Prevention Science

, Volume 15, Supplement 1, pp 19–32 | Cite as

The Onset of STI Diagnosis Through Age 30: Results from the Seattle Social Development Project Intervention

  • Karl G. Hill
  • Jennifer A. Bailey
  • J. David Hawkins
  • Richard F. Catalano
  • Rick Kosterman
  • Sabrina Oesterle
  • Robert D. Abbott
Article

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to examine (1) whether the onset of sexually transmitted infections (STI) through age 30 differed for youths who received a social developmental intervention during elementary grades compared to those in the control condition; (2) potential social-developmental mediators of this intervention; and (3) the extent to which these results differed by ethnicity. A nonrandomized controlled trial followed participants to age 30, 18 years after the intervention ended. Three intervention conditions were compared: a full-intervention group, assigned to intervention in grades 1 through 6; a late intervention group, assigned to intervention in grades 5 and 6 only; and a no-treatment control group. Eighteen public elementary schools serving diverse neighborhoods including high-crime neighborhoods of Seattle are the setting of the study. Six hundred eight participants in three intervention conditions were interviewed from age 10 through 30. Interventions include teacher training in classroom instruction and management, child social and emotional skill development, and parent workshops. Outcome is the cumulative onset of participant report of STI diagnosis. Adolescent family environment, bonding to school, antisocial peer affiliation, early sex initiation, alcohol use, cigarette use, and marijuana use were tested as potential intervention mechanisms. Complementary log–log survival analysis found significantly lower odds of STI onset for the full-intervention compared to the control condition. The lowering of STI onset risk was significantly greater for African Americans and Asian Americans compared to European Americans. Family environment, school bonding, and delayed initiation of sexual behavior mediated the relationship between treatment and STI hazard. A universal intervention for urban elementary school children, focused on classroom management and instruction, children’s social competence, and parenting practices may reduce the onset of STI through age 30, especially for African Americans.

Keywords

Intervention Prevention Sexually transmitted infection Mediation Survival analysis Adolescence Adulthood 

Supplementary material

11121_2013_382_MOESM1_ESM.docx (51 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 50 kb)

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Aos, S., Lieb, R., Mayfield, J., Miller, M., & Pennucci, A. (2004). Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth. Retrieved 27 September 2004 from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/pub.asp?docid=04-07-3901.
  3. Arbuckle, J. A. (2009). Amos 18 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, J. A. (2009). Editorial: Addressing common risk and protective factors can prevent a wide range of adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 107–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2002. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  8. DeGarmo, D. S., Eddy, J. M., Reid, J. B., & Fetrow, R. A. (2009). Evaluating mediators of the impact of the Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers (LIFT) multimodal preventive intervention on substance use initiation and growth across adolescence. Prevention Science, 10, 208–220.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dielman, T. E. (1994). Correction for the design effect in school-based substance use and abuse prevention research: Sample size requirements and analysis considerations. In A. Cázares & L. A. Beatty (Eds.), NIDA Research Monograph: Vol. 139. Scientific methods for prevention intervention research (pp. 115–126). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  10. Gavin, L., MacKay, A. P., Brown, K., Harrier, S., Ventura, S. J., Kann, L., et al. (2009). Sexual and reproductive health of persons aged 10–24 years—United States, 2002–2007. MMWR, 58, 1–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gavin, L., Catalano, R. F., David-Ferdon, C., Gloppen, K. M., & Markham, C. M. (2010). A review of positive youth development programs that promote adolescent sexual and reproductive health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46, S75–S91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook, R. L., Pollock, N. K., Rao, A. K., & Clark, D. B. (2002). Increased prevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 among adolescent women with alcohol use disorders. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30(3), 169–174.Google Scholar
  13. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graham, J. W., & Hofer, S. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multi-group data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Grunseit, A., Kippax, S., Aggleton, P., Baldo, M., & Slutkin, G. (1997). Sexuality education and young people’s sexual behavior: A review of studies. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 421–453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guo, J., Chung, I.-J., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Abbott, R. D. (2002). Developmental relationships between adolescent substance use and risky sexual behavior in young adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(4), 354–362.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkins, J. D., & Weis, J. G. (1985). The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 6, 73–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawkins, J. D., Doueck, H. J., & Lishner, D. M. (1988). Changing teaching practices in mainstream classrooms to improve bonding and behavior of low achievers. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkins, J. D., Von Cleve, E., & Catalano, R. F., Jr. (1991). Reducing early childhood aggression: Results of a primary prevention program. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 208–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Morrison, D. M., O’Donnell, J., Abbott, R. D., & Day, L. E. (1992). The Seattle Social Development Project: Effects of the first four years on protective factors and problem behaviors. In J. McCord & R. E. Tremblay (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 139–161). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  21. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. G. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 153, 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hawkins, J. D., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R. F., Hill, K. G., & Abbott, R. D. (2005). Promoting positive adult functioning through social development intervention in childhood: Long-term effects from the Seattle Social Development Project. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawkins, J. D., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R. F., Hill, K. G., & Abbott, R. D. (2008). Effects of social development intervention in childhood fifteen years later. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 162, 1133–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hedges, L. & Rhoads, C. (2009). Statistical Power Analysis in Education Research (NCSER 2010-3006). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. This report is available on the IES website at http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/.
  25. Kellam, S. G., & Rebok, G. W. (1992). Building developmental and etiological theory through epidemiologically based preventive intervention trials. In J. McCord & R. E. Tremblay (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 162–195). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  26. Keyes, M. A., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2007). Early onset problem behavior, young adult psychopathology, and contextual risk. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10(1), 45–53.Google Scholar
  27. Kirby, D. (2007). Emerging answers: Research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy. Retrieved September 2008 from http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/resources/pdf/pubs/EA2007_FINAL.pdf.
  28. Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Lonczak, H. S., Abbott, R. D., Hawkins, J. D., Kosterman, R., & Catalano, R. F. (2002). Effects of the Seattle Social Development Project on sexual behavior, pregnancy, birth, and sexually transmitted disease outcomes by age 21 years. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 156, 438–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lowry, R., Holtzman, D., Truman, B. I., Kann, L., Collins, J. L., & Kolbe, L. J. (1994). Substance use and HIV-related sexual behaviors among US high school students: Are they related? American Journal of Public Health, 84(7), 1116–1120.Google Scholar
  31. MacKinnon, D. P., & Lockwood, C. M. (2003). Advances in statistical methods for substance abuse prevention research. Prevention Science, 4, 155–171.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murray, D. M., Rooney, B. L., Hannan, P. J., Peterson, A. V., Ary, D. V., Biglan, A., et al. (1994). Intraclass correlation among common measures of adolescent smoking: Estimates, correlates, and applications in smoking prevention studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 140, 1038–1050.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nitz, K. (1999). Adolescent pregnancy prevention: A review of interventions and programs. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 457–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Connell, M. E., Boat, T., & Warner, K. E. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rotheram-Borus, M. J. (2000). Expanding the range of interventions to reduce HIV among adolescents. AIDS, 14, s33–s40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Valois, R. F., Oeltmann, J. E., Waller, J., & Hussey, J. R. (1999). Relationship between number of sexual intercourse partners and selected health risk behaviors among public high school adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 25(5), 328–335.Google Scholar
  38. Willett, J. B., Singer, J. D., & Martin, N. C. (1998). The design and analysis of longitudinal studies of development and psychopathology in context: Statistical models and methodological recommendations. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 395–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woods, W. J., Lindan, C. P., Hudes, E. S., Boscarino, J. A., Clark, W. W., & Avins, A. L. (2000). HIV infection and risk behaviors in two cross-sectional surveys of heterosexuals in alcoholism treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61(2), 262–266.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl G. Hill
    • 1
  • Jennifer A. Bailey
    • 1
  • J. David Hawkins
    • 1
  • Richard F. Catalano
    • 1
  • Rick Kosterman
    • 1
  • Sabrina Oesterle
    • 1
  • Robert D. Abbott
    • 2
  1. 1.Social Development Research Group, School of Social WorkUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Educational Psychology, College of EducationUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations