The literature has seen a surge in research on the mental health impacts of technologies such as Facebook, video games, and massively-multiplayer online role-playing games such as World of Warcraft, but little is known regarding the mental health impact of non-video role-playing games, such as Dungeons & Dragons. The present study examines how psychiatrists’ perceive role-playing games and whether they play them. Psychiatrists at a tertiary care centre in Canada completed a questionnaire assessing history of playing role-playing games and whether they associate them with psychopathology. Forty-eight psychiatrists responded. Twenty-three percent have played a role-playing game over their lifetimes. Twenty-two percent believed there was an association between psychopathology and role-playing games. A majority of psychiatrists who responded do not associate role-playing games with psychopathology. Implications for clinical practice and future research are discussed.
Role-playing games Dungeons & Dragons Stereotypes Psychiatrists
Longman H, O’Connor E, Obst P: The effect of social support derived from World of Warcraft on negative psychological symptoms. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 12:563–566, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlikowski M, Brand M: Excessive Internet gaming and decision making: do excessive World of Warcraft players have problems in decision making under risky conditions? Psychiatry Research 188:428–433, 2011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Peters CS, Malesky LA: Problematic usage among highly-engaged players of massively multiplayer online role playing games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 11:481–484, 2008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Abyeta S, Forest J: Relationship of role-playing games to self-reported criminal behaviour. Psychological Reports 69:1187–1192, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll JL, Carolin PM: Relationship between game playing and personality. Psychological Reports 64:705–706, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGeest JB, Johnson TP, Welch VL: Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review. Evaluation & the Health Professions 30:303–321, 2007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar