Prevention Science

, 10:100 | Cite as

Altering School Climate through School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Findings from a Group-Randomized Effectiveness Trial

  • Catherine P. Bradshaw
  • Christine W. Koth
  • Leslie A. Thornton
  • Philip J. Leaf
Article

Abstract

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a universal, school-wide prevention strategy that is currently implemented in over 7,500 schools to reduce disruptive behavior problems. The present study examines the impact of PBIS on staff reports of school organizational health using data from a group-randomized controlled effectiveness trial of PBIS conducted in 37 elementary schools. Longitudinal multilevel analyses on data from 2,596 staff revealed a significant effect of PBIS on the schools’ overall organizational health, resource influence, staff affiliation, and academic emphasis over the 5-year trial; the effects on collegial leadership and institutional integrity were significant when implementation fidelity was included in the model. Trained schools that adopted PBIS the fastest tended to have higher levels of organizational health at baseline, but the later-implementing schools tended to experience the greatest improvements in organizational health after implementing PBIS. This study indicated that changes in school organizational health are important consequences of the PBIS whole-school prevention model, and may in turn be a potential contextual mediator of the effect of PBIS on student performance.

Keywords

School Climate Organization Fidelity Positive behavioral interventions and support 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support for this project comes from grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R49/CCR318627, 1U49CE000728, K01CE001333-01) and the National Institute of Mental Health (1R01MH67948-1A and T32 MH19545-11). The authors are particularly grateful to Susan Barrett and Jerry Bloom of the Sheppard Pratt Health System, Milton McKenna and Andrea Alexander of the Maryland State Department of Education, and the other members of the PBIS Maryland State Leadership for their support of this project.

References

  1. Aarons, G. A., & Sawitzy, A. C. (2006). Organizational culture and climate and mental health provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychological Services, 3, 61–72. doi: 10.1037/1541-1559.3.1.61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, S., Bradshaw, C. P., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2008). Maryland state-wide PBIS initiative: Systems, evaluation, and next steps. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 105–114. doi: 10.1177/1098300707312541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battistich, V., Schaps, E., Watson, E., & Solomon, D. (1996). Prevention effects of the Child Development Project: Early findings from an ongoing multisite demonstration trial. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, 12–35. doi: 10.1177/0743554896111003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bevans, K. B., Bradshaw, C. P., Miech, R., & Leaf, P. J. (2007). Staff- and school-level predictors of school organizational health: A multilevel analysis. The Journal of School Health, 77, 294–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00210.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradshaw, C. P., Koth, C. W., Bevans, K. B., Ialongo, N., & Leaf, P. J. (2008a). The impact of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly. in press.Google Scholar
  6. Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2008b). Examining the effects of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. in press.Google Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, C. P., Reinke, W. M., Brown, L. D., Bevans, K. B., & Leaf, P. J. (2008). Implementation of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in elementary schools: Observations from a randomized trial. Education & Treatment of Children, 31, 1–26. doi: 10.1353/etc.0.0025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–45. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00043-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Domitrovich, C. E., Bradshaw, C. P., Poduska, J., Hoagwood, K., Buckley, J., Olin, S., et al. (2008). Maximizing the implementation quality of evidence-based preventive interventions in schools: A conceptual framework. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion: Training and Practice. Research Policy, 1, 6–28.Google Scholar
  10. Durlak, J. A., & Dupree, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237–256. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blasé, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network (FMHI #231).Google Scholar
  13. Glisson, C. (2002). The organizational context of children’s mental health services. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 233–252. doi: 10.1023/A:1020972906177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glisson, C., & Hemmelgarn, A. (1998). The effects of organization climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children’s service systems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 401–421. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00005-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottfredson, D. C. (1986). An empirical test of school-based environmental and individual interventions to reduce the risk of delinquent behavior. Criminology, 24, 705–731. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb01508.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gottfredson, D. C. (1987). An evaluation of an organization development approach to reducing school disorder. Evaluation Review, 11, 739–763. doi: 10.1177/0193841X8701100603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gottfredson, D. C., & Gottfredson, G. D. (2002). Quality of school-based prevention programs: Results from a national survey. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gottfredson, D. C., Gottfredson, G. D., & Hybl, L. G. (1993). Managing adolescent behavior: A multiyear, multischool study. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 179–215.Google Scholar
  19. Gottfredson, G. D., Gottfredson, D. C., Payne, A. A., & Gottfredson, N. C. (2005). School climate predictors of school disorder: Results from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 412–444. doi: 10.1177/0022427804271931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gottfredson, G. D., Jones, E. M., & Gore, T. W. (2002). Implementation and evaluation of a cognitive-behavioral intervention to prevent problem behavior in a disorganized school. Prevention Science, 3, 27–38. doi: 10.1023/A:1014671310038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hedges, L. V. (2007). Effect sizes in cluster-randomized designs. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32, 341–370. doi: 10.3102/1076998606298043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hemmelgarn, A. L., Glisson, G., & James, L. R. (2006). Organizational culture and climate: Implications for services and interventions research. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13, 73–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00008.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill, L. G., Maucione, K., & Hood, B. K. (2007). A focused approach to assessing program fidelity. Prevention Science, 8, 25–34. doi: 10.1007/s11121-006-0051-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hohmann, A. A., & Shear, M. K. (2002). Community-based intervention research: Coping with the “noise” of real life in study design. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 201–207. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Eber, L., Nakasato, J., Todd, A. W., et al. (2008). Randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide Positive Behavior Support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. in press.Google Scholar
  26. Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Todd, A. W., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support. In L. Bambara & L. Kern (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 359–390). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  27. Horner, R., Todd, A., Lewis-Palmer, T., Irvin, L. K., Sugai, G., & Boland, J. (2004). The School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET): A research instrument for assessing school-wide positive behavior supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 3–12. doi: 10.1177/10983007040060010201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoy, W., & Feldman, J. (1987). Organizational health: The concept and its measure. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20, 30–38.Google Scholar
  29. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1996). Education administration: Theory, research, and practice (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (1997). The road to open and healthy schools: A handbook for change, Elementary Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  31. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open schools/healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Jo, B. (2002). Statistical power in randomized intervention studies with noncompliance. Psychological Methods, 7, 178–193. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211–236. doi: 10.1177/109442810033001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knoff, H. M. (2000). Organizational development and strategic planning for the millennium: A blueprint toward effective school discipline, school safety, and crisis prevention. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 17–32 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(200001)37:1<17::AID-PITS3>3.0.CO;2-K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koth, C. W., Bradshaw, C. P., & Leaf, P. J. (2008). Examining the relationship between classroom-level factors and students’ perception of school climate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 96–104. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewis, T. J., & Sugai, G. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive school-wide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31, 1–24.Google Scholar
  37. Lindsley, O. R. (1992). Why aren’t effective teaching tools widely adopted? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 21–26. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lochman, J. E. (2003). Commentary: School contextual influences on the dissemination of interventions. School Psychology Review, 32, 174–177.Google Scholar
  39. Luke, D. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Mrazek, P. J., & Haggerty, R. J. (Eds.). (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. The American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 315–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). The development of heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems from ages 18 to 37 in a U.S. national sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 290–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.Google Scholar
  44. Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  45. Olweus, D., Limber, S. P., Flerx, V. C., Mullin, N., Riese, J., & Snyder, M. (2007). Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: Schoolwide guide. Center City, MN: Hazelden.Google Scholar
  46. Payne, A. A., Gottfredson, D. C., & Gottfredson, G. D. (2006). School predictors of the intensity of implementation of school-based prevention programs. Prevention Science, 7, 225–237. doi: 10.1007/s11121-006-0029-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Rosenberg, M. S., & Jackman, L. A. (2003). Development, implementation and sustainability of comprehensive school-wide behavior management systems. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 10–21. doi: 10.1177/10534512030390010201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schoenwald, S. K., & Hoagwood, K. (2001). Effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of interventions: What matters when? Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.), 52, 1190–1197. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.9.1190.Google Scholar
  50. Sprague, J. (2008 May). Positive Behavior Support implementation in Norway. Paper presented at the Society for Prevention Research, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  51. Stuart, E., & Leaf, P. (2007 May). Moving from efficacy to effectiveness in school-based prevention research: Case study of PBIS. Poster presented at the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  52. Sugai, G. (2008 July). Update on PBIS. Paper presented at the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Director’s Meeting, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  53. Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–259.Google Scholar
  54. Sugai, G., Lewis-Palmer, T., Todd, A., & Horner, R. H. (2001). School-Wide Evaluation Tool. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
  55. Sugai, G., Sprague, J. R., Horner, R. H., & Walker, H. M. (2000). Preventing school violence: The use of office discipline referrals to assess and monitor school-wide discipline interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 94–101. doi: 10.1177/106342660000800205s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Taylor-Greene, S., Brown, D., Nelson, L., Longton, J., Gassman, T., Cohen, J., et al. (1997). School-wide behavioral support: Starting the year off right. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 99–112. doi: 10.1023/A:1022849722465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine P. Bradshaw
    • 1
  • Christine W. Koth
    • 1
  • Leslie A. Thornton
    • 1
  • Philip J. Leaf
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Center for the Prevention of Youth ViolenceJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations