Sex on the Beach: The Influence of Social Norms and Trip Companion on Spring Break Sexual Behavior
Spring Break trips are associated with heavy drinking and with risky sexual behavior (e.g., unprotected sex, multiple partners, unwanted sexual contact), especially for those students who go on trips with friends. The present study adds to this growing event-specific risk literature by examining Spring Break-specific normative perceptions of sexual risk behavior and the role that these perceptions and taking a trip with a friend or with a romantic partner have on Spring Break sexual behavior. College students (N = 1,540; 53.9 % female) were asked to report descriptive normative perceptions of sex with casual partners, drinking prior to sex, number of drinks prior to sex, and condom use as well as their own Spring Break drinking and sexual behaviors. Students perceived the typical same-sex student to have engaged in more frequent sexual behavior for all outcomes than students’ own self-reported sexual behavior. Furthermore, results revealed that these perceptions were positively associated with behavior. The choice of travel companion (friend(s) versus romantic partner) also differentially predicted sexual behaviors. Results suggested that intervention efforts aimed at reducing risks for Spring Break trip-takers may be strongest when they incorporate corrective normative information and target those traveling with friends.
KeywordsSpring Break Event-specific risk Social norms Sexual behavior Alcohol College students
- Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
- Collins, R., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 189–200. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.53.2.189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee, C.M., Neighbors, C., Lewis, M.A., Kaysen, D.L., Mittmann, A., Geisner, I.M., Larimer, M.E. (2014). Randomized controlled trial of a spring break intervention to reduce high-risk drinking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar
- Lewis, M. A., Lindgren, K. P., Fossos, N., Oster-Aaland, L., & Neighbors, C. (2009a). Examining the relationship between typical drinking behavior and 21st birthday drinking behavior among college students: Implications for event-specific prevention. Addiction, 104, 760–767. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02518.x.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewis, M. A., Litt, D. M., Cronce, J. M., Blayney, J. A., & Gilmore, A. K. (2014). Underestimating protection and overestimating risk: Examining descriptive normative perceptions and their association with drinking and sexual behaviors. The Journal of Sex Research, 51, 86–96. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.710664.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neighbors, C., Foster, D., Fossos, N., & Lewis, M. A. (2012). Windows of risk: Event and contexts associated with extreme drinking. In C. Correia, J. Murphy, & N. Barnett (Eds.), College student alcohol abuse: A guide to assessment, intervention, and prevention (pp. 53–80). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
- Patrick, M. E., Lewis, M. A., Lee, C. M., & Maggs, J. L. (2013). Semester and event-specific motives for alcohol use during spring break: Associated protective strategies and negative consequences. Addictive Behaviors, 38, 1980–1987. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.11.012.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patrick, M. E., Lee, C. M., & Neighbors, C. (2014). Changing perceived norms but not alcohol use: Lessons learned from a web-based college student spring break intervention.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, C. (2004, March). Gimme a break. Advertising Age. Retrieved from http://adage.com/.
- Snyder, S. L., & Misera, L. (2008). College students’ perceptions of a safe spring break event: An event specific prevention program. Californian Journal of Health Promotion, 6, 84–92.Google Scholar