Prevention Science

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 469–480 | Cite as

Reducing Truancy and Fostering a Willingness to Attend School: Results from a Randomized Trial of a Police-School Partnership Program

  • Lorraine Mazerolle
  • Emma Antrobus
  • Sarah Bennett
  • Elizabeth Eggins


Truancy is a major social issue that is linked to a range of poor outcomes across the life course, including poor educational outcomes, drug and alcohol abuse, and antisocial behavior. Interventions that seek to reduce truancy problems range from school-based police officers to programs that reward good attendance to community-based interventions. This study reports primary outcome results of a randomized trial of a collaborative, police–school partnership that sought to reduce truancy and increase students’ willingness to attend school. Using school attendance and students’ self-report survey data, we find that the police–school partnership intervention shows promise for reducing truancy and improving students’ willingness to attend school. We conclude that police–school partnerships that foster the willingness of young people to attend school should be examined in future evaluation research and be considered in the development of truancy prevention programs.


Truancy School attendance Delinquency Schools Police partnerships 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship (2010–2015; grant number FL100100014) that funded the experimental evaluation of the Ability School Engagement Program (ASEP). We also acknowledge the ongoing support from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course. As with any large-scale trial, the work that is presented in this paper is made possible by the dedication, passion, and professionalism of a large number of very special people. We are, therefore, indebted to the project team at the University of Queensland, our Ph.D. students, as well as the dedicated operational team from the Queensland Police Service, the Department of Education, and the facilitating team drawn from the Department of Justice and Attorney General (previously Department of Communities). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors. Responsibility for any errors of omission or commission remains with the authors.

Compliance with Ethical Standards


Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship (2010–2015; grant number FL100100014) funded the experimental evaluation of ASEP.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethics approval was granted by the University of Queensland Behavioral and Social Sciences Ethical Review Committee (Project Number: 2010000500).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

11121_2017_771_MOESM1_ESM.docx (27 kb)
Table S1 (DOCX 26 kb)
11121_2017_771_MOESM2_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Table S2 (DOCX 21 kb)


  1. Askeland, K. G., Haugland, S., Stormark, K. M., Bøe, T., & Hysing, M. (2015). Adolescent school absenteeism and service use in a population-based study. BMC Public Health, 15(1). doi:  10.1186/s12889-015-1978-9.
  2. Attwood, G., & Croll, P. (2015). Truancy and well-being among secondary school pupils in England. Educational Studies, 41(1–2), 14–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balfanz, R., & Byrnes, V. (2012). The importance of being there: A report on absenteeism in the nation’s public schools (technical report). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University School of Education.Google Scholar
  4. Barnsdale, L., & Walker, M. (2007). Examining the use and impact of family group conferencing. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Executive Education Department.Google Scholar
  5. Battin-Pearson, S., Newcomb, M. D., Abbott, R. D., Hill, K. G., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (2000). Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 568–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond, L., Thomas, L., Toumbourou, J., Patton, G., & Catalano, R. (2000). Improving the lives of young Victorians in our community: A survey of risk and protective factors. Victoria, Australia: Centre for Adolescent Health.Google Scholar
  7. Bowles, R., Reyes, M. G., & Pradiptyo, R. (2005). National evaluation of the safer schools partnerships program. London: Youth Justice Board for England and Wales.Google Scholar
  8. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Braithwaite, V., Harris, N., & Ivec, M. (2009). Seeking to clarify child protection’s regulatory principles. Communities, Children & Families Australia, 4(1), 7–23.Google Scholar
  10. Cameron, L., & Thorsborne, M. (1999). Restorative justice and school discipline: Mutually exclusive? A practitioner’s view of the impact of community conferencing in Queensland schools. Paper presented at the Reshaping Australian Institutions Conference: Restorative Justice and Civil Society, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Chou, L. C., Ho, C. Y., Chen, C. Y., & Chen, W. J. (2006). Truancy and illicit drug use among adolescents surveyed via street outreach. Addictive Behaviors, 31(1), 149–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Coelho, R., Fischer, S., McKnight, F., Matteson, S., & Schwartz, T. (2015). The effects of early chronic absenteeism on third-grade academic achievement measures. Madison, WI: Robert M. La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connolly, M., & Masson, J. (2014). Private and public voices: Does family group conferencing privilege the voice of children and families in child welfare? The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 36(4), 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Converse, N., & Lignugaris-Kraft, B. (2009). Evaluation of a school-based mentoring program for at-risk middle school youth. Remedial & Special Education, 30(1), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crampton, D. (2007). Family group decision-making: A promising practice in need of more program theory and research. Child & Family Social Work, 12(2), 202–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crawford, A., & L’Hoiry, X. (2015). Partnerships in the delivery of policing and safeguarding children. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  18. Daraganova, G., Mullan, K., & Edwards, B. (2014). Attendance in primary school: Factors and consequences (occasional paper no. 51). Canberra: Strategic Policy and Research Branch, Department of Social Services.Google Scholar
  19. Dembo, R., Briones-Robinson, R., Ungaro, R. A., Gulledge, L. M., Karas, L. M., Winters, K. C., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2012). Emotional psychological and related problems among truant youths: An exploratory latent class analysis. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 20(3), 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dickson, E. A., & Hutchinson, T. C. (2010). Truancy and the law in Australia: The Queensland example. International Journal of Law & Education, 15(2), 87–102.Google Scholar
  21. Elizondo, F., Feske, K., Edgull, D., & Walsh, K. (2003). Creating synergy through collaboration: Safe schools/ healthy students in Salinas, California. Psychology in the Schools, 40(5), 503–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Finn, P., & McDevitt, J. (2005). National assessment of school resource officer programs final project report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  23. Flaherty, C. W., Sutphen, R. D., & Ely, G. E. (2012). Examining substance abuse in truant youths and their caregivers: Implications for truancy intervention. Children & Schools, 34(4), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flanagan, M. (2006). The effects of a positive behavior support program on the attendance behaviors of students with and without disabilities in a large inner-city public high school. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3225140).Google Scholar
  25. Ford, J., & Sutphen, R. D. (1996). Early intervention to improve attendance in elementary school for at-risk children: A pilot program. Children & Schools, 18(2), 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forrest, W., & Edwards, B. (2015). Early onset of crime and delinquency among Australian children. In Australian Institute of Family Studies (Ed.), The longitudinal study of Australian children annual statistical report 2014 (pp. 131–150). Australian Institute of Family Studies: Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  27. Frost, N., Abram, F., & Burgess, H. (2014a). Family group conferences: Context, process and ways forward. Child & Family Social Work, 19(4), 480–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frost, N., Abram, F., & Burgess, H. (2014b). Family group conferences: Evidence, outcomes and future research. Child & Family Social Work, 19(4), 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gewandter, J. S., Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., McDermott, M. P., Baron, R., Gastonguay, M. R., et al. (2014). Research designs for proof-of-concept chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. PAIN®, 155(9), 1683–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gittell, J. H. (2006). Relational coordination: Coordinating work through relationships of shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect. In O. Kyriakidou & M. F. Ozbilgin (Eds.), Relational perspectives in organizational studies: A research companion (pp. 74–94). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  31. Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research in prevention science: Next generation. Prevention Science, 16(7), 893–926.Google Scholar
  32. Hancock, K. J., Shepherd, C. C. J., Lawrence, D., & Zubrick, S. R. (2013). Student attendance and educational outcomes: Every day counts. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  33. Harris, N. (2008). Family group conferencing in Australia: 15 years on (child abuse prevention issues no. 27). Canberra: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  34. Henry, K. L., & Huizinga, D. H. (2007). Truancy’s effect on the onset of drug use among urban adolescents placed at risk. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(4), 358.e9–358.e17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Herrick, L. (1992). Effects of an attendance incentive program for chronically absent elementary school students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 9331147).Google Scholar
  36. Hess, A. M. (1990). The effects of contingency contracting and parent training on the truant behavior and classroom performance of students with mild handicaps (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 9030200).Google Scholar
  37. Howell, D. (2010). Statistical methods for psychology (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage.Google Scholar
  38. Kearney, C. A. (2008a). School absenteeism and school refusal behavior in youth: A contemporary review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(3), 451–471.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kearney, C. A. (2008b). An interdisciplinary model of school absenteeism in youth to inform professional practice and policy. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klima, T., Miller, M. G., & Nunlist, C. (2009). What works? Targeted truancy and dropout programs in middle and high school. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  41. Maynard, B. R., McCrea, K. T., Pigott, T. D., & Kelly, M. S. (2013). Indicated truancy interventions for chronic truant students: A Campbell systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mazerolle, L. (2014). The power of policing partnerships: Sustaining the gains. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(3), 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mazerolle, L., & Ransley, J. (2006). Third party policing. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51(1), 33–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McGarrell, E. F., & Hipple, N. K. (2007). Family group conferencing and re-offending among first-time juvenile offenders: The Indianapolis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 24(2), 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Monahan, K. C., VanDerhei, S., Bechtold, J., & Cauffman, E. (2014). From the school yard to the squad car: School discipline, truancy, and arrest. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 43(7), 1110–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mueller, D., & Stoddard, C. (2006). Dealing with chronic absenteeism and its related consequences: The process and short-term effects of a diversionary juvenile court intervention. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 11(2), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Murphy, K., Tyler, T. R., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law? Regulation & Governance, 3, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Na, C., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2013). Police officers in schools: Effects on school crime and the processing of offending behaviors. Justice Quarterly, 30(4), 619–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Petrosino, A., Guckenburg, S., & Fronius, T. (2012). “Policing schools” strategies: A review of the evaluation evidence. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 8(17), 80–101.Google Scholar
  51. Queensland Government, Department of Education and Training. (2013). Performance insights: School attendance. Brisbane: Author.Google Scholar
  52. Queensland Government, Department of Education and Training (2016). Managing student absences and enforcing enrolment and attendance at state schools (version 4.0). Brisbane: Author.Google Scholar
  53. Raymond, B. (2010). Assigning police officers to schools (problem-oriented guides for police: Response guides no. 10). Washington, DC: Center for Problem-Oriented Policing.Google Scholar
  54. Rocque, M., Jennings, W. G., Piquero, A. R., Ozkan, T., & Farrington, D. P. (2016). The importance of school attendance: Findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development on the Life-Course Effects of Truancy. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
  55. Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Barnes, G., Woods, D., Bennett, S., Inkpen, N., et al. (2015). Twelve experiments in restorative justice: The Jerry Lee program of randomized trials of restorative justice conferences. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(4), 501–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Solakoglu, O., & Orak, U. (2016). School truancy among Turkish high school students: A test of general strain theory. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1460–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sutphen, R. D., Ford, J. P., & Flaherty, C. (2010). Truancy interventions: A review of the research literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 20(2), 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Wilson, S. J. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of dropout prevention programs on school absenteeism. Prevention Science, 14(5), 468–478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Teasley, M. L. (2004). Absenteeism and truancy: Risk, protection, and best practice implications for school social workers. Children & Schools, 26(2), 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thornton, M., Darmody, M., & McCoy, S. (2013). Persistent absenteeism among Irish primary school pupils. Educational Review, 65(4), 488–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Restorative justice and procedural justice: Dealing with rule breaking. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tyler, T. R., Sherman, L., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., & Woods, D. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: The engagement of offenders’ psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-and-driving experiment. Law & Society Review, 41(3), 553–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vaughn, M. G., Maynard, B. R., Salas-Wright, C. P., Perron, B. E., & Abdon, A. (2013). Prevalence and correlates of truancy in the US: Results from a national sample. Journal of Adolescence, 36(4), 767–776.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Wachtel, T. (2013). Defining restorative. International Institute for Restorative Practices Graduate School. Retrieved from
  65. White, M. D., Fyfe, J. J., Campbell, S. P., & Goldkamp, J. S. (2001). The school-police partnership: Identifying at-risk youth through a truant recovery program. Evaluation Review, 25(5), 507–532.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social ScienceUniversity of QueenslandSt. LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations