Schools and learning in rural India and Pakistan: Who goes where, and how much are they learning?
- 738 Downloads
It is increasingly recognized that there is a global learning crisis. This article investigates this learning crisis through a comparative analysis of rural India and Pakistan. Using data from each country’s Annual Status of Education Report, it demonstrates that socioeconomic status and gender are important determinants of whether children are in school, the type of school they attend, and whether they are learning. While learning varies across schools, socioeconomic disparities predominate: disadvantaged children in private schools are learning less than more advantaged children in government schools. Gender also plays an important role, with disparities between boys and girls most pronounced among poorer children in Pakistan. In addition, while private tuition improves learning for all children, it does not resolve socioeconomic and gender disparities. The study indicates that policymakers need to focus on government schools since that is where most of the poorest children study and where learning levels are lowest. The fact that more advantaged children are learning in government schools indicates the role that such schools can play in education.
KeywordsRural education Private schools Learning Inequality India Pakistan
- Ahmed, H., Amjad, S., Bukhari, A., Shah, S. A., Sikander, U., Tirmazee, Z., et al. (2013). Determinants of school choice: Evidence from rural Punjab. Center for Research in Economics and Business, Lahore School of Economics. http://www.periglobal.org/sites/periglobal.org/files/ESP-WP-No55-FINAL.pdf.
- Andrabi, T., Bau, N., Das, J., & Khwaja, A. I. (2010). Are bad public schools public “bads”? Test scores and civic values in public and private schools. http://economics-files.pomona.edu/Andrabi/Research/jishnu4_5a.pdf.
- Andrabi, T., Das, J., Khwaja, A. I., & Zajonc, T. (2011). Do value-added estimates add value? Accounting for learning dynamics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3), 29–54.Google Scholar
- Arif, G. M., & Saqib, N. (2003). Production of cognitive life skills in public, private, and NGO schools in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 42(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
- ASER [Annual Status of Education Report] Centre (2014). 1996–2005: Foundations. http://www.asercentre.org/p/158.html.
- ASER India (2014). Annual status of education report (rural) 2013. New Delhi: ASER Centre.Google Scholar
- ASER Pakistan (2013). Annual status of education report: ASER Pakistan 2013. Lahore: SAFED.Google Scholar
- ASER Pakistan (2014). Standards manual. http://aserpakistan.org/document/aser/ASER%20STANDARD%20MANUAL.pdf.
- Aslam, M., & Atherton, P. (2012). The “shadow” education sector in India and Pakistan: The determinants, benefits and equity effects of private tutoring. Education Support Programme Working Paper Series, 38. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
- Aslam, M., & Mansoor, S. (2011). The private tuition industry in Pakistan: An alarming trend. In Policy brief: Annual status of education report. http://www.aserpakistan.org/document/aser_policy_briefs/2011/Tution%20Brief.pdf.
- Banerji, R. (2013). Learning for all: The challenge of taking everyone along. In K. Kenny, P. Lei, W. Paxton, M. Talbot-Zorn, & A. Henck (Eds.), The right to learn: Community participation in improving learning (pp. 28–31). Westport, CT: Save the Children.Google Scholar
- Bhattacharjea, S., Whadwa, W., & Banerki, R. (2011). Inside primary schools: A study of teaching and learning in rural India. Pratham: Mumbai Education Initiative. http://img.asercentre.org/docs/Publications/Inside_Primary_School/Report/tl_study_print_ready_version_oct_7_2011.pdf.
- Chaven, M., & Banerji, R. (2013). The bottom-up push for quality education in India. In H. J. Malone (Ed.), Leading educational change (pp. 97–101). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Chudgar, A. (2012). Variation in private school performance. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(11), 52–59.Google Scholar
- Das, J., Pandey, P., & Zajonc, T. (2006). Learning levels and gaps in Pakistan. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4067. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Day Ashley, L., Mcloughlin, C., Aslam, M., Engel, J., Wales, J., Rawal, S., … Rose, P. (2014). The role and impact of private schools in developing countries. London: Department for International Development.Google Scholar
- Desai, S., Dubey, A., Vanneman, R., & Banerji, R. (2009). Private schooling in India: A new educational landscape. India Policy Forum, 5, 1–58.Google Scholar
- Dongre, A., & Tewary, V. (2014). Impact of private tutoring on learning levels: Evidence from India. New Delhi: Accountability Initiative. http://ideasforindia.in/article.aspx?article_id=319#sthash.TffWe6Zs.dpuf/.
- French, R., & Kingdon, G. (2010). The relative effectiveness of private and government schools in rural India: Evidence from ASER data. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
- Goyal, S., & Pandey, P. (2009). How do government and private schools differ? Findings from two large Indian states. South Asia Human Development Report 30. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Härmä, J., & Rose, P. (2012). Is low-fee private primary schooling affordable for the poor? Evidence from rural India. In S. L. Robertson, K. Mundy, A. Verger, & F. Menashy (Eds.), Public private partnerships in education: New actors and modes of governance in a globalizing world (pp. 243–258). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Jamil, B. R. (2014). ASER and right to education: Tracking provisions for fundamental rights and social justice. In Annual status of education report: ASER Pakistan 2013. Lahore: SAFED.Google Scholar
- Kingdon, G. (2008). Private and public schooling: The Indian experience. In R. Chakrabarti & P. Petersen (Eds.), School choice international: Exploiting public–private partnerships (pp. 111–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Miller, B. D. (1997). The endangered sex: Neglect of female children in rural North India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Muralidharan, K., & Kremer, M. (2008). Public and private schools in rural India. In R. Chakrabarti & P. Petersen (Eds.), School choice international: Exploiting public–private partnerships. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Muralidharan, K., & Sundararaman, V. (2013). Contract teachers: Experimental evidence from India. NBER Working Paper 19440. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Saeed, S., & Zia, H. (2014). Measuring gender and educational inequality: Addressing the marginalized. In Annual status of education report: ASER Pakistan 2013. Lahore: SAFED.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (2009). Introduction: Primary schooling in West Bengal. In K. Rana, S. Sen, M. Sarkar, P. Haldar, & A. Nandy (Eds.), The Pratichi education report II: Primary education in West Bengal—Changes and challenges. New Delhi: Pratichi Trust.Google Scholar
- Singh, A. (2013). Size and sources of the private school premium in test scores in India. Young Lives Working Paper No. 98. Oxford: Young Lives.Google Scholar
- Srivastava, P. (2006). Private schooling and mental models about girls’ schooling in India. Compare, 36(4), 497–514.Google Scholar
- Sucharita, V. (2014). Negotiating between family, peers and school: Understanding the world of government school and private school students. Compare, 44(3), 379–393.Google Scholar
- Tooley, J., & Dixon, P. (2006). “De facto” privatisation of education and the poor: Implications of a study from sub-Saharan Africa and India. Compare, 36(4), 443–462.Google Scholar
- UNESCO (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all. Education for All Global Monitoring Report. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Wadhwa, W. (2013). Private inputs into schooling: Bang for the buck? New Delhi: ASER. http://img.asercentre.org/docs/Publications/ASER%20Reports/ASER_2013/ASER2013_report%20sections/willimawadhwaarticle.pdf.
- Wales, J., Wild, L., Day Ashley, L., Mcloughlin, C., Aslam, M., Hines, S., … Rose, P. (2014). The role and impact of non-state philanthropic and religious schools in developing countries: A rigorous review of the evidence. London: Department for International Development.Google Scholar