PROSPECTS

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 411–419 | Cite as

Global university rankings: The “Olympic Games” of higher education?

  • Maria Yudkevich
  • Philip G. Altbach
  • Laura E. Rumbley
Viewpoints/Controversies

Abstract

Global university rankings are often thought of as games, defined by roles and rules that universities must play in order to confirm their legitimacy and gain visibility as actors in the global academic market. While some countries are well represented at the top of rankings charts, others are just joining the race and testing out different strategies to improve their positions. We use the metaphor of the Olympic Games to highlight some important characteristics of the high-stakes, highly competitive contests represented by global university rankings, and the role of rankings in the international higher education system in general. This comparison also allows for a better understanding of the limitations that exist in using ranking positions as an indicator of system success, and why universities should approach the rankings game with caution.

Keywords

Higher education Global ranking International Excellence  

References

  1. Alexeev, O. (2014). First steps of Russian universities to top-100 global university rankings. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 1, 6–7. http://herb.hse.ru/data/2014/05/30/1325398755/1HERB_01_Spring.pdf#page=6
  2. Bale, J. (1991). The brawn drain: Foreign student athletes in American universities. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  3. BBC [British Broadcasting Corporation] (2014). France plans elite top-10 mega-university. BBC.com. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-30347441
  4. BBC (2015, June 7). “Russia & Qatar may lose World Cups”—Fifa official. BBC.com. http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/33041467
  5. CWTS [Center for Science and Technology Studies] (2015). CWTS Leiden ranking: Methodology. http://www.leidenranking.com/methodology/datacollection
  6. IOC [International Olympic Committee] (2015). What is the Olympic motto? http://registration.olympic.org/en/faq/detail/id/29
  7. IREG [International Ranking Expert Group Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence] (2015). IREG inventory on national rankings 2015: Final report. http://ireg-observatory.org/en/pdfy/IRE_Inventory_on_National_Rankings_final_report.pdf
  8. Merriam-Webster (2015). Definition of “game”. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/game
  9. National Taiwan University Ranking (n.d.). Performance ranking of scientific papers for world universities 2014: Background. http://nturanking.lis.ntu.edu.tw/BackgroundMethodology/Background-enus.aspx
  10. Oxford Dictionaries (2015). Definition of “game”. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/game
  11. SCImago Institutions Rankings (n.d.). SIR methodology. http://www.scimagoir.com/methodology.php
  12. Wikipedia (2015). College and university rankings: Regional and national rankings. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_and_university_rankings#Regional_and_national_rankings

Copyright information

© UNESCO IBE 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Yudkevich
    • 1
  • Philip G. Altbach
    • 2
  • Laura E. Rumbley
    • 2
  1. 1.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation
  2. 2.Center for International Higher Education, Campion HallBoston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations