Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Migration, local off-farm employment, and agricultural production efficiency: evidence from China

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of local off-farm employment and migration on the technical efficiency of rural households’ crop production using a five-year panel dataset from more than 2000 households in five Chinese provinces. While there is not much debate about the positive contribution of migration and local off-farm employment to China’s economy, there is increasing concern about the potential negative effects of moving labor away from agriculture on China’s future food security. This is a critical issue as maintaining self-sufficiency in grain production will be critical for China to feed its huge population in the future. Several papers have studied the impact of migration on production and have yielded ambiguous results. But the impact of migration on technical efficiency is rarely studied. Methodologically, we incorporate the correlated random-effects approach into the inefficiency analysis of the standard stochastic production frontier model to control for unobservable factors that are correlated with migration and off-farm employment decisions and technical efficiency. The most consistent result that emerged from our econometric analysis is that neither migration nor local off-farm employment has a negative effect on the technical efficiency of grain production, which does not support the widespread notion that vast-scale labor migration could negatively affect China’s future food security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. NBSC: National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China.

  2. High yields do not necessarily imply high efficiency, as “high-input” farmers can generate high yields but not efficiently utilize their inputs (Mochebelele and Winter-Nelson 2000).

  3. Local off-farm employment refers to any local wage-earning or self-employment activities inside own county. Migration is defined as any economic activities outside of own county.

  4. The assumption of the truncated normal distribution of technical inefficiency term \(u_{it}\) has been the dominant assumption in the SFP literature. However, there are attempts to generalize the model to alternative distributions of \(u_{it}\), such as the exponential and gamma distribution (van den Broeck et al. 1994, Tsionas 2002, Huang 2004). To allow different distributions of \(u_{it}\), the Bayesian method is generally needed. In that strand of the literature, simultaneous analysis of inefficiency has not been investigated. In this paper, we use classical MLE to estimate the model and restrict \(u_{it}\) to have a truncated normal distribution. A few existing studies comparing the effects of different distribution assumptions on efficiencies have also shown that the distribution assumption is largely immaterial (Greene 1990; Kumbhakar and Lovell 2000).

  5. The only difference between column 1 and column 2 is that the land size dummy and the interaction terms between land size dummy and the non-farm employment variables (i.e., migration and local off-farm employment) are included in the latter but not the former.

  6. We thank an anonymous associate editor for this constructive suggestion.

References

  • Aigner D, Lovell C, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econom 6(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett C, Carter M, Timmer C (2010) A century-long perspective on agricultural development. Am J Agric Econ 92(2):447–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin D, Brandt L, Giles J (2005) The evolution of income inequality in rural China. Econ Dev Cult Change 53(4):769–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai F, Du Y,Wang M (2009) Migration and labor mobility in China Human development research paper 2009/9. Washington, DC: United Nations Development Programme

  • Chamberlain G (1980) Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Rev Econ Stud 47:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang HH, Wen FI (2011) Off-farm work, technical efficiency, and rice production risk in Taiwan. Agric Econ 42(2):269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang H, Dong X, Macphail F (2011) Labor migration and time use patterns of the left-behind children and elderly in rural China. World Dev 39(12):2199–2210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavas J, Petrie R, Roth M (2005) Farm household production efficiency: evidence from the Gambia. Am J Agr Econ 87:160–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Huang Q, Rozelle S, Shi Y, Zhang L (2009a) Effect of migration on children’s educational performance in rural China. Comparative Economic Studies 51(3):323–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Huffman WE, Rozelle S (2009b) Farm technology and technical efficiency: evidence from four regions in China. China Econ Rev 20(2):153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Brauw A, Mu R (2012) Unattended but not undernourished: young children left behind in rural China. IFPRI discussion paper 1191. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute

  • de Brauw A, Rozelle S (2008) Migration and Household Investment in Rural China. China Econ Rev 19:320–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Brauw A, Huang J, Zhang L, Rozelle S (2013) The feminisation of agriculture with Chinese characteristics. J Dev Stud 49(5):689–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Y, Park A, Wang S (2005) Migration and rural poverty in China. J Comp Econ 33(4):688–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Cornejo J (1996) The macroeconomic impact of 1PM adoption: theory and application. Agric Resour Econ Rev 25:149–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles J (2006) Is life more risky in the open? household risk-coping and the opening of China’s labor markets. J Dev Econ 81(1):25–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles J, Wang D, Zhao C (2010) Can China’s rural elderly count on support from adult children? Implications of rural-to-urban migration. J Popul Ageing 3(3):183–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (1990) A gamma-distributed stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics 46(1/2):141–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2008) The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. Measurement Prod Eff Prod Growth 92–250

  • Greenwood MJ (1971) An analysis of the determinants of internal labor mobility in India. Ann Reg Sci 5(1):137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang HC (2004) Estimation of technical inefficiencies with heterogeneous technologies. J Prod Anal 21(3):277–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin S, Ma H, Huang J, Hu R, Rozelle S (2010) Productivity, efficiency and technical change: measuring the performance of China’s transforming agriculture. J Prod Anal 33(3):191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalirajan K (1981) An econometric analysis of yield variability in paddy production. Can J Agric Econ 29(3):283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight J, Deng Q, Li S (2011) The puzzle of migrant labour shortage and rural labour surplus in China. China Econ Rev 22(4):585–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar S, Lovell CA (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC, Summa T (1989) Technical efficiency of finnish brewing plants: a production frontier approach. Scand J Econ 91(1):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis WA (1954) Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. Manch Sch 22:139–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Wang C, Segarra E, Nan Z (2013) Migration, remittances, and agricultural productivity in small farming system in northwest China. China Agric Econ Rev 5(1):5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Zhuang J (2000) Determinants of technical efficiency in post-collective Chinese agriculture: evidence from Farm-level data. J Comp Econ 28(3):545–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1997) Internal migration in developing countries. Handb Popul Family Econ 1:721–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen W, van den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 18(2):435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mochebelele MT, Winter-Nelson A (2000) Migrant labor and farm technical efficiency in lesotho. World Dev 28(1):143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohapatra S, Rozelle S, Goodhue R (2007) The rise of self-employment in rural China: development or distress? World Dev 35(1):163–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu R, van de Walle D (2011) Left behind to farm? Women’s labor re-allocation in rural China. Labour Econ 18:S83–S97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak Y (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica 46(1):69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy R (2000) Return migrant entrepreneurs and economic diversification in two counties in south Jiangxi, China. J Int Dev 11(4):661–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (2011) The release of the sixth national census data of China. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201104/t20110428_12707.html

  • Nonthakot P, Villano RA (2008) Migration and farm efficiency: evidence from northern Thailand. Paper presented at the 52nd Australian agricultural and resource economics society conference, Canberra, Australia, 5–8 February 2008

  • Pitt M, Lee LF (1981) The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. J Dev Econ 9(1):43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao E, Brümmer B, Qaim M (2012) Farmer participation in supermarket channels, production technology, and efficiency: the case of vegetables in Kenya. Am J Agric Econ 94(4):891–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirkeci I, Cohen JH, Ratha D (2012) Migration and remittances during the global financial crisis and beyond. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JE, Rozelle S, de Brauw A (2003) Migration and incomes in source communities: a new economics of migration perspective from China. Econ Dev Cult Change 52(1):75–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian W, Wan G (2000) Technical efficiency and its determinants of China’s grain production. J Prod Anal 13:159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsionas EG (2002) Stochastic frontier models with random coefficients. J Appl Econ 17(2):127–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (2003) Overall report: China’s accession to WTO: challenges for women in the agricultural and industrial sector. Beijing: UNDP, UNIFEM, All China Women’s Federation, National Development and Reform Commission and Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy

  • Van den Broeck J, Koop G, Osiewalski J et al (1994) Stochastic frontier models: a bayesian perspective. J Econom 61(2):273–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Schmidt P (2002) One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. J Prod Anal 18(2):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wang C, Pan S (2011) The impact of nonfarm activities on agricultural productivity in rural China. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association’s 2011 AAEA and NAREA joint annual meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 24–26 July 2011

  • Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouterse F (2010) Migration and technical efficiency in cereal production: evidence from Burkina Faso. Agric Econ 41(5):385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Zhang X, Reardon T (2013) The rapid rise of cross-regional agricultural mechanization services in China. Am J Agric Econ 95:1245–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue B, Sonoda T (2012) The effect of off-farm work on farm technical efficiency in China. Working paper, Nagoya University. Furi-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan

  • Zhang L, Huang J, Rozelle S (2002) Employment, emerging labor markets, and the role of education in rural China. China Econ Rev 13(2–3):313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhang L, Rozelle S, Boucher S (2006) Self-employment with chinese characteristics: the forgotten engine of rural China’s Growth. Contemp Econ Policy 24(3):446–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y (2002) Causes and consequences of return migration: recent evidence from China. J Comp Econ 30(2):376–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y (2003) The role of migrant networks in labor migration: the case of China. Contemp Econ Policy 21(4):500–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support from NSFC71361140370, the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions and Markets led by IFPRI, and the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 13CGL085). Financial supports from Michigan State University’s Competitive Discretionary Fund Program (09-CDFP-1965), the Office of the Provost and AgbioResearch are also greatly appreciated. The authors are also grateful to Peter Schmidt and Zhengfei Guan for valuable input on the paper’s econometric method. All errors remain the responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Songqing Jin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, J., Wang, H., Jin, S. et al. Migration, local off-farm employment, and agricultural production efficiency: evidence from China. J Prod Anal 45, 247–259 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-015-0464-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-015-0464-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation