Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 448–459 | Cite as

Supporting the Transition to Adulthood among High School Dropouts: An Impact Study of the National Guard Youth Challenge Program

  • Megan Millenky
  • Sarah E. O. Schwartz
  • Jean E. Rhodes
Article

Abstract

Using a multi-year, random assignment design, this study evaluated the effects of the National Guard Youth Challenge Program (NGYCP), an intensive residential intervention program for youth ages 16–18 who have dropped out of high school. The sample included 1,173 youth (predominantly male) of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds from ten NGYCP sites across the country. Positive impacts on educational and employment outcomes were sustained 3 years after entering the program, with older participants generally showing greater benefits than younger participants. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

High school dropout Transition to adulthood Impact study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge David Van Patten and Dare Mighty Things, Dan Bloom, and other members of the Challenge evaluation team and the support of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, MCJ Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and the US Department of Defense.

References

  1. Alliance for Excellent Education. (2006). Healthier and wealthier: Decreasing health care costs by increasing educational attainment. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.Google Scholar
  2. Berlin, G., Furstenberg, F., & Waters, M. C. (2010). The transition to adulthood: Introducing the issue. The Future of Children, 20, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloom, D. (2010). Programs and policies to assist high school dropouts in the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20, 89–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom, D., Gardenhire-Crooks, A., & Mandsager, C. (2009). Reengaging high school dropouts: Early results of the National Guard Youth Challenge Program Evaluation. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
  5. Brock, T. (2010). Young adults and higher education: Barriers and breakthroughs to success. The Future of Children, 20, 109–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Caspi, A., Wright, B. E., Moffit, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1998). Childhood predictors of unemployment in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 63, 424–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cave, G., Bos, H., Doolittle, F., & Toussaint, C. (1993). JOBSTART: Final Report on a Program for School Dropouts. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Healthy Weight. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/index.html.
  9. Cohen, M. A. (1998). The monetary value of saving a high-risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 5–33. doi: 10.1007/s10940-008-9057-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cullinan, M., Eaves, J. K., McCurdy, D., & McCain, J. (1992). Forging a military youth corps: A military-youth service partnership for high school dropouts. The final report of the CSIS National Community Service for Out-of-School Youth Project. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
  11. Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (1995). Does Head Start make a difference? The American Economic Review, 85, 341–364.Google Scholar
  12. Danziger, S., & Ratner, D. (2010). Labor market outcomes and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20, 133–158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fergusson, D. M., Swain-Campbell, N., & Horwood, J. L. (2002). Outcomes of leaving school without formal educational qualifications. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 37, 39–55. doi: 10.1177/000494410805200206.Google Scholar
  14. Godley, S. H., Godley, M. D., & Dennis, M. L. (2001). The assertive aftercare protocol for adolescent substance abusers. In E. Wagner & H. Waldron (Eds.), Innovations in adolescent substance abuse interventions (pp. 311–329). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. Greenwood, P. S. (1998). Diverting children from a life of crime: Measuring costs and benefits. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  16. Jeffery, R. W., Epstein, L. H., Wilson, T. G., Drewnowski, A., Stunkard, A. J., & Wing, R. R. (2000). Long-term maintenance of weight loss: Current status. Health Psychology, 19, 5–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lerner, R. M. (2004). Diversity in individual context relations as the basis for positive development across the life span: A developmental systems perspective for theory, research, and application. Research in Human Development, 1, 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lerner, R. M. (2005). Promoting positive youth development: Theoretical and empirical bases. White paper prepared for Workshop on the Science of Adolescent Health and Development. Retrieved June 1, 2011 from ase.tufts.edu/iaryd/documents/pubPromotingPositive.pdf.
  20. Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2012). Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings 2011. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  21. Millenky, M., Bloom, D., & Dillon, C. (2010). Interim Results of the National Guard Youth Challenge Evaluation. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
  22. Millenky, M., Bloom, D., Muller-Ravett, S., & Broadus, J. (2011). Three-year results of the National Guard Youth Challenge evaluation. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
  23. National Guard Bureau. (2010). An assessment of the Youth Challenge Program: 2010 performance and accountability highlights. Chantilly, VA: AOC Solutions, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Orr, L. L., Bloom, H. S., Bell, S. H., Doolittle, F., Lin, W., & Cave, G. (1997). Does training for the disadvantaged work? Evidence from the National JTPA Study. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.Google Scholar
  25. Quint, J. C., Bos, J. M., & Polit, D. F. (1997). New Chance: Final Report on a Comprehensive Program for Young Mothers in Poverty and their Children. New York, NY: MDRC.Google Scholar
  26. Rhodes, J. E. (2005). A model of youth mentoring. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 30–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schochet, P. Z., Burghardt, J., & McConnell, S. (2006). National Job Corps Study and Longer-Term Follow-Up Study: Impact and Benefit-Cost Findings Using Survey and Summary Earnings Records Data. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.Google Scholar
  29. Schochet, P. Z., McConnell, S., & Burghardt, J. (2003). National Job Corps Study: Findings Using Administrative Earnings Records Data. Final Report. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.Google Scholar
  30. Swanson, C. B. (2008). Cities in Crisis: A Special Analytic Report on High School Graduation. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education.Google Scholar
  31. Theokas, C., & Lerner, R. M. (2006). Promoting positive development in adolescence: The role of ecological assets in families, schools, and neighborhoods. Applied Developmental Science, 10, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megan Millenky
    • 1
  • Sarah E. O. Schwartz
    • 2
  • Jean E. Rhodes
    • 2
  1. 1.Family Well-Being and Child Development PolicyMDRCNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations