Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 81–96 | Cite as

Revisiting the Psychiatric Day Hospital Experience 6 Months After Discharge: How Was the Transition and What Have Clients Retained?

  • Nadine LarivièreEmail author
  • Johanne Desrosiers
  • Michel Tousignant
  • Richard Boyer
Original Paper


Psychiatric day hospitals offer intensive short-term multidisciplinary treatment. No study has examined in more depth the impact of this therapeutic experience in the life of participants and what they retained from their participation after discharge. A qualitative design using semi-structured individual interviews was completed with 18 participants of different gender, age and diagnosis, treated in a day hospital, 6 months after discharge. Interview themes addressed events and changes since discharge, learnings retained, appreciated components and suggestions. Results showed that the day hospital experience was particularly helpful to improve symptoms and relationship with self. It activated a self-transformation process that continued afterwards. Termination created for many an abrupt void. Issues at stake during the first 6 months were continuity of care, social support and putting learnings into practice. The program offered at the day hospital was generally appreciated but management of the waiting time and linkage to outpatient services needed improvement.


Psychiatric day hospital Qualitative impact over time Program evaluation 



The authors first wish to offer their most sincere gratitude to the 18 participants who accepted to share their moving journeys. Special thanks to Mrs. Mélanie Couture and Laurence Melançon for their precious input. Finally, we would like to acknowledge the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Association des Hôpitaux de Jour en Psychiatrie du Québec, Réseau Québécois de la Recherche sur le Vieillissement, the Canadian Occupational Therapy Foundation and the Centre de recherche Fernand-Seguin for their financial support.


  1. 1.
    Casarino JP, Wilner M, Maxey JT: American association for partial hospitalization (AAPH) standards and guidelines for partial hospitalization. International Journal of Partial Hospitalization 1:5–21, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Larivière N, Melançon L, Fortier L, et al.: A qualitative analysis of clients’ evaluation of a psychiatric day hospital. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 28:165–179, 2009Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horvitz-Lennon M, Normand S-LT, Graccione P, et al.: Partial versus full hospitalization for adults in psychiatric distress: A systematic review of the published literature (1957-1997). American Journal of Psychiatry 158:676–685, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marshall M, Crowther R, Almaraz-Serrano A, et al.: Acute day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders. Health Technology Assessment 5:1–75, 2001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kallert TW, Priebe S, McCabe R, et al.: Are day hospitals effective for acutely ill psychiatric patients? A European multicenter randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 68:278–287, 2007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Priebe S, Jones G, McCabe R, et al.: Effectiveness and costs of acute day hospital treatment compared with conventional in-patient care/randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 188:243–249, 2006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glick ID, Fleming L, DeChillo N, et al.: A controlled study of transitional day care for non-chronically-ill patients. American Journal of Psychiatry 143:1551–1556, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dick PH, Sweeney ML, Crombie IK: Controlled comparison of day-patient and out-patient treatment for persistent anxiety and depression. British Journal of Psychiatry 158:24–27, 1991CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sledge WH, Tebes J, Rakfeldt J, et al.: Day hospital/Crisis respite care versus inpatient car, part I: Clinical outcomes. American Journal of Psychiatry 153:1065–1073, 1996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elbeck M, Fecteau G: Improving the validity of measures of patient satisfaction with psychiatric care and treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 41:998–1001, 1990Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Linder-Pelz S: Toward a theory of patient satisfaction. Social Science and Medicine 16:577–579, 1982CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ruggeri M: Patients’ and relatives’ satisfaction with psychiatric services: The state of the art of its measurement. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 29:212–227, 1994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Creswell JW: Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design/Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE, 2007Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mirin SM, Namerow MJ: Why study treatment outcome? Hospital and Community Psychiatry 42:1007–1013, 1991Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miles MB, Huberman AM: Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications, 1994Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poupart J, Deslauriers J-P, Groulx L-H, et al.: La recherche qualitative/Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques. Boucherville, Québec, Canada, Gaëtan Morin Éditeur, 1997Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ware JE Jr, Davies AR: Behavioral consequences of consumer dissatisfaction with medical care. Evaluation and Program Planning 6:291–297, 1983CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Corbière M, Lesage A, Lauzon S, et al.: Validation française du questionnaire «Verona Service Satisfaction Scale» VSSS-54F. L’Encéphale 29:110–118, 2003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ruggeri M, Dall’Agnola R: The development and use of the Verona expectations for care scale (VECS) and the Verona service satisfaction scale (VSSS) for measuring expectations and satisfaction with community-based psychiatric services in patients, relatives and professionals. Psychological Medicine 23:511–523, 1993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruggeri M, Lasalvia A, Dall’Agnola R, et al.: Development, internal consistency and reliability of the Verona service satisfaction scale-European version/EPSILON study 7. British Journal of Psychiatry 177(suppl. 39):s41–s48, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Serero M, Gagnon J: Portrait des hôpitaux de jour en psychiatrie adulte au Québec. Québec, Canada, Association des hôpitaux du Québec, 2000Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kielhofner G: Model of Human Occupation/Theory and Application. Philadelphia, PA, Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith JA, Osborn M: Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In: Smith JA (Ed.) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications, 2003Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoge MA, Farrell SP, Munchel ME, et al.: Therapeutic factors in partial hospitalization. Psychiatry 51:199–210,1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yalom ID, Leszcz M: The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. New York, Basic Books, 2005.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wills TA, Shinar O: Measuring Perceived and Received Social Support. In: Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH (Eds.) Social Support Measurement and Intervention. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilcock AA: Relationship of Occupations to Health and Well-being. In: Christiansen CH, Baum CM (Eds.) Occupational Therapy/Performance, Participation, and Well-Being. Thorofare, NJ, SLACK Inc., 2005Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Davidson L, O’Connell MJ, Tondora J, et al.: Recovery in Serious Mental Illness: Paradigm Shift or Shibboleth? In: Davidson L, Harding C, Spaniol L (Eds.) Recovery from Severe Mental Illnesses: Research Evidence and Implications for Practice. Boston, MA, Boston University, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 2005Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Piat M, Sabetti J, Couture A, et al.: What does recovery mean for me? Perspectives of Canadian mental health consumers. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 32 :199–207, 2009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Young SL, Ensing DS: Exploring recovery from the perspective of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 22:219–231, 1999Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roe D, Chopra M: Beyond coping with mental illness: Toward personal growth. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 73:334–344, 2003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schreer H: Therapeutic factors in psychiatric day hospital treatment. International Journal of Partial Hospitalization 5:307–319, 1988Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dixon L, Goldberg R, Iannone V, et al.: Use of a critical time intervention to promote continuity of care after psychiatric inpatient hospitalization. Psychiatric Services 60:451–458, 2009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Prince JD: Practices preventing rehospitalization of individuals with schizophrenia. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 194:397–403, 2006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Boyer CA, McAlpine DD, Pottick KJ, et al.: Identifying risk factors and key strategies in linkage to outpatient psychiatric care. American Journal of Psychiatry 157:1592–1598, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goldacre M, Seagroatt V, Hawton K: Suicide after discharge from psychiatric inpatient care. Lancet 342:283–286, 1993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reis HT, Collins N: Measuring Relationship Properties and Interactions Relevant to Social Support. In: Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH (Eds.) Social Support Measurement and Intervention. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Olfson M, Mechanic D, Boyer CA, et al.: Linking inpatients with schizophrenia to outpatient care. Psychiatric Services 49:911–917, 1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hendryx M, Green CA, Perrin NA: Social support, activities, and recovery from serious mental illness: STARS study findings. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 36:320–329, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Aubin G, Hachey R, Mercier C: La signification des activités quotidiennes chez les personnes souffrant de troubles mentaux graves. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 69:218–228, 2002Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bejerholm U, Eklund M: Occupational engagement in persons with schizophrenia: Relationships to self-related variables, psychopathology, and quality of life. American Journal of Psychiatry 61:21–32, 2007Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Eklund M, Leufstadius C: Occupational factors and aspects of health and wellbeing in individuals with persistent mental illness living in the community. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 74:303–313, 2007Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Goldberg B, Britnell ES, Goldberg J: The relationship between engagement in meaningful activities and quality of life in persons disabled by mental illness. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health 18:17–44, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Halford WK, Harrison C, Kalyansundaram V, et al.: Preliminary results from a psychoeducational program to rehabilitate chronic patients. Psychiatric Services 46:1189–1191, 1995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Leff J, Thornicroft G, Coxhead N, et al.: The TAPS project. 22: A five-year follow-up of long-stay psychiatric patients discharged to the community. British Journal of Psychiatry Supplement 25:13–17, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mairs H, Bradshaw T: Life skills training in schizophrenia. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 67:217–224, 2004Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Thorup A, Petersen L, Jeppesen P, et al.: Integrated treatment ameliorates negative symptoms in first episode in psychosis-results form the Danish OPUS trial. Schizophrenia Research 79:95–105, 2005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Myin-Germeys I, Nicolson N, Delespaul P: The context of delusional experiences in the daily life of patients with schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine 31:489–498, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Eklund M, Leufstadius C, Bejerholm U: Time use among people with psychiatric disabilities: Implications for practice. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 32:177–191, 2009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadine Larivière
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
    Email author
  • Johanne Desrosiers
    • 1
    • 3
  • Michel Tousignant
    • 1
    • 3
  • Richard Boyer
    • 4
    • 2
  1. 1.School of RehabilitationUniversité de SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada
  2. 2.Centre de recherche Fernand-Seguin, Hôpital Louis-H LafontaineMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Research Centre on AgingSherbrookeCanada
  4. 4.Université de MontréalMontrealCanada
  5. 5.École de réadaptationFaculté de médecine et des sciences de la santéSherbrookeCanada

Personalised recommendations