, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 393–415 | Cite as

Multiple providers and access to primary education: The case of Bangladesh

  • Zia-Us-Sabur
  • Manzoor AhmedEmail author
Open File


Even though most children in Bangladesh are enrolled in school, the country faces enormous challenges in ensuring that children complete primary education, and learn an acceptable amount. Multiple providers—state, quasi-state, and non-state—have helped to raise the initial enrolment rate and improve the gender balance. The critical question is how the multiplicity and diversity of provision can contribute to achieving truly universal primary education with high completion rates and acceptable levels of learning. A range of sub-questions relate to this critical question, including what is meant by multiple provision and how a diversity of provisions can be shaped into a system that serves the goal of effective and equitable access. This article addresses the above questions in the context of the history and educational development in Bangladesh. They are particularly significant at present, as the government is about to implement a new national education policy and design a five-year national development plan (2011–2015), which would have a decisive impact on progress towards achieving the EFA goal of universal primary education by 2015.


Multiple providers Access and participation Education quality and equity 


  1. AED [Academy for Educational Development] (2003). Partnerships in education: Key findings on the role of NGOs in basic education in Africa. Washington, DC: AED.Google Scholar
  2. AED [Academy for Educational Development] (2006). Case study: Meeting EFA: BRAC primary schools. Washington, DC: AED.
  3. Aga Khan Foundation (2007). Non-state providers and public-private-community partnerships in education. Background paper prepared for the education for all global monitoring report 2008. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  4. Ahmed, M., Ahmed, K. S., Khan, N. I., & Ahmed, R. (2007). Access to education in Bangladesh: Country analytic review of primary and secondary education. CREATE. Brighton: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  5. Ahmed, M., Ali, K. S., & Khan, K. (2005). Education sector mapping. Report prepared for the canadian international development agency. Dhaka: Institute of educational development, Brac University.Google Scholar
  6. Boeren, A., Kassam, Y., Tasker, G., & Wirak, A. (2009). Review of BRAC education programmeI (20042009) and appraisal of BRAC education programmeII (20092014). Final report. Dhaka: BRAC.Google Scholar
  7. CAMPE [Campaign for Popular Education] (2008). Achieving universal primary education in Bangladesh. Position paper, submitted to the Ministry of primary and mass education. Dhaka: CAMPE.Google Scholar
  8. CAMPE [Campaign for Popular Education] (2009). State of primary education in Bangladesh: Progress made, challenges remained. Education Watch 2008 report. Dhaka: CAMPE.Google Scholar
  9. DeStefano, J., Schuh Moore, A., Balwanz, D., & Hartwell, A. (2006). Meeting EFA: Reaching the underserved through complementary models of effective schooling. Equip2 working paper. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development.Google Scholar
  10. Government of Bangladesh (2003). Macro-plan: Second primary education development programme. Dhaka: Ministry of Primary and Mass Education.Google Scholar
  11. Government of Bangladesh (2009). National education policy 2009. Final draft [in Bangla]. Dhaka: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  12. Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Education (1974). Qudrat-e-khuda Education Commission report [in Bangla]. Dhaka: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  13. Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Education (2000). The national education policy (based on the report of the National Education Policy Formulation Committee 1997) [in Bangla]. Dhaka: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  14. Lewin, K. (2007). The limits to growth of non-government private schooling in Sub-Saharan Africa. CREATE Pathways to access Series. Research monograph no. 5. Brighton: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  15. Mehrotra, S. (2006). The economics of elementary education in India. New Delhi: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Rose, P. (2002). Is the non-state education sector serving the needs of the poor? Evidence from east and southern Africa. Paper prepared for DFID [Department for International Development] seminar for the 2004 world development report. New York: United Nations Development.Google Scholar
  17. Rose, P. (2007). NGO provision of basic education: Alternative or complementary service delivery to support access to the excluded. CREATE pathways to access Series. Research monograph no 3. Brighton: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  18. Sadgopal, A. (2008). Common school system and the future of India.
  19. Teachers’ memorandum in protest of handing over of management and supervision of primary education to BRAC (2008, 28 May). News story [in Bangla], Daily Naya Diganta. Google Scholar
  20. UNESCO (2007a). Education for All by 2015: Will we make it? Education for All Global monitoring report 2008. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  21. UNESCO (2007b). Education sector-wide approaches: Background, guide, and lessons. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  22. Williams, J., & Ahmed, M. (August 2007). Building capacities and partnerships to achieve EFA 2015 goals. Note to ELCG [Education Local Consultative Group]. Dhaka: ELCG.Google Scholar

Copyright information


Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Educational DevelopmentBrac UniversityUttara, DhakaBangladesh
  2. 2.Institute of Educational DevelopmentBrac UniversityDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations