Prevention Science

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 249–260 | Cite as

A Randomized Trial of Parents Who Care: Effects on Key Outcomes at 24-month Follow-up

  • Kevin P. HaggertyEmail author
  • Martie L. Skinner
  • Elizabeth P. MacKenzie
  • Richard F. Catalano


This study was designed to test the efficacy of Parents Who Care© (PWC), a seven-session universal prevention program which includes parenting, youth, and family components designed to prevent substance use and other problem behaviors. Using an intent-to-treat experimental design, this study tests the program efficacy across race within a balanced sample of European American (EA) and African American (AA) youth and their parents (n = 331 n AA = 163; n EA = 168). Families were recruited, randomly assigned to three conditions (group-administered [PA], self-administered with telephone support [SA], and no-treatment control) and the intervention was administered when the adolescents were in the eighth grade. Analyses on key teen outcomes of the Parents Who Care program at 24-month follow-up are reported here and include perceptions of drug use harm; favorable attitudes about drug use; delinquent and violent behavior; and initiation into cigarette, alcohol, other drug use, or sexual activity. Repeated measures mixed model regressions found no effect of the intervention on rate of change in attitudes about drug use or frequency of delinquent or violent behavior. Regression analyses with multiple imputations for missing data detected group differences in means at 24-month follow-up. Both program formats reduced favorable attitudes toward drug use among youth (SA d = 0.39, PA d = 0.22); and AA youth in the self-administered intervention reported significantly less violent behavior than their control counterparts (d = 0.45). No effects were found for drug use harm or delinquency. Finally, logistic regression predicting a combined outcome measure of initiation of alcohol, tobacco, drug use, and/or sexual activity found AA youth in both the group- and self-administered intervention conditions significantly less likely to initiate substance use and/or sexual activity than those in the control condition. Odds ratios indicated the chances of initiating sex or substance use were reduced by almost 70% (OR = 0.31) for AA teens in the SA condition compared to controls, and 75% (OR = 0.25) for the AA teens in the PA compared to controls.


Parent training Self-administered Prevention trial 



This paper was supported by Grant # R01-DA121645-05 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. We wish to thank the Seattle School District for their collaboration in this study.


  1. Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglioni, A. J., Jr. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities That Care youth survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachman, J. G., Wadsworth, K. N., O’Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., & Schulenberg, J. E. (1997). Smoking, drinking, and drug use in young adulthood: The impacts of new freedoms and new responsibilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauman, K. E., Ennett, S. T., Foshee, V. A., Pemberton, M., King, T. S., & Koch, G. G. (2000). Influence of a family-directed program on adolescent cigarette and alcohol cessation. Prevention Science, 1, 227–237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernal, G., & Scharrón-Del-Río, M. R. (2001). Are empirically supported treatments valid for ethnic minorities? Toward an alternative approach for treatment research. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7, 328–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biglan, A., & Metzler, C. W. (1998). A public health perspective for research on family-focused interventions. In R. S. Ashery, E. B. Robertson, & K. L. Kumpfer (Eds.) Drug abuse prevention through family interventions. NIDA Research Monograph No. 177 (pp. 430–458). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  7. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Botvin, E. M., & Diaz, T. (1995). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1106–1112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brody, G. H., McBride Murry, V., Chen, Y.-F., Kogan, S. M., & Brown, A. C. (2006). Effects of family risk factors on dosage and efficacy of a family-centered preventive intervention for rural African Americans. Prevention Science, 7, 281–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.) Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dumka, L. E., Garza, C. A., Roosa, M. W., & Stoerzinger, H. D. (1997). Recruitment and retention of high-risk families into a preventive parent training intervention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dumka, L. E., Gonzales, N., Wood, J. L., & Formoso, D. (1998). Using qualitative methods to develop contextually relevant measures and preventive interventions: An illustration. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 605–637.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Strycker, L. A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (2002). Family-based crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. P. Farrington, B. C. Welsh, & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.) Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 22–55). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., et al. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6, 151–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forehand, R., & Kotchick, B. A. (1996). Cultural diversity: A wake-up call for parent training. Behavior Therapy, 27, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foxcroft, D., Ireland, D., Lister-Sharp, D., Lowe, G., & Breen, R. (2003). Longer-term primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people: A systematic review. Addiction, 98, 397–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haggerty, K. P., MacKenzie, E. P., Skinner, M. L., Harachi, T. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2006). Participation in “Parents Who Care”: Predicting program initiation and exposure in two different program formats. Journal of Primary Prevention, 27, 47–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haggerty, K. P., MacKenzie, E. P., Skinner, M. L., Roberson, K. C., Harachi, T. W., & Catalano, R. (under review). Self-administered parenting programs to promote adolescent behavioral health: A review and promising developments.Google Scholar
  19. Hallfors, D., Cho, H., Sanchez, V., Khatapoush, S., Kim, H. M., & Bauer, D. (2006). Efficacy vs effectiveness trial results of an indicated “model” substance abuse program: Implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 2254–2259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2002). Investing in your communitys youth: An introduction to the Communities That Care system. South Deerfield, MA: Channing Bete.Google Scholar
  21. Hawkins, J. D., & Weis, J. G. (1985). The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 6, 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Jones, G., & Fine, D. N. (1987). Delinquency prevention through parent training: Results and issues from work in progress. In J. Q. Wilson & G. C. Loury (Ed.) From children to citizens: Vol. III. Families, schools, and delinquency prevention (pp. 186–204). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. G. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 226–234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hoard, D., & Shepard, K. N. (2005). Parent education as parent-centered prevention: A review of school-related outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 434–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kadzin, A. E., & Wassell, G. (1998). Treatment completion and therapeutic change among children referred for outpatient therapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 332–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumpfer, K. L., & Alvarado, R. (2003). Family-strengthening approaches for the prevention of youth problem behaviors. American Psychologist, 58, 457–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mason, W. A., Kosterman, R., Haggerty, K. P., Hawkins, J. D., Redmond, C., Spoth, R. L., et al. (under review). Moderation and mediation of the effect of a family-focused substance use preventive intervention on young adult alcohol abuse. Google Scholar
  29. Mason, W. A., Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Haggerty, K. P., & Spoth, R. L. (2003). Reducing adolescents’ growth in substance use and delinquency: Randomized trial effects of a preventive parent-training intervention. Prevention Science, 4, 203–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach. American Sociological Review, 47, 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matsueda, R. L. (1988). The current state of differential association theory. Crime and Delinquency, 34, 277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meek, J., Lillehoj, C. J., Welsh, J., & Spoth, R. (2004). Rural community partnership recruitment for an evidence-based family-focused prevention program: The PROSPER Project. Rural Mental Health, 29, 23–28.Google Scholar
  33. Needle, R., McCubbin, H. I., Lorence, J., & Hochhauser, M. (1983). Reliability and validity of adolescent self-reported drug use in a family-based study: A methodological report. International Journal of the Addictions, 18, 901–912.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Patterson, G. R., Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (1982). A comparative evaluation of a parent-training program. Behavior Therapy, 13, 638–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pollard, J. A. (1998). Final report on NIDA SBIR grant #DA07435, Risk focused family training for drug use intervention. Seattle, WA: Developmental Research and Programs.Google Scholar
  36. Reyno, S. M., & McGrath, P. J. (2006). Predictors of parent training efficacy for child externalizing behavior problems—A meta-analytic review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 99–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sanders, M. R., Turner, K. M. T., & Markie-Dadds, C. (2002). The development and dissemination of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A multilevel, evidence-based system of parenting and family support. Prevention Science, 3, 173–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SAS Institute (2001). The SAS system for Windows (Version 8.02). Cary, NC: Author.Google Scholar
  39. SAS Institute (2002a). SAS/STAT Software, Version 8.2: The MI Procedure. SAS Institute Inc. Retrieved December 12, 2002, from
  40. SAS Institute (2002b). SAS/STAT Software, Version 8.2: The MIANALYZE Procedure. SAS Institute Inc. Retrieved December 12, 2002, from
  41. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Goldman, M. S. (1995). Self-reported drinking and alcohol-related problems among early adolescents: Dimensionality and validity over 24 months. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56, 383–394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Snell-Johns, J., Mendez, J. L., & Smith, B. H. (2004). Evidence-based solutions for overcoming access barriers, decreasing attrition, and promoting change with underserved families. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 19–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Haggerty, K., & Ward, T. (1995). A controlled parenting skills outcome study examining individual difference and attendance effects. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2001). Randomized trial of brief family interventions for general populations: Adolescent substance use outcomes 4 years following baseline. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 627–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Surgeon General (2000). Mental health: Culture, race and ethnicity: A supplement to mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. Retrieved January 10, 2005 from http:///
  47. Sutherland, E. H. (1973). Development of the theory [Private paper published posthumously]. In K. Schuessler (Ed.) Edwin Sutherland on analyzing crime (pp. 13–29). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tremblay, R. E., Masse, L. C., Pagani, L., & Vitaro, F. (1996). From childhood physical aggression to adolescent maladjustment: The Montreal prevention experiment. In R. D. Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.) Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse and delinquency (pp. 268–298). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Weisz, J. R., Sandler, I. N., Durlak, J. A., & Anton, B. S. (2005). Promoting and protecting youth mental health through evidence-based prevention and treatment. American Psychologist, 60, 628–648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Prevention Research 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin P. Haggerty
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martie L. Skinner
    • 1
  • Elizabeth P. MacKenzie
    • 1
  • Richard F. Catalano
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Development Research GroupUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations