Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 75–85 | Cite as

Evaluating the Impact of a Substance Use Intervention Program on the Peer Status and Influence of Adolescent Peer Leaders

  • Christopher S. Sheppard
  • Megan Golonka
  • Philip R. CostanzoEmail author
Article

Abstract

The current study involved an examination of the impact of a peer-led substance use intervention program on the peer leaders beyond the substance use-related goals of the intervention. Specifically, unintended consequences of an adult-sanctioned intervention on the targeted peer leader change agents were investigated, including whether their participation affected their peer status, social influence, or self perceptions. Twenty-two 7th grade peer-identified intervention leaders were compared to 22 control leaders (who did not experience the intervention) and 146 cohort peers. Three groups of measures were employed: sociometric and behavioral nominations, social cognitive mapping, and leadership self-perceptions. Results indicated that unintended consequences appear to be a legitimate concern for females. Female intervention leaders declined in perceived popularity and liked most nominations over time, whereas males increased in total leader nominations. Explanations for these results are discussed and further directions suggested.

Keywords

Adolescents Peer leaders Peer influence School-based prevention Substance use Social status 

Notes

Author Note

Portions of this research were presented at the 2010 biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence in Philadephia, PA. This research was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Grants P20 DA017589-02 and P30 DA023026. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIDA. The first and second authors received support from the Duke University Vertical Integration Program and the first author also was funded by a Jacqueline Anne Morris Research Fellowship. The authors are grateful to the adolescents and teachers who participated in this research and to the staff of the Center for Child and Family Policy for their contributions to data collection.

References

  1. Bagwell, C. L., Coie, J. D., Terry, R. A., & Lochman, J. E. (2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 45, 280–305.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bot, S. M., Engels, R. C. M. E., Knibbe, R. A., & Meeus, W. (2005). Friends’ drinking and adolescent alcohol consumption: The moderating role of friendship characteristics. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 929–947. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.09.012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Gest, S., & Gariepy, J.-L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? Developmental Psychology, 24, 815–823. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cairns, R. B., Gariepy, J.-L., & Kindermann, T. (1991). Identifying natural clusters in natural settings. Unpublished manuscript. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  6. Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, 5th edition, Volume 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 779–861). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Costanzo, P., & Shaw, M. (1966). Conformity as a function of age level. Child Development, 37, 967–975. Retrieved from: http://www.srcd.org/
  8. DeRosier, M. E., & Thomas, J. M. (2003). Strengthening sociometric prediction: Scientific advances in assessment of children’s peer relations. Child Development, 74, 1379–1392. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donaldson, S. I., Sussman, S., MacKinnon, D. P., Severson, H. H., Glynn, T., Murray, D. M., et al. (1996). Drug abuse prevention programming: Do we know what content works? American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 868–883. doi: 10.1177/0002764296039007008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engels, R., Scholte, R., van Lieshout, C., Kemp, R., & Overbeek, G. (2006). Peer group reputation and smoking and alcohol consumption in early adolescence. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 440–449. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farmer, T. W., & Rodkin, P. C. (1996). Antisocial and prosocial correlates of classroom social positions: The social network centrality perspective. Social Development, 5, 174–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.1996.tb00079.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farmer, T. W., Rodkin, P. C., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (1999). Teacher-assessed behavioral configurations, peer-assessments, and self-concepts of elementary students with mild disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 33, 66–80. doi: 10.1177/002246699903300201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flom, P. L., Friedman, S. R., Jose, B., & Curtis, R. (2001). Peer norms regarding drug use and drug selling among household youth in a low-income ‘drug supermarket’ urban neighborhood. Drugs: Education, Policy, and Prevention., 8, 219–232. doi: 10.1080/09687630124478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaughan, M. (2006). The gender structure of adolescent peer influence on drinking. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 47–61. doi: 10.1177/002214650604700104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Golonka, M., Peairs, K., Grimes, C. L., & Costanzo, P. R. (2007). Using natural peer leaders as substance use prevention agents: A preliminary trial. Paper presented at the 15th annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. Harrison, P. A., Fulkerson, J. A., & Park, E. (2000). The relative importance of social versus commercial sources in youth access to tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs. Preventive Medicine, 31, 39–48. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0691.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haynie, D. L. (2003). Contexts of risk? Explaining the link between girls’ pubertal development and their delinquency involvement. Social Forces, 82, 355–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hollingshead, A. B. (1979). Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  19. Kandel, D. B., & Adler, I. (1982). Socialization into marijuana use among French adolescents: A cross-cultural comparison with the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 23, 295–309. Retrieved from: http://www.asanet.org/journals/jhsb/index.cfm
  20. Killeya-Jones, L. A., Nakajima, R., & Costanzo, P. R. (2007). Peer standing and substance use in early-adolescent grade-level networks: A short-term longitiudinal study. Prevention Science, 8, 11–23. doi: 10.1007/s11121-006-0053-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lansford, J. E., Miller, S., Malone, P. S., Costanzo, P. R., Grimes, C., & Putallaz, M. (2009). Social network centrality and leadership status: Links with problem behaviors and tests of gender differences. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55, 1–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller-Johnson, S., & Costanzo, P. R. (2004). If you can’t beat ‘em…have them join you: Peer-based interventions during adolescence. In J. B. Kupersmidt & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Children’s peer relations: From development to intervention to policy: A festschrift in honor of John D. Coie (pp. 209–222). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller-Johnson, S., Costanzo, P. R., Coie, J. D., Rose, M. R., Browne, D. C., & Johnson, C. (2003). Peer social structure and risk-taking behaviors among African American early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 375–384. doi: 10.1023/A:1024926132419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olds, R. S., & Thombs, D. L. (2001). The relationship of adolescents’ perceptions of peer norms and parent involvement to cigarette and alcohol use. Journal of School Health, 71, 223–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2001.tb01322.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14–24. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sumter, S. R., Bokhorst, C. L., Steinberg, L., & Westenberg, P. M. (2009). The developmental pattern of resistance to peer influence in adolescence: Will the teenager ever be able to resist? Journal of Adolescence, 32, 1009–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.08.010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., & Pilgrim, C. (1997). Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Developmental Psychology, 33, 834–844. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.5.834.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Valente, T. W., Ritt-Olsen, A., Stacy, A., Unger, J. B., Okamato, J., & Sussman, S. (2007). Peer acceleration: Effects of a social network tailored substance abuse prevention program among high risk adolescents. Addiction, 102, 1804–1815. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01992.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Siebenbruner, J., & Collins, W. A. (2003). A prospective study of intraindividual and peer influences on adolescents’ heterosexual romantic and sexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 381–394. doi: 0004-0002/04/0800-0381/0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher S. Sheppard
    • 1
  • Megan Golonka
    • 1
  • Philip R. Costanzo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations