Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 331–342 | Cite as

Positive and Negative Reinforcement Underlying Risk Behavior in Early Adolescents

  • Laura MacPhersonEmail author
  • Elizabeth K. Reynolds
  • Stacey B. Daughters
  • Frances Wang
  • Jude Cassidy
  • Linda C. Mayes
  • C. W. Lejuez
Article

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to examine the combined influence of positive reinforcement processes using a behavioral task measuring risk taking propensity (RTP) and negative reinforcement processes using a behavioral task measuring deficits in distress tolerance (DT) on a range of risk taking behaviors among early adolescents. Participants included a community sample of 230 early adolescents (aged 9–13) who completed two behavioral tasks assessing reinforcement processes as well as reported on past year risk behavior involvement as assessed by items from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System at a baseline and a 1-year follow-up assessment. Data indicated that at the Wave 2 assessment, RTP was positively related to number of risk-taking behaviors in the past year but only for those with low DT, with this finding persisting after controlling for the significant influence of male gender and higher sensation seeking. Results of the present study highlight the importance of considering both positive and negative reinforcement processes in combination when investigating vulnerability factors for early risk behavior engagement in youth.

Keywords

Adolescents Risk taking Reinforcement processes 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Aklin, W. M., Lejuez, C. W., Zvolensky, M. J., Kahler, C. W., & Gwadz, M. (2005). Evaluation of behavioral measures of risk taking propensity with inner city adolescents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 215–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, T. B., Piper, M. E., McCarthy, D. E., Majeskie, M. R., & Fiore, M. C. (2004). Addiction motivation reformulated: An affective processing model of negative reinforcement. Psychological Review, 111, 33–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandon, T., Herzog, T., Juliano, L., Lazev, A., Simmons, V., & Irvin, J. (2003). Pretreatment task persistence predicts smoking cessation outcome. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 448–456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brook, J., Adams, R., & Balka, E. (2004). Illicit drug use and risky sexual behavior among African American and Puerto Rican urban adolescents: The longitudinal links. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 165, 203–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, R., Lejuez, C., Kahler, C., & Strong, D. (2002). Distress tolerance and duration of past smoking cessation attempts. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 180–185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrnes, J., Miller, D., & Schafer, W. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 51, 1–64.Google Scholar
  9. Colman, I., Wadsworth, M. E., Croudace, T. J., & Jones, P. B. (2007). Forty-year psychiatric outcomes following assessment for internalizing disorder in adolescence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 126–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Conrod, P. J., Stewart, S. H., Pihl, R. O., Cote, S., Fontaine, V., & Dongier, M. (2000). Efficacy of brief coping skills interventions that match different personality profiles of female substance abusers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 231–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Conrod, P. J., Stewart, S. H., Comeau, N., & Maclean, A. M. (2006). Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral interventions targeting personality risk factors for youth alcohol misuse. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 550–563.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Conrod, P. J., Castellanos, N., & Mackie, C. (2008). Personality-targeted interventions delay the growth of adolescent drinking and binge drinking. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 181–190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, M. L., Agocha, V. B., & Sheldon, M. S. (2000). A motivational perspective on risky behaviors: The role of personality and affect regulatory processes. Journal of Personality, 68, 1059–1088.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, M. L., Wood, P. K., Orcutt, H. K., & Albino, A. (2003). Personality and the predisposition to engage in risky or problem behaviors during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 390–410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Daughters, S. B., Lejuez, C. W., Bornovalova, M. A., Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2005a). Distress tolerance as a predictor of early treatment dropout in a residential substance abuse treatment facility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 729–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daughters, S., Lejuez, C., Kahler, C., Brown, R., & Strong, D. (2005b). Psychological distress tolerance and duration of most recent abstinence attempt among residential treatment-seeking substance abusers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daughters, S., Sargeant, M., Bornovalova, M., Lejuez, C., & Gratz, K. (2008). The relationship between distress tolerance and antisocial personality disorder among male inner-city treatment seeking substance users. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 509–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Daughters, S., Reynolds, E., MacPherson, L., Kahler, C. W., Danielson, C. K., Zvolensky, M., et al. (2009). Negative reinforcement and early adolescent externalizing and internalizing symptoms: The moderating role of gender and ethnicity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 198–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. DiClemente, R. J., Hansen, W., & Ponton, L. E. (1996). Adolescents at risk: A generation in jeopardy. In R. DiClemente, W. Hansen, & L. Ponton (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  20. Eysenck, S., Pearson, P., Easting, G., & Allsopp, J. (1985). Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 613–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fossati, A., Barratt, E., Acquarini, E., & DiCeglie, A. (2002). Psychometric properties of an adolescent version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 for a sample of Italian high school students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 621–635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fowles, D. C. (1980). The three-arousal model: Implications of Gray’s two-factor learning theory for heart-rate, electrodermal activity, and psycopathy. Psychophysiology, 17, 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ganzel, A. (1999). Adolescent decision making: The influence of mood, age, and gender on the consideration of information. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 289–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holmbeck, G. N. (2002). Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27, 87–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoyle, R. H., Stephenson, M. T., Palmgreen, P., Pugzles Lorch, E., & Donohew, R. L. (2002). Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirby, K., & Maraković, N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 100–104.Google Scholar
  27. Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S., et al. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11, 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leigh, B. C. (1999). Peril, chance, and adventure: Concepts of risk, alcohol use and risky behavior in young adults. Addiction, 94, 371–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., et al. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lejuez, C. W., Kahler, C. W., & Brown, R. A. (2003). A modified computer version of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) as a laboratory-based stressor. the Behavior Therapist, 26, 290–293.Google Scholar
  31. Lejuez, C., Aklin, W., Bornovalova, M., & Moolchan, E. (2005). Differences in risk-taking propensity across inner-city adolescent ever- and never-smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 7, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lejuez, C. W., Daughters, S. B., Danielson, C. W., & Ruggiero, K. (2006). The behavioral indicator of resiliency to distress (BIRD). Unpublished manual.Google Scholar
  33. Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W., Daughters, S., Zvolensky, M., Kahler, C., & Gwadz, M. (2007). Reliability and validity of the Youth Version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART-Y) in the assessment of risk-taking behavior among inner-city adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 106–111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lejuez, C. W., Hopko, D. R., Acierno, R., Daughters, S. B., & Pagoto, S. L. (in press). Ten year revision of the brief Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression (BATD): Revised Treatment Manual (BATD-R). Behavior Modification.Google Scholar
  35. MacPherson, L., Tull, M. T., Matusiewicz, A., Rodman, S., Strong, D. R., Kahler, C. W., et al. (2010). Randomized controlled trial of behavioral activation smoking cessation treatment for smokers with elevated depressive symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 55–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Moffit, T. E., Caspi, A., Harrington, H., & Milne, B. J. (2002). Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Monterosso, J., Ehrman, R., Napier, K. L., O'Brien, C. P., & Childress, A. R. (2001). Three decision-making tasks in cocaine-dependent patients: Do they measure the same construct? Addiction, 96, 1825–1837.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K. L., Seybolt, D., Morrisey-Kane, E., et al. (2003). What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58, 449–456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Patrick, C., Curtin, J., & Tellegen, A. (2002). Development and validation of a brief form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 14, 150–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Patton, J., Stanford, M., & Barratt, E. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768–774.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Quinn, E., Brandon, T., & Copeland, A. (1996). Is task persistence related to smoking and substance abuse? The application of learned industriousness theory to addictive behaviors. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 4, 186–190. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.4.2.186. Retrieved August 10, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reynolds, B., & Schiffbauer, R. (2004). Measuring state changes in human delay discounting: An experiential discounting task. Behavioural Processes, 67, 343–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith-Khuri, E., Iachan, R., Scheidt, P. C., Overpeck, M. D., Gabhainn, S. N., Pickett, W., et al. (2004). A cross-national study of violence-related behaviors in adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158, 539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Solomon, R., & Corbit, J. (1974). An opponent-process theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychological Review, 81, 119–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sourander, A., Jensen, P., Davies, M., Elonheimo, H., Helenius, H., Piha, J., et al. (2007). Who is at greatest risk for adverse long-term outcomes? The Finnish From a Boy to a Man study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 1148–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Steinberg, L., Dahl, R., Keating, D., Kupfer, D. J., Masten, A. S., & Pine, D. S. (2006). The study of developmental psychopathology in adolescence: Integrating affective neuroscience with the study of context. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology, Vol 2: Developmental neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 710–741). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Stephenson, M. T., Hoyle, R. H., Palmgreen, P., & Slater, M. D. (2003). Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 72, 279–286.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wikler, A. (1965). Conditioning factors in opiate addictions and relapse. In D. M. Wilner & G. G. Kassebaum (Eds.), Narcotics (pp. 85–100). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  51. Windle, M., Spear, L. P., Fuligni, A. J., Angold, A., Brown, J. D., Pine, D., et al. (2008). Transitions into underage and problem drinking: Developmental processes and mechanisms between 10 and 15 years of age. Pediatrics, 121, S273–S289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Zuckerman, M. (1983). A biological theory of sensation seeking. In M. Zuckerman (Ed.), Biological bases of sensation: seeking, impulsivity, and anxiety. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura MacPherson
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Elizabeth K. Reynolds
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stacey B. Daughters
    • 3
  • Frances Wang
    • 2
  • Jude Cassidy
    • 1
  • Linda C. Mayes
    • 4
  • C. W. Lejuez
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Center for Addictions, Personality, and Emotion ResearchUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Center for Addictions, Personality, and Emotion ResearchUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.School of Public HealthUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  4. 4.Yale Child Study Center and Yale Medical SchoolNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations