Advertisement

Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 46, Issue 2–3, pp 185–197 | Cite as

Bounded learning-by-doing and sources of firm level productivity growth in colombian food manufacturing industry

  • Apurba SheeEmail author
  • Spiro E. Stefanou
Article

Abstract

This paper models the bounded learning concept with the learning progress function characterized by the degree of efficiency and the specification of the learning progress as a logistic function capturing both the slow start-up and the limit in learning progress. We differentiate learning efficiency from the technical efficiency. The endogeneity corrected stochastic frontier model is then used to decompose the factor productivity growth into components associated with technological change, technical efficiency, scale, and learning. This productivity growth decomposition provides useful information and policy level insight in firm-level productivity analysis. Empirical results based on plant-level panel data on the Colombian food manufacturing industry for the period 1982–1998 suggest that productivity growth not only stems from technical progress, technical efficiency change, and scale but also from significant learning effect. The relative importance of the productivity growth components provides perspective for efficient resource allocation within the firm.

Keywords

Colombian food manufacturing industry Bounded learning-by-doing Endogeneity corrected stochastic frontier Firm-level productivity growth Decomposition of productivity growth 

JEL Classification

D24 O47 C23 

Notes

Acknowledegments

The authors thank the associate editor, two anonymous referees, and Cindy Cox for helpful comments. We also thank Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadistica (DANE) for providing access to the data.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Ackerberg D, Caves K, Frazer G (2006) Structural identification of production functions. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 38349, posted 25 April 2012. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/38349/
  2. Ackerberg D, Lanier Benkard C, Berry S, Pakes A (2007) Econometric tools for analyzing market outcomes. Handb Econom Elsevier 6:4171–4276Google Scholar
  3. Adler P, Clark K (1991) Behind the learning curve: a sketch of the learning process. Manag Sci 37(3):267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argote L (1999) Organizational learning: creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Manag Sci 36(2):140–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arrow K (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29(3):155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bahk B, Gort M (1993) Decomposing learning by doing in new plants. J Polit Econ 101(4):561–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baloff N (1966) The learning curve—some controversial issues. J Ind Econ 14(3):275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baloff N (1971) Extension of the learning curve—some empirical results. Oper Res Q 22(4):329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Battese G, Coelli T (1992) Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India. J Prod Anal 3(1):153–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bauer P (1990) Decomposing TFP growth in the presence of cost inefficiency, nonconstant returns to scale, and technological progress. J Prod Anal 1(4):287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benkard C (2000) Learning and forgetting: the dynamics of aircraft production. Am Econ Rev 90(4):1034–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brachet T, David G (2011) On the determinants of organizational forgetting. Am Econ J Microecon 3(3):100–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carr G (1946) Peacetime cost estimating requires new learning curves. Aviation 45(4):220–228Google Scholar
  15. Cochran E (1960) New concepts of the learning curve. J Ind Eng 11(4):317–327Google Scholar
  16. Cochran E, Sherman H (1982) Predicting new product labour hours. Int J Prod Res 20(4):517–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conway R, Schultz A (1959) The manufacturing progress function. J Ind Eng 10(1):39–53Google Scholar
  18. Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: productivity in franchises. Manag Sci 41(11):1750–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denny M, Fuss M, Waverman L (1981) The measurement and interpretation of total factor productivity in regulated industries, with an application to Canadian telecommunications. In: T. G. Cowing & R. E. Stevenson (eds) Productivity measurement in regulated industries, Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Epple D, Argote L, Murphy K (1996) An empirical investigation of the microstructure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper Res 44(1):77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griliches Z, Mairesse J (1995). Production functions: the search for identification. NBER working paper 5067Google Scholar
  22. Irwin D, Klenow P (1994) Learning-by-doing spillovers in the semiconductor industry. J Polit Econ 102(6):1200–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jarmin R (1994) Learning by doing and competition in the early rayon industry. Rand J Econ 25(3):441–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jovanovic B, Nyarko Y (1995) A Bayesian learning model fitted to a variety of empirical learning curves. Brook Pap Econ Act Microecon 1:247–305Google Scholar
  25. Kim S, Han G (2001) A decomposition of total factor productivity growth in Korean manufacturing industries: a stochastic frontier approach. J Prod Anal 16(3):269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumbhakar SC (2000) Estimation and decomposition of productivity change when production is not efficient: a panel data approach. Econ Rev 19(4):425–460Google Scholar
  27. Kumbhakar SC, and Lovell CAK (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  28. Leibenstein H (1966) Allocative efficiency vs.” X-efficiency”. Am Econ Rev 56(3):392–415Google Scholar
  29. Leibenstein H (1978) X-inefficiency Xists: Reply to an Xorcist. Am Econ Rev 68(1):203–211Google Scholar
  30. Leibenstein H (1979) A branch of economics is missing: micro-micro theory. J Econ Lit 17(2):477–502Google Scholar
  31. Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70(2):317–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lieberman M (1984) The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. Rand J Econ 15(2):213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lucas Jr R (1993) Making a miracle. Econometrica 61(2):251–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luh Y, Stefanou S (1993) Learning-by-doing and the sources of productivity growth: a dynamic model with application to US agriculture. J Prod Anal 4(4):353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Malerba F (1992) Learning by firms and incremental technical change. Econ J 102(413):845–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marschak J, Andrews W (1944) Random simultaneous equations and the theory of production. Econometrica 12(3):143–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mundlak Y (1996) Production function estimation: reviving the primal. Econometrica 64(2):431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nishimizu M, Page JM (1982) Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia, 1965–1978. Econ J 92(368):920–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oi WY (1967) The neoclassical foundations of progress function. Econ J 77(307):579–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Olley G, Pakes A (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6):1263–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rapping L (1965) Learning and World War II production functions. Rev Econ Stat 47(1):81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosen S (1972) Learning by experience as joint production. Q J Econ 86(3):366–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shee A, Stefanou SE (2015) Endogeneity corrected stochastic production frontier and technical efficiency. Am J Agric Econ 97(3):939–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stefanou SE, Saxena S (1988) Education, experience, and allocative efficiency: a dual approach. Am J Agric Econ 70(2):338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stigler G (1976) The xistence of X-efficiency. Am Econ Rev 66(1):213–216Google Scholar
  46. Thompson P (2001) How much did the liberty shipbuilders learn? New evidence for an old case study. J Polit Econ 109(1):103–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thompson P (2007) How much did the Liberty shipbuilders forget? Manag Sci 53(6):908–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thornton R, Thompson P (2001) Learning from experience and learning from others: an exploration of learning and spillovers in wartime shipbuilding. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1350–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Young A (1993) Invention and bounded learning by doing. J Polit Econ 101(3):443–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research InstituteArushaTanzania
  2. 2.Food and Resource Economics DepartmentUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Business Economics GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations