Prevention Science

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 371–383 | Cite as

A Brief Motivational Intervention for Physically Aggressive Dating Couples

Article

Abstract

Motivational interviewing is a brief non-confrontational intervention designed to enhance motivation to reduce harmful behavior (Miller and Rollnick 2002). The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of motivational interviewing as a targeted prevention approach for partner aggression in emerging adulthood. Participants were 50 college dating couples between 18 and 25 years old who reported at least one act of male-to-female physical aggression in their current relationships. After completing a 2-hour assessment session, half of all couples were randomly assigned to a 2-hour individualized motivational feedback session targeting physical aggression and risk factors for aggression. The remaining couples received minimal, non-motivational feedback. Follow-up surveys were conducted 3, 6, and 9 months later. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses indicated that, compared to the control condition, the motivational feedback intervention led to reductions in physical aggression and harmful alcohol use and to less acceptance of female psychological aggression and male psychological aggression (among women only). Lagged analyses indicated that changes in physical aggression were predicted by reductions in psychological aggression and by lower acceptance of both male and female psychological aggression. Reductions in physical aggression predicted lower anxiety and greater relationship investment and male relationship commitment over time. These findings suggest that a brief motivational intervention is a useful prevention approach for high-risk dating couples, with benefits to both individual and relationship functioning.

Keywords

Targeted prevention Partner aggression Motivational interviewing Emerging adulthood Hierarchical linear modeling 

References

  1. Arias, I., & Johnson, P. (1989). Evaluations of physical aggression among intimate dyads. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 298–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkins, D. (2005). Using multilevel models to analyze couple and family treatment data: Basic and advanced issues. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 98–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory—Second Edition (BDI-II), Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carey, K. B., Carey, M. P., Maisto, S. A., & Henson, J. M. (2006). Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 943–954.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, S., & O’Leary, K. D. (2002). Development and validation of the Fear of Partner Scale: A screening measure for conjoint therapy. Reno, NV: Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy.Google Scholar
  11. Cordova, J. V., Scott, R. L., Dorian, M., Mirgain, S., Yaeger, D., & Groot, A. (2005). The Marriage Checkup: An indicated preventive intervention for treatment-avoidant couples at risk for marital deterioration. Behavior Therapy, 36, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foran, H. M., & O’Leary, K. D. (2008). Alcohol and intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1222–1234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Foshee, V., McNaughton Reyes, H., & Wyckoff, S. (2009). Approaches to preventing psychological, physical, and sexual partner abuse. Psychological and physical aggression in couples: Causes and interventions (pp. 165–189). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  14. Grissom, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of variance in clinical data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 155–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Heyman, R. E., & Schlee, K. A. (1997). Toward a better estimate of the prevalence of partner abuse: Adjusting rates based on the sensitivity of the Conflict Tactics Scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 332–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Institute of Medicine. (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lawrence, E., & Bradbury, T. N. (2007). Trajectories of change in physical aggression and marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 236–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Litt, M. D., Kadden, R. M., Kabela-Cormier, E., & Petry, N. M. (2008). Coping skills training and contingency management treatments for marijuana dependence: Exploring mechanisms of behavior change. Addiction, 103, 638–648.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Magdol, L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Newman, D. L., Fagan, J., & Silva, P. A. (1997). Gender differences in partner violence in a birth cohort of 21-year-olds: Bridging the gap between clinical and epidemiological approaches. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 65, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marlatt, G. A., Baer, J. S., Kivlahan, D. R., Dimeff, L. A., Larimer, M. E., Quigley, L. A., et al. (1998). Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: Results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 66, 604–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller, W. R. (1983). Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 11, 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, W. R., Sovereign, R. G., & Krege, B. (1988). Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers: II. The Drinker’s Check-up as a preventive intervention. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 16, 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Monti, P. M., Barnett, N. P., Colby, S. M., Gwaltney, C. J., Spirito, A., Rohsenow, D. J., et al. (2007). Motivational interviewing versus feedback only in emergency care for young adult problem drinking. Addiction, 102, 1234–1243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Moyer, A., Finney, J. W., Swearingen, C. E., & Vergun, P. (2002). Brief interventions for alcohol problems: A meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. Addiction, 97, 279–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moyers, T., Martin, T., Catley, D., Harris, K. J., & Ahluwalia, J. S. (2003a). Assessing the integrity of motivational interviewing interventions: Reliability of the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 31, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moyers, T. B., Martin, T., Manuel, J. K., & Miller, W. R. (2003b). The Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code: Version 2.0. Available on the World Wide Web at: motivationalinterviewing.org.Google Scholar
  28. Moyers, T. B., Miller, W. R., & Hendrickson, S. M. L. (2005). How does motivational interviewing work? Therapist interpersonal skill predicts client involvement within motivational interviewing sessions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 590–598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2003). Costs of Intimate Partner Violence against Women in the United States. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  30. O’Leary, K. D. (1999). Developmental and affective issues in assessing and treating partner aggression. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 400–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Leary, K. D., & Slep, A. M. S. (2003). A dyadic longitudinal model of adolescent dating aggression. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 314–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Leary, K. D., & Woodin, E. M. (2005). Partner aggression and problem drinking across the lifespan: How much do they decline? Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 877–894.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Leary, K. D., Woodin, E. M., & Fritz, P. T. (2006). Can we prevent the hitting? Implications for the prevention of partner violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 13, 125–181.Google Scholar
  34. Raudenbush, S., Brennan, R., & Barnett, R. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., & Congdon, R. (2006). HLM6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Puente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Screening Test (AUDIT). WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Schumacher, J. A., & Slep, A. M. S. (2004). Attitudes and dating aggression: A cognitive dissonance approach. Prevention Science, 5, 231–243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Slep, A., Cascardi, M., Avery-Leaf, S., & O’Leary, K. (2001). Two new measures of attitudes about the acceptability of teen dating aggression. Psychological Assessment, 13, 306–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 38, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., Middleton, K. A., Busch, A. L., Lundeberg, K., & Carlton, R. P. (2000). The intergenerational transmission of spouse abuse: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 62, 640–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taft, C. T., Vogt, D. S., Mechanic, M. B., & Resick, P. A. (2007). Posttraumatic stress disorder and physical health symptoms among women seeking help for relationship aggression. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 354–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilson, D. B., Gottfredson, D. C., & Najaka, S. S. (2001). School-based prevention of problem behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17, 247–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007). School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: Update of a meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, s130–s143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodin, E. M., & O’Leary, K. D. (2006). Partner aggression severity as a risk-marker for male and female violence recidivism. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32, 283–296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations