Innovation and Integrity: Desiderata and Future Directions for Prevention and Intervention Science
- 166 Downloads
This article summarizes essential implications of the papers within this special issue and discusses directions for future prevention and intervention research on conceptual issues, methodological and transfer-related challenges and opportunities. We identify a need to move from programs to principles in intervention research and encourage the implementation of research on potential mechanisms underlying intervention effectiveness. In addition, current methodological issues in intervention research are highlighted, including advancements in methodology and statistical procedures, extended outcome assessments, replication studies, and a thorough examination of potential biases. We further discuss transfer-related issues, for example the need for more research on the flexibility and adaptability of programs and intervention approaches as well as more general problems in knowledge translation reasoning the need for enhanced communication between practitioners, policy makers, and researchers. Finally, we briefly touch on the need to discuss the relation between single intervention programs, the mental health system, and changes of contextual conditions at the macro level.
KeywordsResearch integrity Child and adolescent mental health Evidence-based intervention Knowledge translation Intervention theory
The second author was funded, in part, by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent is not applicable.
- Baumann, A. A., Powell, B. J., Kohl, P. L., Tabak, R. G., Penalba, V., Protor, E. K., Domenech-Rodriguez, M. M., & Cabassa, L. J. (2015). Cultural adaptation and implementation of evidence-based parent-training: A systematic review and critique of guiding evidence. Children and Youth Services Review, 53, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.025.
- Beelmann, A. (2011). The scientific foundation of prevention. The status quo and future challenges of developmental crime prevention. In T. Bliesener, A. Beelmann, & M. Stemmler (Eds.), Antisocial behavior and crime. Contributions of developmental and evaluation research to prevention and intervention (pp. 137–164). Cambridge: Hogrefe Publishing.Google Scholar
- Beelmann, A. (2017). The effects of parent training programms in the prevention and treatment of antisocial behavior in childhood and adolescence. An international comprehensive meta-analysis. Paper presented at the What Works Global Summit - Conference, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Beelmann, A., Maichrowitz, S., Schulz, S. & Arnold, L. (2015). Wirksamkeit von Programmen zur Prävention und Kompensation von Armuts- und Migrationsfolgen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Ein Forschungsüberblick und eine Meta-Analyse internationaler Evaluationsforschung [The effectiveness of programs for buffering negative consequences of poverty and migration in children and adolescents. A review and a meta-analysis of the international evaluation research]. Final report to the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
- Belfer, M. L. (2008). Child and adolescent mental disorders: the magnitude of the problem across the globe. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49 (3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01855.x
- Biglan, A. (2016). The ultimate goal of prevention and the larger context for translation. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0635-6.
- Bromme, R., & Beelmann, A. (2016). Transfer entails communication: The public understanding of (social) science as a stage and a play for implementing evidence-based prevention knowledge and programs. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0686-8.
- Burkhardt, J. T., Schröter, D. C., Magura, S., Means, S. N., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2015). An overview of evidence-based program registers (EBPRs) for behavioral health. Evaluation and Program Planning, 48, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.09.006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Castro, F. G., Barrera Jr., M., & Holleran-Steiker, L. K. (2010). Issues and challenges in the design of culturally adapted evidence-based interventions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-033109-132032.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schnellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’social and emotional learning. A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Earp, B. D., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, article 621. https://doi.org/10.3389/psyg.2015.0062f.
- Eisner, M., & Humphreys, D. (2011). Measuring conflict of interest in prevention and intervention research. A feasibility study. In T. Bliesener, A. Beelmann, & M. Stemmler (Eds.), Antisocial behavior and crime. Contributions of developmental and evaluation research to prevention and intervention (pp. 165–180). Cambridge: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Everett, J. A. C. & Earp, B. D. (2015). A tragedy of the (academic) commons: Interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, article 1152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01152.
- Farrington, D. P., Gaffnex, H., Lösel, F., & Ttofi, M. M. (2016). Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of developmental prevention programs in reducing delinquency, aggression, and bullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ghate, D. (2016). From programs to systems: Deploying implementation science and practice for sustained real world effectiveness in services for children and families. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 45, 812–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1077449.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gorman, D. M. (2016). Can we trust positive findings of intervention research? The role of conflict of interest. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0648-1.
- Gottfredsson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E. M., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research in prevention science: Next generation. Prevention Science, 16, 893–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hallberg, K., Cook, T. D., Steiner, P. M., & Clark, M. H. (2016). Pretest measures of the study outcome and the elimination of selection bias: Evidence from three within study comparisons. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0732-6.
- Komro, K. A., Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., & Promise Neighborhoods Research Consortium. (2011). Creating nurturing environments: A science-based framework for promoting child health and development within high-poverty neighborhoods. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14, 111–134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lang, K. M., & Little, T. D. (2016). Principled missing data treatments. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0644-5.
- Malti, T., Chaparro, M. P., Zuffianò, A., & Colasante, T. (2016a). School-based interventions to promote empathy-related responding in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 45, 718–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1121822.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malti, T., Noam, G. G., Beelmann, A., & Sommer, S. (2016b). Toward dynamic adaptation of psychological interventions of child and adolescent development and mental health. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 45, 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1239539.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malti, T., Zuffianò, A., & Noam, G. G. (2017). Knowing every child: Validation of the Holistic Student Assessment (HSA) as a measure of social-emotional development. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0794-0.
- Means, S. N., Magura, S., Burkhardt, J. T., Schröter, D. C., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2015). Comparing rating paradigms for evidence-based program registers in behavioral health: Evidentiary criteria and implications for assessing programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 48, 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.09.007
- O’Connell, M. E., Boat, T., & Warner, K. E. (Eds.). (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people. Progress and possibilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Okamoto, S. K., Kulis, S., Marsiglia, F. F., Steiker, L. K. H., & Dustman, P. (2014). A continuum of approaches toward developing culturally focused prevention interventions: From adaption to grounding. Journal of Primary Prevention, 35, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-013-0333-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., & Evers, K. E. (2015). The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice (5th ed., pp. 125–148). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.). (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustment. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Spiel, C., Schober, B., & Strohmeier, D. (2016). Implementing intervention research into public policy—The “I3-approach.”. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0638-3.
- Sundell, K., Beelmann, A., Hasson, H., & von Thiele Schwarz, U. (2016). Novel programs, international adoptions, or contextual adaptations? Meta-analytical results from German and Swedish intervention research. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45, 784–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1020540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wathen, C. N., & MacMillan, H. L. (2015). The role of integrated knowledge translation in intervention research. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0564-9.
- Wilson, P., Rush, R., Hussey, S., Puckering, C., Sim, F., Allely, C. S., Allely, C. S., Doku, P., & Gillberg, C. (2012). How evidence-based is an “evidence-based parenting program”? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P. BMC Medicine, 10, 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar