Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 120–130 | Cite as

Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Predictors of VIP Attendance in Smart Beginnings Through 6 Months: Effectively Targeting At-Risk Mothers in Early Visits

  • Elizabeth B. MillerEmail author
  • Caitlin F. Canfield
  • Pamela A. Morris
  • Daniel S. Shaw
  • Carolyn Brockmeyer Cates
  • Alan L. Mendelsohn
Article
  • 137 Downloads

Abstract

Past research on predictors of participation in early childhood parenting programs suggest that families experiencing higher levels of sociodemographic adversity (e.g., younger maternal age, single parenthood, lower income or education) are less likely to participate in parenting programs. This is significant, as it may indicate that those most in need of additional support are the least likely to receive it. Data from a randomized control trial (RCT) of Smart Beginnings, an integrated, tiered model for school readiness, were used to explore predictors of attendance in Video Interaction Project (VIP) through 6 months. VIP is a primary preventive intervention delivered in tandem with pediatric well-child visits, aimed at reducing income-based disparities in early child development through promotion of responsive parent-child interactions. Using Poisson distribution models (N = 403; treatment arm, n = 201), we find that demographic, socioeconomic status (SES), and psychosocial variables are associated with program attendance but not always in the expected direction. While analyses show that first-time mothers have higher levels of program attendance as expected, we find that less-educated mothers and those with lower parenting self-efficacy have higher levels of attendance as well. The latter findings may imply that the VIP intervention is, by some indicators, effectively targeting families who are more challenging to engage and retain. Implications for pediatric-based interventions with population-level accessibility are discussed.

Keywords

Parent-child Interactions Pediatric-based Participation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HD076390-05. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Alker, J., & Chester, A. (2015). Children’s health insurance coverage rates in 2014: ACA results in significant improvements. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Health Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, C. N., Arnold, D. H., & Meagher, S. (2011). Enrollment and attendance in a parent training prevention program for conduct problems. Prevention Science, 12, 126–138.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0187-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes J., & Freude-Lagevardi, A. (2002). From pregnancy to early childhood: Early interventions to enhance the mental health of children and families. London: Mental Health Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, K. (1998). Direct measures of poverty as indicators of economic need: Evidence from the survey income and program participation. In Population Division Technical working Paper No. 30. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
  5. Berkel, C., Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., Brown, C. H., Gallo, C. G., Chiapa, A., et al. (2018). “Home practice is the program”: Parents’ practice of program skills as predictors of outcomes in the new beginnings program effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 19, 663–673.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0738-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkule, S. B., Cates, C. B., Dreyer, B. P., Huberman, H. S., Arevalo, J., Burtchen, N., et al. (2014). Reducing maternal depressive symptoms through promotion of parenting in pediatric primary care. Clinical Pediatrics, 53, 460–469.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922814528033.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Besharov, D. J., Germanis, P., Higney, C. A., & Call, D. M. (2011). Early head start—Research and evaluation project. In D. J. Besharov, P. Germans, C. A. Higney, & D. M. Call (Eds.), Assessments of twenty-six early childhood evaluations (Ch. 7). College Park: Welfare Reform Academy, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  8. Brennan, L. M., Shelleby, E. C., Shaw, D. S., Gardner, F., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. (2013). Indirect effects of the family check-up on school-age academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 762–773.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks-Gunn, J., & Markman, L. B. (2005). The contribution of parenting to ethnic and racial gaps in school readiness. The Future of Children, 15, 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canfield, C. F., Weisleder, A., Cates, C. B., Huberman, H. S., Dreyer, B. P., Legano, L. A., et al. (2015). Primary care parenting intervention effects on use of physical punishment among low-income parents of toddlers. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 36, 586–593.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassidy, J., Brett, B. E., Gross, J. T., Stern, J. A., Martin, D. A., Mohr, J. J., & Woodhouse, S. S. (2017). Circle of security—Parenting: A randomized control trial in head start. Development and Psychopathology, 29, 651–673.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417000244.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., Dreyer, B. P., Johnson, S. B., Vlahovicova, K., Ledesma, J., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016a). Leveraging healthcare to promote responsive parenting: Impacts of the video interaction project on parenting stress. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 827–835.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0267-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016b). Mitigating the effects of family poverty on early child development through parenting interventions in primary care. Academic Pediatrics, 16, S112–S120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., Johnson, S. B., Seery, A. M., Canfield, C. F., Huberman, H., et al. (2018). Enhancing parent talk, reading, and play in primary care: Sustained impacts of the video interaction project. The Journal of Pediatrics, 199, 49–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782–786.  https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crncec, R., Barnett, B., & Matthey, S. (2008). Development of an instrument to assess perceived self-efficacy in the parents and of infants. Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 442–453.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Currie, J. (2005). Health disparites and gaps in school readiness. The Future of Children, 14, 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. D’Alonzo, K. T. (2011). Evaluation and revision of questionnaires for use among low-literacy immigrant Latinos. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 19, 1255–1264.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692011000500025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2007). Intervening in children’s lives: An ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dishion, T. J., Connell, A., Weaver, C., Shaw, D., Gardner, F., & Wilson, M. (2008). The family check-up with high risk indigent families: Preventing problem behavior by increasing parents’ positive behavior support in early childhood. Child Development, 79, 1395–1414.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01195.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Duggan, A. K., McFarlane, E. C., Windham, A. M., Rohde, C. A., Salkever, D. S., Fuddy, L., ... Sia, C. C. (1999). Evaluation of Hawaii’s healthy start program. The Future of Children, 9, 66–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Earls, M. F. (2010). Incorporating recognition and management of perinatal and postpartum depression into pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 126, 1032–1039.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Escudero, V., Friedlander, M. L., Varela, N., & Abascal, A. (2008). Observing the therapeutic alliance in family therapy: Associations with participants’ perceptions and therapeutic outcomes. Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 194–214.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2008.00425.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Evans, S., Davies, S., Williams, M., & Hutchings, J. (2015). Short-term benefits from the incredible years babies programme in Powys. Community Practitioner, 88, 46–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Feinberg, M. E., Jones, D. E., Kan, M. L., & Goslin, M. C. (2010). Effects of family foundations on parents and children: 3.5 years after baseline. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 532.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020837.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Garcia, E., & Weiss, E. (2017). Education inequalities at the school starting gate: Gaps, trends, and strategies to address them. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 392–404.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.392.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gross, D., Julion, W., & Fogg, L. (2004). What motivates participation and dropout among low-income urban families of color in a prevention intervention? Family Relations, 50, 246–254.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00246.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hagan, J. F., Shaw, J. S., & Duncan, P. M. (2017). Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents. Elk Grove Village: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).Google Scholar
  30. Heinicke, C. M., Fineman, N. R., Ponce, V. A., & Guthrie, D. (2001). Relation-based intervention with at-risk mothers: Outcome in the second year of life. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 431–462.  https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heinicke, C. M., Goorsky, M., Levine, M., Ponce, V., Ruth, G., Silverman, M., & Sotelo, C. (2006). Pre-and postnatal antecedents of a home-visiting intervention and family developmental outcome. Infant Mental Health Journal, 27, 91–119.  https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.20082.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Holland, M. L., Olds, D. L., Dozier, A. M., & Kitzman, H. J. (2018). Visit attendance patterns in nurse-family partnership community sites. Prevention Science, 19, 516–527.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0829-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Howell, E. M., & Kenney, G. M. (2012). The impact of the Medicaid/CHIP expansions on children: A synthesis of the evidence. Medical Care Research and Review, 69, 372–396.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558712437245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Huebner, C. E. (2002). Evaluation of a clinic-based parent education program to reduce the risk of infant and toddler maltreatment. Public Health Nursing, 19, 377–389.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1446.2002.19507.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ingoldsby, E. M. (2010). Review of interventions to improve family engagement and retention in parent and child mental health programs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 629–645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9350-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Kolko, D. J., & Perrin, E. (2014). The integration of behavioral health interventions in children’s health care: Services, science, and suggestions. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 43, 216–228.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.862804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuo, A. A., Etzel, R. A., Chilton, L. A., Watson, C., & Gorski, P. A. (2012). Primary care pediatrics and public health: Meeting the needs of today’s children. American Journal of Public Health, 102, e17–e23.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Landry, S., Smith, K., Swank, P., Zucker, T., Crawford, A., & Solari, E. (2012). The effects of a responsive parenting intervention on parent-child interactions during shared book reading. Developmental Psychology, 48, 969–986.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Leslie, L. K., Mehus, C. J., Hawkins, J. D., Boat, T., McCabe, M. A., Barkin, S., ... Brown, R. (2016). Primary health care: Potential home for family-focused preventive interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51, S106-S118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malmberg, L.-E., Lewis, S., West, A., Murray, E., Sylva, K., & Stein, A. (2016). The influence of mothers’ and fathers’ sensitivity in the first year of life on children’s cognitive outcomes at 18 and 36 months. Child: Care, Health and Development, 42, 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mauricio, A. M., Mazza, G. L., Berkel, C., Tein, J.-Y., Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., & Winslow, E. (2018). Attendance trajectory classes among divorced and separated mothers and fathers in the new beginnings program. Prevention Science, 19, 620–629.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0783-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Mendelsohn, A. L., Dreyer, B. P., Flynn, V., Tomopoulos, S., Rovira, I., Tineo, W., … Nixon, A. F. (2005). Use of videotaped interactions during pediatric well-child care to promote child development: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 26, 34–41.Google Scholar
  43. Needlman, R., Fried, L. E., Morley, D. S., Taylor, S., & Zuckerman, B. (1991). Clinic-based intervention to promote literacy: A pilot study. American Journal of Diseases in Children, 145, 881–884.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1991.02160080059021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Brien, R. A., Moritz, P., Luckey, D. W., McClatchey, M. W., Ingoldsby, E. M., & Olds, D. L. (2012). Mixed methods analysis of participant attrition in the nurse-family partnership. Prevention Science, 13, 219–228.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0287-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Research Supporting ABC. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.abcintervention.org/researchsupport. Accessed 15 May 2018
  46. Reyno, S. M., & McGrath, P. J. (2006). Predictors of parent training efficacy for child externalizing behavior problems—A meta-analytic review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 99–111.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01544.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Supplee, L., Gardner, F., & Arnds, K. (2006). Randomized trial of a family-centered approach to the prevention of early conduct problems: 2-year effects of the family check-up in early childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.1.1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sims, B. E., & Crump, A. D. (2018). Commentary on participation in preventative interventions. Prevention Science, 19, 685–688.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0887-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, J. D., Berkel, C., Hails, K. A., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2018). Predictors of participation in the family check-up program: A randomized trial of yearly services from age 2 to 10 years. Prevention Science, 19, 652–662.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0679-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (2000). Research on family engagement in preventive interventions: Toward improved use of scientific findings in primary prevention practice. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 21, 267–284.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007039421026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Staudt, M. (2007). Treatment engagement with caregivers of at-risk children: Gaps in research and conceptualization. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 183–196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9077-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Ryzin, M. J., Fishbein, D., & Biglan, A. (2018). The promise of prevention science for addressing intergenerational poverty. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24, 128–143.  https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Weisleder, A., Cates, C. B., Dreyer, B. P., Johnson, S. B., Huberman, H. S., Seery, A. M., … Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016). Promotion of positive parenting and prevention of socioemotional disparities. Pediatrics, 137, 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whittaker, K. A., & Cowley, S. (2012). An effective programme is not enough: A review of factors associated with poor attendance and engagement with parenting support programmes. Children & Society, 26, 138–149.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2010.00333.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.New York University School of MedicineNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.Purchase CollegeState University of New YorkPurchaseUSA

Personalised recommendations