seven world regions. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17:755–60.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frascella J, Potenza MN, Brown LL, Childress AR. Shared brain vulnerabilities open the way for nonsubstance addictions: carving addiction at a new joint? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1187:294–315.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ha JH, Yoo HJ, Cho IH, Chin B, Shin D, Kim JH. Psychiatric comorbidity assessed in Korean children and adolescents who screen positive for internet addiction. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:821–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Psychiatry Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Karila L, Billieux J. Internet addiction: a systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:4026–52.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shek DT, Yu L. Adolescent internet addiction in Hong Kong: prevalence, change, and correlates. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29(1):S22–30.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sigerson L, Li AY, Cheung MW, Luk JW, Cheng C. Psychometric properties of the Chinese internet gaming disorder scale. Addict Behav. 2017;74:20–6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pontes HM, Griffiths MD. Measuring DSM-5 internet gaming disorder: development and validation of a short psychometric scale. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;45:137–43.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pontes HM, Stavropoulos V, Griffiths MD. Measurement invariance of the internet gaming disorder scale–short-form (IGDS9-SF) between the United States of America, India and the United Kingdom. Psychiatry Res. 2017;257:472–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pontes HM, Griffiths MD. Portuguese validation of the internet gaming disorder scale–short-form. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;19(4):288–93.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0605.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Monacis L, Palo VD, Griffiths MD, Sinatra M. Validation of the internet gaming disorder scale–short-form (IGDS9-SF) in an Italian-speaking sample. J Behav Addict. 2016;5(4):683–90.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu TY, Lin CY, Årestedt K, Griffiths MD, Broström A, Pakpour AH. Psychometric validation of the Persian nine-item internet gaming disorder scale–short form: does gender and hours spent online gaming affect the interpretations of item descriptions? J Behav Addict. 2017;6(2):256–63.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schivinski B, Brzozowska-Woś M, Buchanan EM, Griffiths MD, Pontes HM. Psychometric assessment of the Internet Gaming Disorder diagnostic criteria: An Item Response Theory study. Addict Behav Rep. 2018; Epub ahead of print.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2018.06.004.
  19. 19.
    de Palo V, Monacis L, Sinatra M, et al. Measurement invariance of the nine-item Internet Gaming Disorder Scale (IGDS9-SF) across Albania, United States of America, United Kingdom, and Italy. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2018; Epub ahead of print.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9925-5.
  20. 20.
    Arıcak OT, Dinç M, Yay M, Griffiths MD. Adapting the short form of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale into Turkish: validity and reliability. Addicta: the Turkish Journal on Addictions. 2018; Epub ahead of print.  https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2019.6.1.0027.
  21. 21.
    Evren C, Dalbudak E, Topcu M, Kutlu N, Evren B, Pontes HM. Psychometric validation of the Turkish nine-item internet gaming disorder scale–short form (IGDS9-SF). Psychiatry Res. 2018;265:349–54.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andreassen CS, Billieux J, Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, Demetrovics Z, Mazzoni E, et al. The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychol Addict Behav. 2016;30(2):252–62.  https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000160.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Griffiths M. Internet addiction-time to be taken seriously? Addict Res. 2000;8(5):413–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Monacis L, De Palo V, Griffiths MD, Sinatra M. Social networking addiction, attachment style, and validation of the Italian version of the Bergen social media addiction scale. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(2):178–86.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin CY, Broström A, Nilsen P, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. Psychometric validation of the Persian Bergen social media addiction scale using classic test theory and Rasch models. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(4):620–9.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pontes HM, Andreassen CS, Griffiths MD. Portuguese validation of the Bergen Facebook addiction scale: an empirical study. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2016;14:1062–73.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Griffiths M. A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. J Subst Abus. 2005;10:191–7.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Csibi S, Griffiths MD, Cook B, Demetrovics Z, Szabo A. The psychometric properties of the smartphone application-based addiction scale (SABAS). Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2018;16(2):393–403.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Csibi S, Demetrovics Z, Szabo A. Hungarian adaptation and psychometric characteristics of Brief Addiction to Smartphone Scale (BASS) [in Hungarian]. Psychiatr Hung. 2016;31(1):71–7.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chan YF, Leung DYP, Fong DY, Leung CM, Lee AM. Psychometric evaluation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in a large community sample of adolescents in Hong Kong. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(6):865–73.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jette DU, Warren RL, Wirtalla C. Functional independence domains in patients receiving rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities: evaluation of psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(6):1089–94.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cheng CP, Luh WM, Yang AL, Su CT, Lin CY. Agreement of children and parents scores on Chinese version of pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0: further psychometric development. Appl Res Qual Life. 2016;11(3):891–906.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang YS, Wang HY, Shee DY. Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: scale development and validation. Comput Hum Behav. 2007;23(4):1792–808.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 1980;88:588–606.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stavropoulos V, Beard C, Griffiths MD, Buleigh T, Gomez R, Pontes HM. Measurement invariance of the internet gaming disorder scale–short-form (IGDS9-SF) between Australia, the USA, and the UK. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2018;16(2):377–92.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen SH, Wang PW, Chen CS, Yen CF. Evaluation of the diagnostic criteria of internet gaming disorder in the DSM-5 among young adults in Taiwan. J Psychiatr Res. 2014;53:103–10.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Andreassen CS, Pallesen S, Griffiths MD. The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: findings from a large national survey. Addict Behav. 2017;64:287–93.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maier C. Laumer S., Eckhardt A., Weitzel T. (2012). When social networking turns to social overload: explaining the stress, emotional exhaustion, and quitting behavior from social network sites’ users. Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). Published May 15, 2012. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1070&context=ecis2012. Accessed July 29, 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social SciencesThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung HomHong Kong
  2. 2.Social Determinants of Health Research CenterQazvin University of Medical SciencesQazvinIran
  3. 3.Department of Nursing, School of Health and WelfareJönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  4. 4.International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology DepartmentNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK
  5. 5.Department of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social SciencesThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung HomHong Kong

Personalised recommendations