Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 745–756 | Cite as

Examining the Process of Change in an Evidence-Based Parent Training Intervention: A Qualitative Study Grounded in the Experiences of Participants

  • Kendal HoltropEmail author
  • J. Rubén Parra-Cardona
  • Marion S. Forgatch
Article

Abstract

While strong research evidence demonstrates that parent training interventions are capable of preventing child behavioral problems, much less is known about how the participants in these programs experience the change process. The purpose of this study was to provide a better understanding of how parents’ experiences in an evidence-based parent training intervention led to change in their parenting practices, based on the first-person accounts of program participants. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth, individual interviews with parents who had completed the intervention known as Parent Management Training—the Oregon Model (PMTO™). Data were analyzed according to principles of the grounded theory approach, using the constant comparative method and a sequential process of open, axial, and selective coding. Study findings suggest that parents make active and intentional efforts to attempt, appraise, and apply the intervention material within their various life contexts, contributing to change in their parenting practices. Aspects of intervention content, method of delivery, and the role of the interventionist were also found to be important. This study can guide further prevention research into the mechanisms of change operating in parent training interventions and has the potential to inform continued efforts to adapt and implement evidence-based parent training interventions.

Keywords

Parent training intervention Process of change Qualitative research 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the state department of community health, the participating community mental health agencies, and the parents who made this study possible.

References

  1. American Psychological Association Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice with Children and Adolescents. (2008). Disseminating evidence-based practice for children and adolescents: A systems approach to enhancing care. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. DeGarmo, D. S., Eddy, J. M., Reid, J. B., & Fetrow, R. A. (2009). Evaluating mediators of the impact of the linking the interests of families and teachers (LIFT) multimodal preventive intervention on substance use initiation and growth across adolescence. Prevention Science, 10, 208–220. doi: 10.1007/s11121-009-0126-0.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Essau, C. A. (2003). Preface. In C. A. Essau (Ed.), Conduct and oppositional defiant disorders: Epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment (pp. vii–viii). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Fassinger, R. E. (2005). Paradigms, praxis, problems, and promise: Grounded theory in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 156–166. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (1999). Parenting through change: An effective prevention program for single mothers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 711–724. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.711.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Forgatch, M. S., & Martinez, C. R., Jr. (1999). Parent management training: A program linking basic research and practical application. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 36, 923–937.Google Scholar
  7. Forgatch, M. S., & Patterson, G. R. (2010). Parent Management Training—Oregon Model: An intervention for antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. In J. R. Weisz & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (2nd ed., pp. 159–178). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  8. Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., DeGarmo, D. S., & Beldavs, Z. G. (2009). Testing the Oregon delinquency model with 9-year follow-up of the Oregon Divorce Study. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 637–660. doi: 10.1017/S0954579409000340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster, E. M., Jones, D. E., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2005). The high costs of aggression: Public expenditures resulting from conduct disorder. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1767–1772. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061424.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley: Sociology.Google Scholar
  11. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  12. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hawker, S., & Kerr, C. (2007). Doing grounded theory. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 87–97). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill, C. E., & Lambert, M. J. (2004). Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy processes and outcomes. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 84–135). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. International, Q. S. R. (2010). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 9). [Computer software]. Doncaster: QSR International.Google Scholar
  16. Kazdin, A. E. (2004). Psychotherapy for children and adolescents. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 543–589). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Parent management training: Treatment for oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kazdin, A. E., & Nock, M. K. (2003). Delineating mechanisms of change in child and adolescent therapy: Methodological issues and research recommendations. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 1116–1129. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kazdin, A. E., & Rotella, C. (2008). The Kazdin method for parenting the defiant child: With no pills, no therapy, no contest of wills. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  20. Kjøbli, J., & Ogden, T. (2012). A randomized effectiveness trial of brief parent training in primary care settings. Prevention Science, 13, 616–626. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0289-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Knutson, N. M., Forgatch, M. S., Rains, L. A., & Sigmarsdóttir, M. (2009). Fidelity of Implementation Rating System (FIMP): The manual for PMTO™ (revised ed.). Eugene: Implementation Sciences International.Google Scholar
  22. Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy, 38, 357–361. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 837–857. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00179.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levac, A. M., McCay, E., Merka, P., & Reddon-D’Arcy, M. L. (2008). Exploring parent participation in a parent training program for children’s aggression: Understanding and illuminating mechanisms of change. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 21, 78–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2008.00135.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Loeber, R., Burke, J. D., & Pardini, D. A. (2009). Development and etiology of disruptive and delinquent behavior. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 291–310. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250–260. doi: 10.1037/0022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ogden, T., & Hagen, K. A. (2008). Treatment effectiveness of Parent Management Training in Norway: A randomized controlled trial of children with conduct problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 607–621. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.4.607.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Patterson, G. R., & Chamberlain, P. (1994). A functional analysis of resistance during parent training therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1, 53–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1994.tb00006.x.Google Scholar
  31. Patterson, J., Mockford, C., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2005). Parents’ perceptions of the value of the Webster–Stratton parenting programme: a qualitative study of a general practice based initiative. Child: Care, Health and Development, 31, 53–64. doi: 10.1111/j.13652214.2005.00479.x.Google Scholar
  32. Patterson, G. R., Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2010). Cascading effects following intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 949–970. doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000568.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Payne, S. (2007). Grounded theory. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 65–86). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petra, M., & Kohl, P. (2010). Pathways Triple P and the child welfare system: A promising fit. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 611–618. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.12.008.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanders, M. R., Turner, K. M. T., & Markie-Dadds, C. (2002). The development and dissemination of the Triple P—Positive Parenting Program: A multilevel, evidence-based system of parenting and family support. Prevention Science, 3, 173–189. doi: 10.1023/A:1019942516231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Spitzer, A., Webster-Stratton, C., & Hollingsworth, T. (1991). Coping with conduct-problem children: Parents gaining knowledge and control. Journal of Clinical Child Psychiatry, 20, 413–427. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2004_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stoolmiller, M., Duncan, T., Bank, L., & Patterson, G. R. (1993). Some problems and solutions in the study of change: Significant patters in client resistance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 920–928. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.61.6.920.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M. J., & Hammond, M. (2001). Preventing conduct problems, promoting social competence: A parent and teacher training partnership in Head Start. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 30, 283–302. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3003_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kendal Holtrop
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Rubén Parra-Cardona
    • 2
  • Marion S. Forgatch
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Family and Child SciencesThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Oregon Social Learning CenterEugeneUSA
  4. 4.Implementation Sciences International, IncEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations