PROSPECTS

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 15–34 | Cite as

Making Education for All inclusive: where next?

Open File

Abstract

This paper argues that a common sense of purpose around inclusive education, together with a consistent use of language, is essential if Education for All (EFA) strategies are to become more inclusive. This does not require the introduction of new techniques; rather it involves: collaboration within and between schools, closer links between schools and communities, networking across contexts, and the collection and use of contextually relevant evidence. The authors draw on research evidence relating to teaching and learning, school development, leadership and the development of education systems. This research is mostly from economically developed contexts, but it is also drawn from the experience of a UNESCO teacher education project which was conducted in over 80 countries and case study material gathered by the Enabling Education Network (EENET), which supports practitioners in documenting their experience of working towards more inclusive education, primarily in the countries of the South.

Keywords

EFA Inclusive education Schools Diversity Leadership Exclusion 

References

  1. Ahuja, A. (2005). EFA National Action Plans review study: Key findings. Bangkok: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  2. Ainscow, M. (1997). Towards inclusive schooling. British Journal of Special Education, 24(1), 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainscow, M. (1998). Developing links between special needs and school improvement. Support for Learning, 13(2), 70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ainscow, M. (1999). Understanding the development of inclusive schools. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  5. Ainscow, M. (2003). Using teacher development to foster inclusive classroom practices. In T. Booth, K. Nes, & M. Stromstad (Eds.), Developing inclusive teacher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Ainscow, M. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change? Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2004). Understanding and developing inclusive practices in schools: A collaborative action research network. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(2), 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ainscow, M., Farrell, P., & Tweddle, D. (2000). Developing policies for inclusive education: A study of the role of local education authorities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 4(3), 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ainscow, M., & Howes, A. (2007). Working together to improve urban secondary schools: A study of practice in one city. School Leadership and Management, 27(3), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ainscow, M., & Kaplan, I. (2006). Using evidence to encourage inclusive school development: Possibilities and challenges. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 29(2), 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ainscow, M., Muijs, D., & West, M. (2006a). Collaboration as a strategy for improving schools in challenging circumstances. Improving Schools, 9(3), 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ainscow, M., & West, M. (Eds.). (2006). Improving urban schools: Leadership and collaboration. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ainscow, M., et al. (2003). Making sense of the development of inclusive practices. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18(2), 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ainscow, M., et al. (2006b). Improving schools, developing inclusion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Bartolome, L. I. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Towards a humanising pedagogy. Harvard Education Review, 54(2), 173–194.Google Scholar
  16. Booth, T. (1996). A perspective on inclusion from England. Cambridge Review of Education, 26(1), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (Eds.). (1998). From them to us: An international study of inclusion in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). The index for inclusion (2nd ed.). Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.Google Scholar
  19. Brantlinger, E. (1997). Using ideology: Cases of non-recognition of the politics of research and practice in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67(4), 425–459.Google Scholar
  20. Carrington, S. (1999). Inclusion needs a different school culture. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3(3), 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chapman, C. (2005). External intervention and school improvement. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  22. Chapman, C., & Allen, T. (2006). Partnerships for improvement: The specialist schools achievement programme. London: SST.Google Scholar
  23. Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Corbett, J. (2001). Supporting inclusive education: A connective pedagogy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Corbett, J., & Slee, R. (2000). An international conversation on inclusive education. In F. Armstrong, D. Armstrong, & L. Barton (Eds.), Inclusive education: Policy, contexts and comparative perspectives. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
  26. Davis, P., et al. (2004). Teaching strategies and approaches for pupils with special educational needs: A scoping study. London: DfES (Research Report 516).Google Scholar
  27. Dyson, A. (2006). Beyond the school gates: Context, disadvantage and ‘urban schools’. In M. Ainscow & M. West (Eds.), Improving urban schools: Leadership and collaboration. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Dyson, A., Howes, A., & Roberts, B. (2002). A systematic review of the effectiveness of school-level actions for promoting participation by all students. London: Inclusive Education Review Group for the EPPI Centre, Institute of Education. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/EPPIWeb/home.aspx?page =/reel/review_groups/inclusion/review_one.htm. Accessed 30 Jan 2008.
  29. Dyson, A., & Millward, A. (2000). Schools and special needs: Issues of innovation and inclusion. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  30. Elmore, P. L., Peterson, P. L., & McCarthy, S. J. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning and school organisation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Freire, S., & César, M. (2002). Evolution of the Portuguese education system: A deaf child’s life in a regular school—is it possible to have hope? Educational and Child Psychology, 19(2), 76–96.Google Scholar
  32. Freire, S., & César, M. (2003). Inclusive ideals/inclusive practices: How far is dream from reality? Five comparative case studies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18(3), 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalisation of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60(4), 294–309.Google Scholar
  34. Fulcher, G. (1989). Disabling policies? A comparative approach to education policy and disability. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  35. Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  36. Hargreaves, D. H. (1995). School culture, school effectiveness and school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(1), 115–123.Google Scholar
  37. Hargreaves, D. H. (2003). Education epidemic: Transforming secondary schools through innovation networks. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  38. Harris, A., & Chrispeels, J. H. (Eds.). (2006). Improving schools and education systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Hart, S. (2003). Learning without limits. In M. Nind, K. Sheehy, & K. Simmons (Eds.), Inclusive education: Learners and learning contexts. London: Fulton.Google Scholar
  40. Hart, S., et al. (2004). Learning without limits. Maidenhead: Open University.Google Scholar
  41. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Howes, A., & Ainscow, M. (2006). Collaboration with a city-wide purpose: Making paths for sustainable educational improvement. In M. Ainscow & M. West (Eds.), Improving urban school: Leadership and collaboration. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Huberman, M. (1993). The model of the independent artisan in teachers’ professional relationships. In J. W. Little & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues and contexts. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hulme, D. (2007). The making of the Millennium Development Goals: Human development meets results-based management in an imperfect world. Manchester: Brooks World Poverty Institute (Working Psaper 16).Google Scholar
  45. Kristensen, K., et al. (2006). Opportunities for inclusion? The education of learners with special educational needs and disabilities in special schools in Uganda. British Journal of Special Education, 33(3), 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kugelmass, J. (2001). Collaboration and compromise in creating and sustaining an inclusive school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 5(1), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lambert, L., et al. (1995). The constructivist leader. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  48. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lewin, K. M. (2007). Diversity in convergence: Access to education for all. Compare, 37(5), 577–600 (Presidential Address, BAICE, September 2006).Google Scholar
  50. Lewis, A., & Norwich, B. (Eds.). (2005). Special teaching for special children: A pedagogy for inclusion? Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lewis, I. (2003). Seven years of conversations: An analysis of EENET’s correspondence records, 1997–2004. Manchester: EENET. Retrieved 19 Feb 2008 from http://eenet.org.uk/about/seven_years.pdf.
  52. Lipman, P. (1997). Restructuring in context: A case study of teacher participation and the dynamics of ideology, race and power. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 3–37.Google Scholar
  53. Lo, M. L., Yan, P. W., & Pakey, C. P. M. (Eds.). (2005). For each and everyone: Catering for individual differences through learning studies. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Messiou, K. (2006). Understanding marginalisation in education: The voice of children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(3), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miles, S. (2002). Learning about inclusive education: The role of EENET in promoting international dialogue. In P. Farrell & M. Ainscow (Eds.), Making special education inclusive. London: Fulton.Google Scholar
  56. Miles, S., & Ahuja, A. (2007). Learning from difference: Sharing international experiences of developments in inclusive education. In L. Florian (Ed.), The Sage handbook of special education (pp. 131–145). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Miles, S., & Kaplan, I. (2005). Using images to promote reflection: An action research study in Zambia and Tanzania. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 5(2), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miles, S., & Singal, N. The education for all and inclusive education debate: Conflict, contradiction or opportunity? International Journal of Inclusive Education (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  59. Mittler, P. (2000). Working towards inclusive education: Social contexts. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
  60. Mittler, P. (2005). The global context of inclusive education: The role of the United Nations. In D. Mitchell (Ed.), Contextualising inclusive education (pp. 22–36). London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  61. Riehl, C. J. (2000). The principal’s role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: A review of normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational administration. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 55–81.Google Scholar
  62. Robinson, V. M. J. (1998). Methodology and the research-practice gap. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 17–26.Google Scholar
  63. Rustemier, S., & Booth, T. (2005). Learning about the index in use: A study of the use of the index for inclusion in schools and LEAs in England. Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.Google Scholar
  64. Schein, E. (1985). Organisational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  65. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  66. Skrtic, T. (1991). Behind special education: A critical analysis of professional culture and school organization. Denver: Love.Google Scholar
  67. Slee, R. (1996). Inclusive schooling in Australia? Not yet. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Spurgeon, W. (2007). Diversity and choice for children with complex needs. In R. Cigman (Ed.), Included or excluded? The challenge of the mainstream for some SEN children. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  70. Stoker, G. (2003). Public value management: A new resolution of the democracy/efficency trade off. http://ipeg.org.uk/publications.htm.
  71. Stubbs, S. (1995). The Lesotho National Integrated Education Programme: A case study on implementation. Cambridge: Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge. Unpublished M.Ed. Thesis. Retrieved on 24 Nov 2005 from http://eenet.org.uk/action/sthesis/contents.shtml.
  72. Stubbs, S., & Ainscow, M. (1996). EENET proposal to establish an information sharing network aimed at supporting and promoting the inclusion of marginalised groups in education, 6 September 1996. Manchester: School of Education, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  73. Thomas, G., & Loxley, A. (2001). Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Trent, S. C., Artiles, A. J., & Englert, C. S. (1998). From deficit thinking to social constructivism: A review of theory, research and practice in special education. Review of Research in Education, 23, 277–307.Google Scholar
  75. United Nations. (2005). Violence against disabled children. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  76. United Nations. (2006). UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  77. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1990). World declaration on education for all. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  78. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1994). Final report: World conference on special needs education: Access and quality. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  79. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2001). The open file on inclusive education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  80. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2007). EFA global monitoring report: EFA strong foundations: Early childhood care and education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  81. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2008). The EFA global monitoring report. Education for all by 2015. Will we make it? Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  82. Vitello, S. J., & Mithaug, D. E. (Eds.). (1998). Inclusive schooling: National and international perspectives. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  83. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. West, M., Ainscow, M., & Notman, H. (2003). What leaders read: Key texts from education and beyond. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  85. World Vision UK. (2007). Education’s missing millions. Including disabled children in education through EFA FTI processes and national sector plans. Milton Keynes: World Vision UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© UNESCO IBE 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESI, School of EducationManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations