Prevention Science

, 9:99 | Cite as

The Study of Mentoring in the Learning Environment (SMILE): A Randomized Evaluation of the Effectiveness of School-based Mentoring

Article

Abstract

The effect of providing youth school-based mentoring (SBM), in addition to other school-based support services, was examined with a sample of 516 predominately Latino students across 19 schools. Participants in a multi-component, school-based intervention program run by a youth development agency were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: (1) supportive services alone or (2) supportive services plus SBM. Compared to community-based mentoring, the duration of the SBM was brief (averaging eight meetings), partly because the agency experienced barriers to retaining mentors. Intent-to-treat (ITT) main effects of SBM were tested using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) and revealed small, positive main effects of mentoring on self-reported connectedness to peers, self-esteem (global and present-oriented), and social support from friends, but not on several other measures, including grades and social skills. Three-way cross-level interactions of sex and school level (elementary, middle, and high school) revealed that elementary school boys and high school girls benefited the most from mentoring. Among elementary school boys, those in the mentoring condition reported higher social skills (empathy and cooperation), hopefulness, and connectedness both to school and to culturally different peers. Among high school girls, those mentored reported greater connectedness to culturally different peers, self-esteem, and support from friends. Findings suggest no or iatrogenic effects of mentoring for older boys and younger girls. Therefore, practitioners coordinating multi-component programs that include SBM would be wise to provide mentors to the youth most likely to benefit from SBM and bolster program practices that help to support and retain mentors.

Keywords

Mentoring School Connectedness Social skills Self-esteem Multilevel modeling 

References

  1. AOL Time Warner Foundation (2002). Mentoring in America. New York: AOL Time Warner Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, D., & Maguire, C. (2005). Mentoring in historical perspective. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.) Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 14–29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Battistich, V., Schaps, E., & Wilson, N. (2004). Effects of an elementary school intervention on students’ “connectedness” to school and social adjustment during middle school. Journal of Primary Prevention, 24, 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boggan, D. (2005, June 15). Lunch Keynote. Youthfriends’ Second National School-based Mentoring Conference, Kansas City, Missouri.Google Scholar
  5. Bogat, G. A., & Liang, L. (2005). Gender and mentoring relationships. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.) Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 205–218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bramlett, R. K., Dielmann, K. B., & Smithson, M. (1999). Screening for behavior problems in preschool: A comparison of the social skills rating system (SSRS) and a structured teacher interview. Research in the Schools, 6, 47–52.Google Scholar
  7. Cavell, T., & Smith, A. M. (2005). Mentoring children. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.) Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 160–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Conners, C. K., Sitarenios, G., Parker, J. D. A., & Epstein, J. N. (1998). The revised Conners’ Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): Factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 257–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darling, N. (2005). Mentoring adolescents. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.) Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 177–190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. DuBois, D. L., & Karcher, M. J. (2005). Youth mentoring: Theory, research, and practice. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.) Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 2–11). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. DuBois, D. L., Burk-Braxton, C., Swenson, L. P., Tevendale, H. D., Lockerd, E. M., & Moran, B. J. (2002a). Getting by with a little help from self and others: Self-esteem and social support as resources during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 38, 822–839.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DuBois, D. L., Felner, R. D., Brand, S., Phillips, R. S. C., & Lease, M. A. (1996). Early adolescent self-esteem: A developmental-ecological framework and assessment strategy. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 543–579.Google Scholar
  13. DuBois, D. L., Felner, R. D., Sherman, M. D., & Bull, C. A. (1994). Socio-environmental experiences, self-esteem, and emotional/behavioral problems in early adolescence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 371–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002b). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 157–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DuBois, D. L., Neville, H. A., Parra, G. R., & Pugh-Lilly, A. O. (2002c). Testing a new model of mentoring. In J. E. Rhodes (Ed.) A critical view of youth mentoring, (Vol. 93, pp. 21–57). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Elliott, S. N., Gresham, F. M., Freeman, T., & McCloskey, G. (1988). Teacher and observer ratings of children’s social skills: Validation of the social skills rating scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 6, 152–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.Google Scholar
  18. Grossman, J. B. (2005). Evaluating mentoring programs. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.) Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 251–265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 199–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen, K. (2005). School-based mentoring study phase 1 report 2003–2004 school year: Effective practices. Philadelphia: Big Brothers Big Sisters.Google Scholar
  21. Henrich, C. C., Brookmeyer, K. A., & Shahar, G. (2005). Weapon violence in adolescence: Parent and school connectedness as protective factors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 306–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herrera, C. L., Sipe, W. S., & McClanahan, Z. (2000). Mentoring school-age children: Relationship development in community-based and school-based programs. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  23. Huston, A. C., Duncan, G. J., Granger, R., Bos, J., McLoyd, V., Mistry, R., et al. (2001). Work-based antipoverty programs for parents can enhance the school performance and social behavior of children. Child Development, 72, 318–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalaian, S. A. (2003). Meta-analysis methods for synthesizing treatment effects in multisite studies: Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) perspective. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(15). Retrieved June 28, 2007 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=15.
  25. Karcher, M. J. (2003). The Hemingway: Measure of adolescent connectedness: Validation studies. ERIC no. ED477969; ERIC/CASS no. CG032433. Retrieved February 28, 2005 from http://www.adolescentconnectedness.com
  26. Karcher, M. J. (2004). Connectedness and school violence: A framework for developmental interventions. In E. R. Gerler Jr. (Ed.) Handbook of school violence (pp. 7–39). New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  27. Karcher, M. J. (2005). The effects of school-based developmental mentoring and mentors’ attendance on mentees’ self-esteem, behavior, and connectedness. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karcher, M. J., Davis, C., & Powell, B. (2002). Developmental mentoring in the schools: Testing connectedness as a mediating variable in the promotion of academic achievement. The School Community Journal, 12, 36–52.Google Scholar
  29. Karcher, M. J., & Finn, L. (2005). How connectedness contributes to experimental smoking among rural youth: Developmental and ecological analyses. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 25–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karcher, M. J., Kuperminc, G., Portwood, S., Sipe, C., & Taylor, A. (2006). Mentoring programs: A framework to inform program development, research, and evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 709–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King, K., Vidourek, R., Davis, B., & McClellan, W. (2002). Increasing self-esteem and school connectedness through a multidimensional mentoring program. Journal of School Health, 72, 294–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuperminc, G., Emshoff, J. G., Reiner, M. N., Secrest, L. A., Niolon, P., & Foster, J. D. (2005). Integration of mentoring with other programs and services. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.) Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 314–334). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Marshall, S. (2001). Do I matter? Construct validation of adolescents’ perceived mattering to parents and friends. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 473–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership. (2004). $450 million dollars for mentoring: Issue brief. Retrieved July 18, 2004, from http://www.mentoring.org/take_action/hot_issues/president/index.adp.
  35. Portwood, S. G., & Ayers, P. M. (2005). Schools. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.) Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 336–347). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Procidano, M., & Heller, K. (1983). Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: Three validation studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 1–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Rhodes, J. E., & Davis, A. B. (1996). Supportive ties between nonparent adults and urban adolescent girls. In B. J. Leadbeater & N. Way (Eds.) Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 213–225). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rhodes, J. E., Grossman, J. B., & Resch, N. L. (2000). Agents of change: Pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents’ academic adjustment. Child Development, 71, 1662–1671.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanchez, B., & Colon, Y. (2005). Race, ethnicity, and culture in mentoring relationships. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.) Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 251–265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Sanchez, B., Colon, Y., & Esparza, P. (2005). The role of a sense of school belonging and gender in the academic achievement of Latino adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 619–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanchez, B., & Reyes, O. (1999). Descriptive profile of the mentorship relationships of Latino adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shorey, H. S., Snyder, C. R., Yang, X., & Lewin, M. R. (2003). The role of hope as a mediator in recollected parenting, adult attachment, and mental health. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 22, 685–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sipe, C. L., & Roder, A. E. (1999). Mentoring school-age children: A classification of programs. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  46. Snyder, C. R., Hoza, B., Pelham, W. E., Rapoff, M., Ware, L., Danovsky, M., et al. (1997). The development and validation of the Children’s Hope Scale. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22, 399–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Snyder, C. R., Lopez, S. J., Shorey, H. S., Rand, K. L., & Feldman, D. B. (2003). Hope theory, measurements, and applications to school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stuart, D. L., Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1991). Teacher ratings of social skills in popular and rejected males and females. School Psychology Quarterly, 6, 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomas, S. P., & Smith, H. (2004). School connectedness, anger behaviors, and relationships of violent and nonviolent American youth. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 40, 135–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., Han, S. S., Granger, D. A., & Morton, T. (1995). Effects of psychotherapy with children and adolescents revisited: A meta-analysis of treatment outcome studies. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 450–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Counseling and Educational PsychologyUniversity of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations