Advertisement

Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 89, Issue 3, pp 621–629 | Cite as

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Nepean Dysphoria Scale in a Clinical Sample

  • David BerleEmail author
  • Vladan Starcevic
  • Kirupamani Viswasam
  • Denise Milicevic
  • Anthony Hannan
  • Vlasios Brakoulias
  • Zachary Steel
Original Paper
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

The construct of dysphoria has been described inconsistently across a broad range of psychopathology. The term has been used to refer to an irritable state of discontent, but is also thought to incorporate anger, resentment and nonspecific symptoms associated with anxiety and depression, such as tension and unhappiness. The Nepean Dysphoria Scale has been developed to allow assessment of dysphoria, but its factor structure has not yet been investigated in clinical samples. We aimed to determine the latent structure of dysphoria as reflected by the Nepean Dysphoria Scale, using a clinical sample. Adults (N = 206) seeking treatment at a range of mental health services were administered the Nepean Dysphoria Scale. Four putative factor structures were investigated using confirmatory factor analysis: a single-factor model, a hierarchical model, a bifactor model and a four-factor model as identified in previous studies. No model fit the data except for a four-factor model when a revised 22-item version of the original 24-item scale was investigated. A four-factor structure similar to that identified in non-clinical samples was supported, albeit following the removal of two items. The Nepean Dysphoria Scale appears to have utility for the assessment of dysphoria in routine clinical settings.

Keywords

Psychometric Clinical sample Validity Construct Scale Interpersonal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dominic Hilbrink, Laura Hardaker, Clare Russell-Williams, Rachel Kiely and all of the allied health staff at St John of God Health Care Richmond Hospital are thanked for their assistance with participant recruitment. Brian Skepper and Erin Dale of the Nepean Anxiety Disorders Clinic also assisted with participant recruitment.

Funding

This research was supported by a Defence Health Foundation Grant awarded to the first and last authors (DB & ZS).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Human Participants and Animal Studies

All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref 07/068–07/NEPEAN/14) and the St John of God Health Care Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 839).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Starcevic V, Rossi Monti M, D’Agostino A, Berle D. Will DSM-5 make us feel dysphoric? Conceptualisation(s) of dysphoria in the most recent classification of mental disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013;47:954–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berle D, Moulds ML. Emotional reasoning processes and dysphoric mood: cross-sectional and prospective relationships. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e67359.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellis AJ, Beevers CG, Wells TT. Emotional dysregulation in dysphoria: support for emotion context insensitivity in response to performance-based feedback. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2009;40:443–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teasdale JD, Cox SG. Dysphoria: self-devaluative and affective components in recovered depressed patients and never depressed controls. Psychol Med. 2001;31:1311–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beek TF, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Kreukels BPC. Gender incongruence/gender dysphoria and its classification history. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28:5–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simms LJ, Watson D, Doebbeling BN. Confirmatory factor analyses of posttraumatic stress symptoms in deployed and nondeployed veterans of the Gulf war. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111:637–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rossi Monti M, D'Agostino A. Borderline personality disorder from a psychopathological-dynamic perspective. J Psychopathol. 2014;20:451–61.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Musalek M, Griengl H, Hobl B, Sachs G, Zoghlami A. Dysphoria from a transnosological perspective. Psychopathology. 2000;33:209–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Starcevic V. Dysphoric about dysphoria: towards a greater conceptual clarity of the term. Australas Psychiatry. 2007;15:9–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Starcevic V, Berle D, Viswasam K, Hannan A, Milicevic D, Brakoulias V, et al. Specificity of the relationships between dysphoria and related constructs in an outpatient sample. Psychiatry Q. 2015;86:459–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erbes CR, Meis LA, Polusny MA, Compton JS, Wadsworth SM. An examination of PTSD symptoms and relationship functioning in US soldiers of the Iraq war over time. J Trauma Stress. 2012;25:187–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berle D, Starcevic V. Preliminary validation of the Nepean dysphoria scale. Australas Psychiatry. 2012;20:322–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D’Agostino A, Manganelli E, Aportone A, Rossi Monti M, Starcevic V. Development, cross-cultural adaptation process and preliminary validation of the Italian version of the Nepean dysphoria scale. J Psychopathol. 2016;22:149–56.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caspi A, Houts RM, Belsky DW, Goldman-Mellor SJ, Harrington H, Israel S, et al. The p factor: one general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clin Psychol Sci. 2014;2:119–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beauducel A, Herzberg PY. On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Struct Equ Model. 2006;13:186–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu L-I, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gootzeit J, Markon K. Factors of PTSD: differential specificity and external correlates. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31:993–1003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of HealthUniversity of Technology SydneyUltimoAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Sydney Medical School – Nepean, Discipline of PsychiatryUniversity of SydneySydney/PenrithAustralia
  4. 4.Department of PsychiatryNepean HospitalPenrithAustralia
  5. 5.Nepean Anxiety Disorders ClinicNepean Blue Mountains Local Health DistrictPenrithAustralia
  6. 6.St John of God Health CareRichmond HospitalNorth RichmondAustralia
  7. 7.Black Dog InstituteRandwickAustralia

Personalised recommendations