Advertisement

Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 349–358 | Cite as

Does Sexy Media Promote Teen Sex? A Meta-Analytic and Methodological Review

  • Christopher J. FergusonEmail author
  • Rune K. L. Nielsen
  • Patrick M. Markey
Original Paper

Abstract

Parents and policy makers are often concerned that sexy media (media depicting or discussing sexual encounters) may promote sexual behavior in young viewers. There has been some debate among scholars regarding whether such media promote sexual behaviors. It remains unclear to what extent sexy media is a risk factor for increased sexual behavior among youth. The current study employed a meta-analysis of 22 correlational and longitudinal studies of sexy media effects on teen sexual behavior (n = 22,172). Moderator analyses examined methodological and science culture issues such as citation bias. Results indicated the presence only of very weak effects. General media use did not correlate with sexual behaviors (r = 0.005), and sexy media use correlated only weakly with sexual behaviors (r = 0.082) once other factors had been controlled. Higher effects were seen for studies with citation bias, and lower effects when family environment is controlled. The impact of media on teen sexuality was minimal with effect sizes near to zero.

Keywords

Mass media Sexuality Adolescents Television 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest to report.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Chandra A, Martino S, Miu A, et al.: Does watching sex on television predict teen pregnancy? Findings from a national longitudinal survey of youth. Pediatrics 122(5):1047–1054, 2008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown J, L’Engle K, Pardun C, Guo G, Kenneavy K, Jackson C: Sexy media matter: Exposure to sexual content in music, movies, television, and magazines predicts Black and White adolescents’ sexual behavior. Pediatrics 117:1018–1027, 2006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gottfried J, Vaala S, Bleakley A, Hennessy M, Jordan A: Does the effect of exposure to TV sex on adolescent sexual behavior vary by genre? Communication Research 40(1):73–95, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steinberg L, Monahan K: Adolescents’ exposure to sexy media does not hasten the initiation of sexual intercourse. Developmental Psychology 47(2):562–576, 2011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martino S, Collins R, Kanouse D, Elliott M, Berry S: Social cognitive processes mediating the relationship between exposure to television’s sexual content and adolescents’ sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social 89(6):914–924, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collins R, Martino S, Elliott M, Miu A: Relationships between adolescent sexual outcomes and exposure to sex in media: Robustness to propensity-based analysis. Developmental Psychology 47(2):585–591, 2011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Savage J, Yancey C: The effects of media violence exposure on criminal aggression: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior 35(6):772–791, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosenthal R, DiMatteo M: Meta analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology 52:59–82, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farley J, Lehmann D, Sawyer A: Empirical marketing generalization using meta-analysis. Marketing Science 14:G36–G46, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raju N, Fralicx R, Steinhaus S: Covariance and regression slope models for studying validity generalization. Applied Psychological Measurement 10(2):195–211, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferguson C: Pay no attention to that data behind the curtain: On angry birds, happy children, scholarly squabbles, publication bias, and why betas rule metas. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10(5):683–691, 2015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Furuya-Kanamori L, Doi SA: Angry Birds, Angry Children, and Angry Meta-Analysts: A Reanalysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11(3):408–414, 2016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hennessy M, Bleakley A, Fishbein M, Jordan A: Estimating the longitudinal association between adolescent sexual behavior and exposure to sexual media content. Journal of Sex Research 46(6):586–596, 2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bleakley A, Hennessy M, Fishbein M, Jordan A: Using the integrative model to explain how exposure to sexual media content influences adolescent sexual behavior. Health Education & Behavior 38(5):530–540, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferguson C: Do angry birds make for angry children? A meta-analysis of video game influences on children’s and adolescents’ aggression, mental health, prosocial behavior, and academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10(5):646–666, 2015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunter J, Schmidt F: Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferguson C, Brannick M: Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. Psychological Methods 17(1):120–128, 2012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ferguson C, Ivory J, Beaver K: Genetic, maternal, school, intelligence, and media use predictors of adult criminality: A longitudinal test of the catalyst model in adolescence through early adulthood. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 22(5):447–460, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Widman L, Choukas-Bradley S, Noar SM, Nesi J, Garrett K: Parent-adolescent sexual communication and adolescent safer sex behavior: A meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics 170(1):52–61, 2016. doi:  10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2731 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robinson-Cimpian J: Conclusions inaccurate estimation of disparities due to mischievous responders: Several suggestions to assess conclusions. Educational Researcher 43:171–185, 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher J. Ferguson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rune K. L. Nielsen
    • 2
  • Patrick M. Markey
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStetson UniversityDelandUSA
  2. 2.IT University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Villanova UniversityVillanovaUSA

Personalised recommendations