Prevention Science

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 411–423 | Cite as

Testing the Universality of the Effects of the Communities That Care Prevention System for Preventing Adolescent Drug Use and Delinquency

  • Sabrina Oesterle
  • J. David Hawkins
  • Abigail A. Fagan
  • Robert D. Abbott
  • Richard F. Catalano
Article

Abstract

Universal community-oriented interventions are an important component in the prevention of youth health and behavior problems. Testing the universality of the effects of an intervention that was designed to be universal is important because it provides information about how the program operates and for whom and under what conditions it is most effective. The present study examined whether the previously established significant effects of the universal, community-based Communities That Care (CTC) prevention program on the prevalence of substance use and the variety of delinquent behaviors held equally for boys and girls and in risk-related subgroups defined by early substance use, early delinquency, and high levels of community-targeted risk at baseline. Interaction analyses of data from a panel of 4,407 students followed from Grade 5 to Grade 8 in the first randomized trial of CTC in 12 matched community pairs suggests that CTC reduced students’ substance use and delinquency equally across risk-related subgroups and gender, with two exceptions: The effect of CTC on reducing substance use in 8th grade was stronger for boys than girls and the impact of CTC on reducing 8th-grade delinquency was stronger for students who were nondelinquent at baseline.

Keywords

Universal community intervention Risk moderation Gender Adolescents Substance use Delinquency 

References

  1. Allen, J. P., & Philliber, S. (2001). Who benefits most from a broadly targeted prevention program? Differential efficacy across populations in the Teen Outreach program. Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 637–655.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amaro, H., Blake, S. M., Schwartz, P. M., & Flinchbaugh, L. J. (2001). Developing theory-based substance abuse prevention programs for young adolescent girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 256–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglioni, A. J., Jr. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities That Care Youth Survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575–601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur, M. W., Glaser, R. R., & Hawkins, J. D. (2005). Steps towards community-level resilience: Community adoption of science-based prevention programming. In R. D. Peters, B. Leadbeater, & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Resilience in children, families, and communities: Linking context to practice and policy (pp. 177–194). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beach, S. R. H., Brody, G. H., Kogan, S. M., Philibert, R. A., Chen, Y. F., & Lei, M. K. (2009). Change in caregiver depression in response to parent training: Genetic moderation of intervention effects. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 112–117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blake, S. M., Amaro, H., Schwartz, P. M., & Flinchbaugh, L. J. (2001). A review of substance abuse prevention interventions for young adolescent girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 294–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botvin, G., Mihalic, S., & Grotpeter, J. K. (Eds.). (1998). Life skills training, vol. 5. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  8. Breslow, N., & Clayton, D. G. (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brody, G. H., Kogan, S. M., Chen, Y. F., & Murry, V. M. (2008). Long-term effects of the Strong African American Families Program on youths’ conduct problems. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 474–481.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, E. C., Hawkins, J. D., Arthur, M. W., Briney, J. S., & Abbott, R. D. (2007). Effects of Communities That Care on prevention services systems: Outcomes from the Community Youth Development Study at 1.5 years. Prevention Science, 8, 180–191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, C. H., Wang, W., Kellam, S. G., Muthen, B. O., Petras, H., Toyinbo, P., et al. (2008). Methods for testing theory and evaluating impact in randomized field trials: Intent-to-treat analyses for integrating the perspectives of person, place, and time. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, S74–S104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, E. C., Graham, J. W., Hawkins, J. D., Arthur, M. W., Baldwin, M. M., Oesterle, S., et al. (2009). Design and analysis of the Community Youth Development Study longitudinal cohort sample. Evaluation Review, 33, 311–334.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Chou, C. P., Montgomery, S., Pentz, M. A., Rohrbach, L. A., Johnson, C. A., Flay, B. R., et al. (1998). Effects of a community-based prevention program in decreasing drug use in high-risk adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 944–948.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (2007). Fast track randomized controlled trial to prevent externalizing psychiatric disorders: Findings from grades 3 to 9. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 1250–1262.Google Scholar
  17. Dawson-McClure, S. R., Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., & Millsap, R. E. (2004). Risk as a moderator of the effects of prevention programs for children from divorced families: A six-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 175–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisen, M., Zellman, G. L., Massett, H. A., & Murray, D. M. (2002). Evaluating the Lions-Quest “Skills for Adolescence” drug education program: First-year behavior outcomes. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 619–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellickson, P. L., & Bell, R. M. (1990). Drug prevention in junior high: A multi-site longitudinal test. Science, 247, 1299–1305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott, D. S., & Mihalic, S. (2004). Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prevention Science, 5, 47–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fagan, A. A., Van Horn, M. L., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2007). Gender similarities and differences in the association between risk and protective factors and self-reported serious delinquency. Prevention Science, 8, 115–124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2008a). Bridging science to practice: Achieving prevention program implementation fidelity in the Community Youth Development Study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 235–249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2008b). Implementing effective community-based prevention programs in the Community Youth Development Study. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6, 256–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2009). Translational research in action: Implementation of the Communities That Care prevention system in 12 communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 809–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., et al. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6, 151–175.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Foley, A. (2008). The current state of gender-specific delinquency programming. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gardner, F., Connell, A., Trentacosta, C. J., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2009). Moderators of outcome in a brief family-centered intervention for preventing early problem behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 543–553.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Glaser, R. R., Van Horn, M. L., Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2005). Measurement properties of the Communities That Care Youth Survey across demographic groups. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gottfredson, D. C., & Wilson, D. B. (2003). Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prevention Science, 4, 27–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Graham, J. W., Taylor, B. J., Olchowski, A. E., & Cumsille, P. E. (2006). Planned missing data designs in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 11, 323–343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Guyll, M., Spoth, R. L., Chao, W., Wickrama, K. A. S., & Russell, D. (2004). Family-focused preventive interventions: Evaluating parental risk moderation of substance use trajectories. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 293–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hawkins, J. D., Brown, E. C., Oesterle, S., Arthur, M. W., Abbott, R. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2008). Early effects of Communities That Care on targeted risks and initiation of delinquent behavior and substance use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 15–22.Google Scholar
  33. Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2002). Investing in your community’s youth: An introduction to the Communities That Care system. South Deerfield, MA: Channing Bete.Google Scholar
  34. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Arthur, M. W. (2002). Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 951–976.Google Scholar
  35. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Arthur, M. W., Egan, E., Brown, E. C., Abbott, R. D., et al. (2008). Testing Communities That Care: The rationale, design and behavioral baseline equivalence of the Community Youth Development Study. Prevention Science, 9, 178–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hawkins, J. D., Oesterle, S., Brown, E. C., Arthur, M. W., Abbott, R. D., Fagan, A. A., et al. (2009). Results of a type 2 translational research trial to prevent adolescent drug use and delinquency: A test of Communities That Care. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163, 789–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kellam, S. G., Brown, C. H., Poduska, J. M., Ialongo, N. S., Wang, W., Toyinbo, P., et al. (2008). Effects of a universal classroom behavior management program in first and second grades on young adult behavioral, psychiatric, and social outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, S5–S28.Google Scholar
  38. Kellam, S. G., Ling, X., Merisca, R., Brown, C. H., & Ialongo, N. (1998). The effect of the level of aggression in the first grade classroom on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior into middle school. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 165–185.Google Scholar
  39. Khoo, S. T. (2001). Assessing program effects in the presence of treatment-baseline interactions: A latent curve approach. Psychological Methods, 6, 234–257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Komro, K. A., Perry, C. L., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Farbakhsh, K., Toomey, T. L., Stigler, M. H., et al. (2008). Outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of a multi-component alcohol use preventive intervention for urban youth: Project Northland Chicago. Addiction, 103, 606–618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877–883.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kulis, S., Nieri, T., Yabiku, S., Stromwall, L. K., & Marsiglia, F. F. (2007). Promoting reduced and discontinued substance use among adolescent substance users: Effectiveness of a universal prevention program. Prevention Science, 8, 35–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kulis, S., Yabiku, S. T., Marsiglia, F. F., Nieri, T., & Crossman, A. (2007). Differences by gender, ethnicity, and acculturation in the efficacy of the Keepin’ It Real model prevention program. Journal of Drug Education, 37, 123–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kumpfer, K. L., Smith, P., & Summerhays, J. F. (2008). A wakeup call to the prevention field: Are prevention programs for substance use effective for girls? Substance Use & Misuse, 43, 978–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leon, A. C., & Heo, M. (2009). Sample sizes required to detect interactions between two binary fixed-effects in a mixed-effects linear regression model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53, 603–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Longshore, D., Ellickson, P. L., McCaffrey, D. F., & St. Clair, P. A. (2007). School-based drug prevention among at-risk adolescents: Effects of ALERT plus. Health Education & Behavior, 34, 651–668.Google Scholar
  48. Mason, W. A., Kosterman, R., Haggerty, K. P., Hawkins, J. D., Redmond, C., Spoth, R. L., et al. (2009). Gender moderation and social developmental mediation of the effect of a family-focused substance use preventive intervention on young adult alcohol abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 599–605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Matthews, J. N. S., & Altman, D. G. (1996). Statistics notes: Interaction 2: Compare effect sizes not p values. British Medical Journal, 313, 808.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Nelson, D. E., Mowery, P., Tomar, S., Marcus, S., Giovino, G., & Zhao, L. (2006). Trends in smokeless tobacco use among adults and adolescents in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 897–905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Olds, D. L., Eckenrode, J., Henderson, C. R., Jr., Kitzman, H., Powers, J., Cole, R., et al. (1997). Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect. Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 637–643.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pentz, M. A., Dwyer, J. H., MacKinnon, D. P., Flay, B. R., Hansen, W. B., Wang, E. Y. I., et al. (1989). A multi-community trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse: Effects on drug use prevalence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 261, 3259–3266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pentz, M. A., Jasuja, G. K., Rohrbach, L. A., Sussman, S., & Bardo, M. T. (2006). Translation in tobacco and drug abuse prevention research. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 29, 246–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Perry, C. L., Williams, C. L., Komro, K. A., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Stigler, M. H., Munson, K. A., et al. (2002). Project Northland: Long-term outcomes of community action to reduce adolescent alcohol use. Health Education Research, 17, 117–132.Google Scholar
  56. Perry, C. L., Williams, C. L., Veblen Mortenson, S., Toomey, T. L., Komro, K. A., Anstine, P. S., et al. (1996). Project Northland: Outcomes of a community-wide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 956–965.Google Scholar
  57. Quinby, R. K., Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Brooke-Weiss, B., Arthur, M. W., & Hawkins, J. D. (2008). Installing the Communities That Care prevention system: Implementation progress and fidelity in a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. T., Jr. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
  60. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rohrbach, L. A., Grana, R., Sussman, S., & Valente, T. W. (2006). Type II translation: Transporting prevention interventions from research to real-world settings. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 29, 302–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schafer, J. L. (2000). NORM for Windows 95/98/NT (Version 2.03). University Park: Center for the Study and Prevention through Innovative Methodology at Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  64. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sloboda, Z., Stephens, R. C., Stephens, P. C., Grey, S. F., Teasdale, B., Hawthorne, R. D., et al. (2009). The Adolescent Substance Abuse Prevention Study: A randomized field trial of a universal substance abuse prevention program. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 102, 1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Snyder, H. N. (2008). Juvenile arrests 2006. Retrieved October 5, 2009, 2009, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/221338.pdf.
  67. Social Development Research Group. (2005–2007). Community Youth Development Study, Youth Development Survey [Grades 5–7]. Seattle: Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  68. Spoth, R., Shin, C., Guyll, M., Redmond, C., & Azevedo, K. (2006). Universality of effects: An examination of the comparability of long-term family intervention effects on substance use across risk-related subgroups. Prevention Science, 7, 209–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Clair, S., & Feinberg, M. (2007). Substance use outcomes at 18 months past baseline: The PROSPER community-university partnership trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, 395–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Steffensmeier, D., Schwartz, J., Zhong, H., & Ackerman, J. (2005). An assessment of recent trends in girls’ violence using diverse longitudinal sources: Is the gender gap closing? Criminology, 43, 355–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stoolmiller, M., Eddy, J., & Reid, J. B. (2000). Detecting and describing preventive intervention effects in a universal school-based randomized trial targeting delinquent and violent behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 296–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2005). Communities That Care prevention strategies guide. Retrieved March 7, 2006, from http://ncadi.samhsa.gov/features/ctc/resources.aspx.
  73. Tolan, P., Gorman-Smith, D., & Henry, D. (2004). Supporting families in a high-risk setting: Proximal effects of the SAFEChildren preventive intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 855–869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Van Horn, M. L., Fagan, A. A., Jaki, T., Brown, E. C., Hawkins, J. D., Arthur, M. W., et al. (2008). Using multilevel mixtures to evaluate intervention effects in group randomized trials. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43, 289–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wagenaar, A. C., Gehan, J. P., Jones-Webb, R., Toomey, T. L., Forster, J. L., Wolfson, M., et al. (1999). Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol: Lessons and results from a 15-community randomized trial. Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Woolf, S. H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. Journal of American Medical Association, 299, 211–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yin, R. K., & Ware, A. J. (2000). Using outcome data to evaluate community drug prevention initiatives: Pushing the state-of-the-art. Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zahn, M. A., Hawkins, S. R., Chiancone, J., & Whitworth, A. (2008). Girls study group: Charting the way to delinquency prevention for girls. Retrieved October 5, 2009, 2009, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/223434.pdf.

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabrina Oesterle
    • 1
  • J. David Hawkins
    • 1
  • Abigail A. Fagan
    • 2
  • Robert D. Abbott
    • 3
  • Richard F. Catalano
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Development Research GroupUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.College of EducationUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations