Advertisement

Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 85, Issue 3, pp 329–343 | Cite as

Early Report on the Effectiveness of a Recovery Model Oriented Therapeutic Community for Individuals with Complex and Persistent Recovery Challenges

  • Sharon Young
  • Lisa Schactman
  • Matt SnyderEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This study summarizes the results of a 10 year longitudinal study of individual recovery progress within a residential program based upon therapeutic community principles and a Seven Domains Enhanced Recovery Model that emerged from a grounded theory analysis of real life recovery experiences (Young and Ensing, Psychiatr Rehab J 22:219–231, 1999). The four primary hypotheses of the study predicted significant and moderately sized effect sizes on a holistic set of measures, corresponding to the Enhanced Recovery Model. Results indicate support for all hypotheses; statistically significant and moderate to large effects were found in all domain measures for the participants, most of whom had multiple unsuccessful previous treatment attempts. These results indicate that this theoretical structure and residential model is effective in supporting recovery for individuals with complex and persistent challenges across the broad range of recovery domains. Conceptually, this also adds quantitative support for the Seven Domains Enhanced Recovery Model, complementing previous qualitative studies.

Keywords

Severe and persistent Recovery Residential Therapeutic Community Effectiveness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dan and Jeannine Keller, Tonya Van-Diense, CooperRiis healing farm, Scott Warren, and all of the residents and families that have participated in various aspects of this study. We would also like to thank Dr. Lisa Rue, Karen Traxler, Mary Seigrist, Tyler Kincaid and Suzy Landrum from the University of Northern Colorado, for their consultation, guidance and collaboration.

References

  1. 1.
    Newman MG, Stiles WB: Therapeutic factors in treating anxiety disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology 62:649–659, 2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wampold BE: The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods, and Findings. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asay TP, Lambert, MJ: The Empirical Case for the Common Factors in Therapy: Quantitative Findings. In: Hubble MA, Duncan BL, Miller SD The Heart and Soul of Change: What Works in Therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Portugal EMM, Cevada T, Monteiro-Junior RS., Guimaraes TT., da Cruz Rubini E, Lattari E, Blois C, Deslandes AC: Neuroscience of exercise: From neurobiology mechanisms to mental health. Neuropsychobiology 68:1–14, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen SC, Change C, Tsai H, Chen S, Lin CCH: Superior antidepressant effect occurring 1 month after rTMS: Add-on rTMS for subjects with medication-resistant depression. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 9:397–401, 2013.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Leon G: The next therapeutic community: Autocracy, and other notes towards integrating old and new therapeutic communities. Therapeutic Communities 33:124–132, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hustoft HH, Knut LA, Moller L, Danbolt P, Johan L: “If I didn’t have my faith I would have killed myself!”: Spiritual coping in patients suffering from schizophrenia. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 23:126–144, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baer RA, Carmody J, Hunsinger M: Weekly change in mindfulness and perceived stress in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Clinical Psychology 68:755–765, 2012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stiles WB: Responsiveness as an obstacle for psychotherapy outcome research: It’s worse than you think. Clinial Psychology Science and Practice 16:86–91, 2009.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kraus MS, Lutz W: Process transforms inputs to determine outcomes: Therapists are responsible for managing process. Clinial Psychology 16:73–81, 2009.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lincoln TM, Ziegler M, Mehl S, Kesting M, Lullmann E, Westermann S, Rief W: Moving from efficacy to effectiveness in cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis: A randomized clinical practice trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 80:674–86, 2012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Binks C, Fenton M, McCarthy L, Lee T, Adams CE, Duggan C: Psychological therapies for people with Borderline Personality Disorder (Review). In the Cochrane Collaboration. Hoboken, Wiley, 2009.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME: Schema Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide.: New York, Guilford Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Young JE: An integrative schema-focused model for personality disorders. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 6:11, 1992.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Linehan M: Dialectical Behavior Therapy for borderline personality disorder: Theory and method. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 51:261–276, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Linehan M: Cognitive Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disoder.New York, Guilford Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clarkin JF, Levy KN, Lenzenweger MF, Kernberg OF: Evaluating three treatments for Borderline Personality Disorder: A multiwave study. American Journal of Psychiatry 164:922–928, 2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fonagy P, Luyten P: A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology 21:1355–1381, 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eizirik M, Fonagy P: Mentalization-based treatment for patients with borderline personality disorder: an overview. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 31:72–75, 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Geisen-bloo J, van Dick R, Spinhoven P, van Tilburg W, Dirksen C, van Asselt T, Kremers I, Nadort M, Arntz A: Outpatient psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: Randomized trial of Schema-Focused Therapy vs. Transference-Focused Psychotherapy, Archives of General Psychiatry 63:649–658, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leichsenring F, Rabung S: Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. JAMA 300:1551–1565, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bliss S, McCardle M: An exploration of common elements in dialectical behavior therapy, mentalization based treatment and transference focused psychotherapy in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Clinical Social Work Journal 42:61–69, 2013.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Madedd F, Aquaro P, Preti E: Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: A review of literature on the efficacy of four manualized treatments. Journal of Psychopathology 18:196–209, 2012.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Doering S, Horz S, Rentrop M, Fischer-Kern M, Schuster P, Benecke C, Buchheim A, Martius P, Buchheim P: Tranference-focused psychotherapy v. treatment by community psychotherapists for borderline personality disorder: Randomized controlled trial. BJP 196:389–395, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chiesa M, Fonagy P:Psychosocial treatment for severe personality disorder: 36 month follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry 183:356–362, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chiesa M, Bateman A, Wilberg T, Friis S: Patients’ characteristics, outcomes and cost-benefit of hospital-based treatment for patients with personality disorder: A comparison of three different programes. Psychology and Psychotherapy 75:381–392, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chiesa M, Fonagy P, Bateman AW, Mace C: Psychiatric morbidity and treatment pathway outcomes of patients presenting to specialist NHS psychodynamic psychotherapy services: Results from a multi-centre study. Psychology and Psychotherapy :82:83–98, 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Binder P, Holgersen H, Nielsen G.H: What is a “good outcome” in psychotherapy? A qualitative exploration of former patient’s point of view. Psychotherapy Research 20:285–294, 2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Young SL, Ensing S: Exploring recovery from the perspective of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 22:219–231, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Campling P, Haigh R (Eds.): Therapeutic Community: Past, Present and future. In: Therapeutic Communities Book 2, 2nd edn., London, Jessica Kingsley Publications, 1999.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health: Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health in America. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2003.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ralph R., Corrigan P (Eds.): Recovery in Mental Illness: Broadening our Understanding of Wellness. Washington DC, American Psychological Association Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gerhart DR: The mental health recovery movement and family therapy, part I: consumer-led reform of services to persons diagnosed with severe mental illness. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 38:429–442, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR, Holleran SA, Irving LM, Sigmon ST, Yoshinobu L, Gibb J, Langelle C, Harney P: The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60:570–585, 1991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Young SL, Ensing DE, Bullock WA: The Mental Health Recovery Measure. In: Campbell-Orde T, Chamberlin J, Carpenter J, Less HS (Eds) Measuring the Promise: A Compendium of Recovery Measures, II, Cambridge, Human Services Research Institute, 2005.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Snell WE, Johnson G, Lloyd PJ, Hoover MW: The Health Orientation Scale: A measure of psychological tendencies associated with health. European Journal of Personality 5:169–183, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rogers ES, Chamberlin J, Ellison ML, Crean T: A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services 48:1042–1047, 1997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Carpinello SE, Knight EL, Markowitz FE, Pease EA: The development of the Mental Health Confidence Scale: A measure of self-efficacy in individuals diagnosed with mental disorders. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 23:236–243, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Crumbaugh JC, Maholick LT. An experimental study in existentialism: The psychometric approach to Frankl’s concept of Noogenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology 20:200–207, 1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Russel DW: UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment 66:20–40, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hatch RL, Burg MA, Naberhaus DS, Hellmich LK: The Spiritual Involvement and Beliefs Scale: Development and testing of a new instrument. Journal of Family Practice 46:476–486, 1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N: The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine 13:595–605, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Derogatis LR, Cleary PA: Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL-90: A study in construct validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology 33:981–989, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edn., text rev.). Washington DC, Author, 2000.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, Cohen, J: The Global Assessment Scale. Archives of General Psychiatry 33:766–771, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cohen, J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn., Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1988.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Neimeyer H, Musch J, Pietrowsky R: Publication bias in meta-analyses for the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 81:58–74, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Groth-Marnat, G: Handbook of psychological assessment, 4th edn., Hoboken, Wiley, 2003.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fowler JC, Ackerman SJ, Speanburg S, Bailey A, Blagys M: Personality and symptom change in treatment-refractory inpatients: Evaluation of the phase model of change using rorschach, TAT, and DSM-IV axis V. Journal of Personality Assessment 83:306–322, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CooperRiis Healing FarmMill SpringUSA

Personalised recommendations