Prevention Science

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 4–16 | Cite as

Historical Change in the Link between Adolescent Deviance Proneness and Marijuana Use, 1979–2004

  • Michelle Little
  • Scott R. Weaver
  • Kevin M. King
  • Freda Liu
  • Laurie Chassin
Article

Abstract

We examined historical change in the association between adolescent deviance proneness and marijuana use using 26 years (from 1979 through 2004) of national 12th grade data from the Monitoring the Future (MTF) study. “Deviance proneness” was measured using a latent factor model of behavioral and personality characteristics that underlie both substance use and antisocial disorders. Marijuana use was measured both in terms of annual frequency of use and degree of involvement with marijuana. Separate within-gender structural equation models were used to determine whether links between deviance proneness and marijuana use were consistently significant and invariant in magnitude across 13 two-year historical cohorts. Overall results affirmed the established association between adolescent deviance proneness and both the frequency of marijuana use as well as regular use. Among male youth, the size of the association between deviance proneness and marijuana use was significantly smaller at the cohort of lowest population prevalence (1991/92) compared to cohorts marking peaks in marijuana use prevalence, thus suggesting a “softening” historical trend. By contrast, the prediction of female marijuana use from deviance proneness was not consistently related to historical shifts in population prevalence of marijuana use. Study findings point to the utility of risk-focused prevention programming that targets early precursors of both antisocial and substance use disorders.

Keywords

Adolescent marijuana use Historical change Deviance proneness Antisocial behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is a modified version of a paper presented at the inaugural Sloboda-Bukoski Society for Prevention Research Cup Competition as part of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research in San Antonio, Texas (May 31–June 2, 2006). This research was supported by an NIMH Training Grant (T32 MH 018387). We would like to acknowledge the work of Mark Eddy and Charles Martinez in organizing the competition. We would also like to thank Jenn-Yun Tein, Roger Millsap and Irwin Sandler for their helpful advice on data analysis and presentation.

References

  1. Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M. (1998). Explaining recent increases in students’ marijuana use: Impacts of perceived risks and disapproval, 1976 through 1996. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 887–892.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (1986). Change and consistency in the correlates of drug use among high school seniors: 1975–1986 (Monitoring the Future occasional paper No. 21). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  3. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Oxford, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbery, L., Botvin, E. M., & Diaz, T. (1995). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1106–1112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brook, J. S., Brook, D. W., Arencibia-Mireles, O., Richter, L., & Whiteman, M. (2001). Risk factors for adolescent marijuana use across cultures and across time. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 357–374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brook, J. S., Whiteman, M., Balka, E. B., Win, P. T., & Gursen, M. D. (1998). Similar and different precursors to drug use and delinquency among African Americans and Puerto Ricans. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159, 13–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brook, J. S., Whiteman, M., Finch, S., & Cohen, P. (2000). Longitudinally foretelling drug use in the late twenties: Adolescent personality and social-environmental antecedents. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 161, 37–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, T. N., Schulenberg, J., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2001). Are risk and protective factors for substance use consistent across historical time?: National data from the high school classes of 1976 through 1997. Prevention Science, 2, 29–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., Morgan-Lopez, A., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). Deviance proneness and adolescent smoking 1980 vs. 2001: Has there been a hardening of adolescent smoking? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 264–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conduct Problems Preventive Research Group (2004). The effects of the Fast Track program on serious problem outcomes at the end of elementary school. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 650–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (2007). Fast Track randomized controlled trial to prevent externalizing psychiatric disorders: Findings from grades 3 to 9. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 1250–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Derzon, J. H., & Lipsey, M. W. (1999). A synthesis of the relationship of marijuana use with delinquent and problem behaviors. School Psychology International. Special Issue: Preventing Marijuana Use Among Youth, 20, 7–68.Google Scholar
  14. Donovan, J. E., & Jessor, R. (1985). Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 890–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duan, N., Manning, W. G. Jr., Morris, C. N., & Newhouse, J. P. (1983). A comparison of alternative models for the demand of medical care. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ennett, S. T., Tobler, N. S., Ringwalt, C. L., & Flewelling, R. L. (1994). How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1394–1401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Ridder, E. M. (2005). Tests of causal linkages between cannabis use and psychotic symptoms. Addiction, 100, 354–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Swain-Campbell, N. (2002). Cannabis use and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence and young adulthood. Addiction, 97, 1123–1135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gfroerer, J., Wright, D., & Kopstein, A. (1997). Prevalence of youth substance use: Impact of methodological differences between two national surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 47, 19–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gottfredson, D. C., & Wilson, D. B. (2003). Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prevention Science, 4, 27–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison, L. (1997). The validity of self-reported drug use in survey research: An overview and critique of research methods. In L. Harrison & A. Hughes (Eds.), The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates (pp. 17–36). Rockville, MD: NIDA, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  23. Horvath, L. S., Milich, R., Lynam, D., Leukefeld, C., & Clayton, R. (2004). Sensation seeking and substance use: A cross-lagged panel design. Individual Differences Research, 2, 175–183.Google Scholar
  24. Irvin, J., Hendricks, P., & Brandon, T. (2003). The increasing recalcitrance of smokers in clinical trials II: Pharmacotherapy trials. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5, 27–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1996). National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future Study 1975–1995. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  26. Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. (2005). Monitoring the Future. National results on adolescent drug use. Overview of key findings. Bethesda, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  27. King, K. M., Meehan, B. T., Trim, R. S., & Chassin, L. (2006). Marker or mediator? The effects of adolescent substance use on young adult educational attainment. Addiction, 101, 1730–1740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krueger, R. F. (1999). Personality traits in late adolescence predict mental disorders in early adulthood: A prospective-epidemiological study. Journal of Personality, 67, 39–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krueger, R. F., Hicks, B. M., Patrick, C. J., Carlson, S. R., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2002). Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior and personality: Modeling the externalizing spectrum. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 411–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R., Smith, P., & Bellamy, N. (2002). Cultural sensitivity and adaptation in family-based prevention interventions. Prevention Science, 3, 241–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Library of Congress (2003). Marijuana availability in the United States and its associated territories. Washington, DC: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  32. Mason, W. A., & Windle, M. (2002). Reciprocal relations between adolescent substance use and delinquency: A longitudinal latent variable analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 63–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGee, L., & Newcomb, M. D. (1992). General deviance syndrome: Expanded hierarchical evaluations at four ages from early adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 766–776.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mrazek, P. J., & Haggerty, R. J. (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  36. Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2006). Mplus (Version 4.1) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA.: Author.Google Scholar
  37. National Institute on Drug Abuse (1997). Preventing drug use among children and adolescents: A research-based guide for parents, educators, and community leaders. Bethesda, Maryland: NIDA: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  38. National Research Council, & Institute of Medicine (2001). Race, crime and juvenile justice: The issue of racial disparity. In J. McCord, C. Spatz Widom, & N. A. Crowell (Eds.), Juvenile crime, juvenile justice (pp. 228–260). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pedersen, W., Mastekaasa, A., & Wichstrom, L. (2001). Conduct problems and early cannabis initiation: A longitudinal study of gender differences. Addiction, 96, 415–431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reid, M. J., Webster-Stratton, C., & Hammond, M. (2003). Follow-up of children who received the Incredible Years intervention for oppositional-defiant disorder: Maintenance and prediction of 2-year outcome. Behavior Therapy, 34, 71–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ringwalt, C. L., Ennett, S., Vincus, A., Thorne, J., Rohrbach, L. A., & Simons-Rudolph, A. (2002). The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools. Prevention Science, 3, 257–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ringwalt, C. L., & Greene, J. M. (1993). Results of school districts’ drug prevention coordinators’ survey. Paper presented at the Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs Conference on Evaluating School-linked Prevention Strategies, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  43. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scott, S. (2005). Do parenting programmes for severe child antisocial behaviour work over the longer term, and for whom? One year follow-up of a multi-centre controlled trial. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. Special Issue: A Festschrift for William Yule, 33, 403–421.Google Scholar
  45. Shedler, J., & Block, J. (1990). Adolescent drug use and psychological health: A longitudinal inquiry. American Psychologist, 45, 612–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spoth, R., Redmond, D., Trudeau, L., & Shin, C. (2002). Longitudinal substance initiation outcomes for a universal preventive intervention combining family and school programs. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 129–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spoth, R., Shin, C., Guyll, M., Redmond, C., & Azevedo, K. (2006). Universality of effects: An examination of the comparability of long-term family intervention effects on substance use across risk-related subgroups. Prevention Science, 7, 209–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Steinman, K. J. (2005). Drug selling among high school students: related risk behaviors and psychosocial characteristics. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 71.e71–71.e78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stephenson, M. T. (2003). Mass media strategies targeting high sensation seekers: What works and why. American Journal of Health Behavior. Special Issue: Selected Proceedings of the 3rd Scientific Meeting of the American Academy of Health Behavior, March 16–19,2003, St Augustine, FL, 27(Suppl3), S233–S238.Google Scholar
  50. Stice, E., Myers, M. G., & Brown, S. A. (1998). Relations of delinquency to adolescent substance use and problem use: A prospective study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 12, 136–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Swaim, R. C., Beauvais, F., Chavez, E. L., & Oetting, E. R. (1997). The effect of school drop-out rates on estimates of adolescent substance abuse among three racial/ethnic groups. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 51–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D. G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. Journal of Primary Prevention, 20, 275–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tucker, J. S., Ellickson, P. L., Collins, R. L., & Klein, D. J. (2006). Are drug experimenters better adjusted than abstainers and users?: A longitudinal study of adolescent marijuana use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 488–494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. US Department of Education. (2001). Safe, disciplined and drug-free schools. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Research and Improvement, Office of Reform Assistance and Dissemination.Google Scholar
  55. Wallace, J. M. Jr., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., Cooper, S. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2003). Gender and ethnic differences in smoking, drinking and illicit drug use among American 8th, 10th and 12th grade students, 1976–2000. Addiction, 98, 225–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. White, H. R., & Labouvie, E. W. (1994). Generality versus specificity of problem behavior: psychological and functional differences. Journal of Drug Issues. Special Issue: Drugs and crime revisited, 24(1–2), 55–74.Google Scholar
  57. White, H. R., Labouvie, E. W., & Bates, M. E. (1994). The relationship between sensation seeking and delinquency: A longitudinal analysis. In D. P. Farrington (Ed.), Psychological explanations of crime (pp. 107–121). Brookfield, VT, USA: Dartmouth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  58. Windle, M. (1990). A longitudinal study of antisocial behaviors in early adolescence as predictors of late adolescent substance use: Gender and ethnic group differences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 86–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Robust mean and covariance structure analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 63–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle Little
    • 1
  • Scott R. Weaver
    • 2
  • Kevin M. King
    • 3
  • Freda Liu
    • 1
  • Laurie Chassin
    • 1
  1. 1.Prevention Research CenterArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations