Prevention Science

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 150–161 | Cite as

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Communities That Care Outcomes at Eighth Grade

  • Margaret R. Kuklinski
  • John S. Briney
  • J. David Hawkins
  • Richard F. Catalano
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a cost-benefit analysis of the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention system, a public health approach to reducing risk, enhancing protection, and reducing the prevalence of adolescent health and behavior problems community wide. The analysis is based on outcomes from a panel of students followed from Grade 5 through Grade 8 in a randomized controlled trial involving 24 communities in 7 states. Previous analyses have shown that CTC prevented the initiation of cigarette smoking, alcohol use, and delinquency by the end of 8th grade in CTC communities compared to controls. This paper estimates long-term monetary benefits associated with significant intervention effects on cigarette smoking and delinquency as compared to the cost of conducting the intervention. Under conservative cost assumptions, the net present benefit is $5,250 per youth, including $812 from the prevention of cigarette smoking and $4,438 from the prevention of delinquency. The benefit-cost ratio indicates a return of $5.30 per $1.00 invested. Under less conservative but still viable cost assumptions, the benefit-cost ratio due to prevention of cigarette smoking and delinquency increases to $10.23 per $1.00 invested. Benefits from CTC’s reduction in alcohol initiation as well as broader inclusion of quality-of-life gains would further increase CTC’s benefit-cost ratio. Results provide evidence that CTC is a cost-beneficial preventive intervention and a good investment of public dollars, even under very conservative cost and benefit assumptions.

Keywords

Cost-benefit analysis Community-based intervention Prevention 

References

  1. Aos, S., Lieb, R., Mayfield, J., Miller, M., & Pennucci, A. (2004). Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth (Publication No. 04-07-3901). Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, W. S. (1993). Economic evaluation of home visiting programs. The Future of Children, 3, 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, W. S., & Masse, L. N. (2007). Comparative benefit–cost analysis of the Abecedarian Program and its policy implications. Economics of Education Review, 26, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belfield, C. R., Nores, M., Barnett, S., & Schweinhart, L. (2006). The High/Scope Perry Preschool Program: Cost–benefit analysis using data from the age-40 followup. The Journal of Human Resources, 41, 162–190.Google Scholar
  5. Breslau, N., & Peterson, E. L. (1996). Smoking cessation in young adults: Age at initiation of cigarette smoking and other suspected influences. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 214–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, E. C., Graham, J. W., Hawkins, J. D., Arthur, M. W., Baldwin, M. M., Oesterle, S., et al. (2009). Design and analysis of the Community Youth Development Study longitudinal cohort sample. Evaluation Review, 33, 311–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Occupational employment and wage estimates. Retrieved April 26, 2011 from http://bls.gov/oes/oes_data.htm.
  8. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011). National compensation survey. Employer costs for employee compensation. Historical listing, March 2004–December 2010. Retrieved April 26, 2011 from ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/ocwc/ect/ececqrtn.txt
  9. Caulkins, J. P., Rydell, C. P., Everingham, S. S., Chiesa, J., & Bushway, S. (1999). An ounce of prevention, a pound of uncertainty: The cost-effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, M. A., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). New evidence on the monetary value of saving a high risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2008). Implementing effective community-based prevention programs in the Community Youth Development Study. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6, 256–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., et al. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6, 151–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster, E. M., Dodge, K. A., & Jones, D. (2003). Issues in the economic evaluation of prevention programs. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 76–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster, E. M., Johnson-Shelton, D., & Taylor, T. K. (2007). Measuring time costs in interventions designed to reduce behavior problems among children and youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40, 64–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grant, B. F. (1998). Age at smoking onset and its association with alcohol consumption and DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: Results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey. Journal of Substance Abuse, 10, 59–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Arthur, M. W., Egan, E., Brown, E. C., Abbott, R. D., et al. (2008). Testing Communities That Care: The rationale, design and behavioral baseline equivalence of the Community Youth Development Study. Prevention Science, 9, 178–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawkins, J. D., Oesterle, S., Brown, E. C., Arthur, M. W., Abbott, R. D., Fagan, A. A., et al. (2009). Results of a type 2 translational research trial to prevent adolescent drug use and delinquency: A test of Communities That Care. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 163, 789–798.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawkins, J. D., Oesterle, S., Brown, E. C., Monahan, K. C., Abbott, R. D., Arthur, M. W., et al. (in press). Sustained decreases in risk exposure and youth problem behaviors after installation of the Communities That Care prevention system in a randomized trial. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, available online Oct 3, 2011; doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.183.
  19. Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2007). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29, 446–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heckman, J. J., Moon, S. H., Pinto, R., Savelyev, P. A., & Yavitz, A. (2010). The rate of return to the High/Scope Perry Preschool Program. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 114–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karoly, L. A., Kilburn, M. R., & Cannon, J. S. (2005). Early childhood interventions: Proven results, future promise. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  22. McCollister, K. E., French, M. T., & Fang, H. (2010). The cost of crime to society: New crime-specific estimates for policy and program evaluation. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 108, 98–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller, T. R., & Hendrie, D. (2008). Substance abuse dollars and cents: A cost-benefit analysis (DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 07–4298). Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, T. R., Cohen, M. A., & Wiersema, B. (1996). Victim costs and consequences: A new look. National Institute of Justice Research Report, NCJ 155282. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  25. Miller, T. R., Levy, D. T., Spicer, R. S., & Taylor, D. M. (2006). Societal costs of underage drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 519–528.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. National Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2010). Table 2.3.4. Price Indexes for Personal Consumption Expenditures by Major Type of Product. Line 1: Personal Consumption Expenditures, 2004–2008. Retrieved from http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/TableView.asp?SelectedTable=64&ViewSeries=NO&Java=no&Request3Place=N&3Place=N&FromView=YES&Freq=Year&FirstYear=2000&LastYear=2009&3Place=N&Update=Update&JavaBox=no
  27. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. (M. E. O’Connell, T. F. Boat, & K.W. Warner, Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  28. Piquero, A., Hawkins, J. D., & Kazemian, L. (in press). Criminal career patterns between adolescence and emerging adulthood. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Transitions from juvenile delinquency to adult crime: Criminal careers, justice policy and prevention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Plotnick, R. D., Young, D. S., Catalano, R. F., & Haggerty, K. P. (1998). Benefits and costs of a family-focused methadone treatment and drug abuse prevention program: Preliminary findings. In W. J. Bukoski & R. I. Evans (Eds.), NIDA Research Monograph: Vol. 176. Cost benefit/cost effectiveness research of drug abuse prevention: Implications for programming and policy (pp. 161–183). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  30. Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., White, B. A. B., Ou, S.-R., & Robertson, D. L. (2011). Age-26 cost-benefit analysis of the Child-Parent Center early education program. Child Development, 82, 379–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sanchez-Meca, J., Marin-Martinez, F., & Chacon-Moscoso, S. (2003). Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 8, 448–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sloan, F. A., Ostermann, J., Conover, C., Taylor, D. H., Jr., & Picone, G. (2004). The price of smoking. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  33. Spoth, R. L., Guyll, M., & Day, S. X. (2002). Universal family-focused interventions in alcohol-use disorder prevention: Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of two interventions. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 219–228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., & Turrisi, R. (2008). Preventive interventions addressing underage drinking: State of the evidence and steps toward public health impact. Pediatrics, 121(Suppl. 4), S311–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Temple, J. A., & Reynolds, A. J. (2007). Benefits and costs of investments in preschool education: Evidence from the Child–Parent Centers and related programs. Economics of Education Review, 26, 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zerbe, R. O., Plotnick, R. D., Kessler, R. C., Pecora, P. J., Hiripi, E., O'Brien, K., et al. (2009). Benefits and costs of intensive foster care services: The Casey Family Programs compared to state services. Contemporary Economic Policy, 27, 308–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret R. Kuklinski
    • 1
  • John S. Briney
    • 1
  • J. David Hawkins
    • 1
  • Richard F. Catalano
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Development Research Group, School of Social WorkUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations