Prevention Science

, 8:89 | Cite as

A Biosocial-Affect Model of Adolescent Sensation Seeking: The Role of Affect Evaluation and Peer-Group Influence in Adolescent Drug Use

  • Daniel RomerEmail author
  • Michael Hennessy
Original Paper


Adolescence is a period of heightened experimentation with risky behavior. Models of brain development suggest that this phenomenon is partly the result of increased adolescent sensation seeking unaccompanied by maturation in ability to evaluate risks. We test an alternative biosocial-affect model in which favorable affect attached to behavior leads to discounting of risks. Although the model applies to both adolescents and adults, it predicts that the surge in sensation seeking during adolescence increases affective attraction to risky behavior, reduces perceived risk of the behavior, and results in peer-group reinforcement of these effects. We estimated models that included these influences for three drugs (tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana) in a national sample of youth ages 14 to 22. Consistent with brain maturation models, sensation seeking rose during the age period under study with girls peaking earlier than boys. Nevertheless, independent of age or gender, the biosocial-affect model explained the relation between sensation seeking and drug use. The findings indicate that although adolescents recognize the risks of drug use, they are subject to both biological and social influences that encourage risk taking. Implications for the prevention of risky adolescent behavior are discussed.


Adolescents Drug use Sensation seeking Affect heuristic 


  1. Arnett, J. J. (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12, 339–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audrain-Mcgovern, J., Rodriguez, D., & Moss, H. B. (2003). Smoking progression and physical activity. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention , 12, 1121–1129.Google Scholar
  3. Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M. (1990). Explaining the recent decline in cocaine use among young adults: Further evidence that perceived risks and disapproval lead to reduced drug use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 31, 173–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M. (1998). Explaining recent increases in students’ marijuana use: Impacts of perceived risks and disapproval, 1976 through 1996. American Journal of Public Health , 88(6), 887–892.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 61–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). The social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Bentler, P. M. (2004). EQS 6 Structural equation manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Chambers, R. A., Taylor, J. R., & Potenza, M. N. (2003). Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: A critical period of addiction vulnerability. American Journal of Psychiatry , 160(6), 1041–1052.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dackis, C., & O’Brien, C. (2005). Neurobiology of addiction: Treatment and public policy ramifications. Nature Neuroscience , 8(11), 1431–1436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donohew, R. L., Hoyle, R., Clayton, R., Skinner, W., Colon, S., & Rice, R. (1999). Sensation seeking and drug use by adolescents and their friends: Models for marijuana and alcohol. Journal of Studies on Alcohol , 60(5), 622–631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A. S., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 13, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fishbein M. (1997). Predicting, understanding, and changing socially relevant behaviors: Lessons learnt. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology (pp. 177–191). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Fishbein, M. (2003). Toward an understanding of the role of perceived risk in HIV prevention research. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 49–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  15. Fuster, J. M. (2002). Frontal lobe and cognitive development. Journal of Neurocytology , 31, 373–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giedd, J. N. (2004). Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Science , 1021, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N. O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., et al. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience , 2(10), 861–863.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gullone, E., Moore, S., Moss, S., & Boyd, C. (2000). The adolescent risk-taking questionnaire: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Adolescent Research , 15(2), 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hornik R., Maklan, D., Cadell, D., Barmada, C. B., Jacobsohn, L. & Prado, A. (2002). Evaluation of the national youth anti-drug media campaign: Fifth semi-annual report of findings. Rockville, MD: Westat.Google Scholar
  20. Hoyle, R. H., Stephenson, M. T., Palmgreen, P., Lorch, E. P., & Donohew, L. (2002). Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences , 32, 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76–99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Jamieson, P. E., & Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2006). Do films about mentally disturbed characters promote ineffective coping in vulnerable youth? Journal of Adolescence, 29, 749–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnston, L. (2003). Alcohol and illicit drugs: The role of risk perceptions. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 56–74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar
  24. Johnston, L. O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2004). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2003. Vol. I: Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 04-5507). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  25. Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Krawczyk, D. (2002). Contributions of the prefrontal cortex to the neural basis of human decision making. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews , 26, 631–664.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin , 127, 267–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Millstein, S. G., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2002). Perceptions of risk and vulnerability. Journal of Adolescent Health , 31S, 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review , 100, 674–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson, C. A., Bloom, F. E., Cameron, J. L., Amaral, D., & Pine, D. (2002). An integrative, multidisciplinary approach to the study of brain-behavior relations in the context of typical and atypical development. Development and Psychopathology , 14, 499–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pate, R. R., Heath, G. W., Dowda, M., & Trost, S. G. (1996). Associations between physical activity and other health behaviors in a representative sample of US adolescents. American Journal of Public Health , 86(11), 1577–1581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quadrel, M. J., Fischhoff, B., & Davis, W. (1993). Adolescent (in)vulnerability. American Psychologist , 48(2), 102–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rather, B. C., & Goldman, M. S. (1994). Drinking-related differences in the memory organization of alcohol expectancies. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology , 2, 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberti, J. W. (2004). A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. Journal of Research in Personality , 38, 256–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodgers, J. L. (2003). EMOSA sexuality models, memes, and the tipping point: Policy and program implications. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 185–192). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rolison, M. R., & Scherman, A. (2002). Factors influencing adolescents’ decisions to engage in risk-taking behavior. Adolescence , 37, 585–596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Romer, D. (2003). Prospects for an integrated approach to adolescent risk reduction. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 1–8). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar
  41. Romer, D., & Jamieson, P. (2001). The role of perceived risk in starting and stopping smoking. In P. Slovic (Ed.), Smoking: Risk, perception, and policy (pp. 64–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar
  42. Romer, D., & Stanton, B. (2003). Feelings about risk and the epidemic diffusion of adolescent sexual behavior. Prevention Science , 4(1), 39–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sallis, J. F., Prochaska, J. J., & Taylor, W. C. (2000). A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise , 32(5), 963–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shafer, J., & Brown, S. A. (1991). Marijuana and cocaine effect expectancies and drug use patterns. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 59, 558–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Short, L., & Hennessy, M. (2004). Using structural equations to estimate the effects of behavioral interventions. Structural Equation Modeling , 1, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Slovic, P. (2001). Cigarette smokers: Rational actors or rational fools? In P. Slovic (Ed.), Smoking: Risk, perception, and policy (pp. 97–126). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar
  47. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Intuitive judgment: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Smith, A. M. A., & Rosenthal, D. (1995). Adolescents’ perceptions of their risk environment. Journal of Adolescence , 18, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., Tessner, K. D., & Toga, A. W. (2001). Mapping continued brain growth and gray matter density reduction in dorsal frontal cortex: Inverse relationships during postadolescent brain maturation. The Journal of Neuroscience , 2(22), 8819–8829.Google Scholar
  50. Spear, L. P. (2000). The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews , 24, 417–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stephenson, M. T., Hoyle, R. H., Palmgreen, P., & Slater, M. D. (2003). Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence , 72, 279–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sutoo, D. E., & Akiyama, K. (1996). The mechanism by which exercise modifies brain function. Physiology and Behavior , 60, 177–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wallace, J. M., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., Cooper, S. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2003). Gender and ethnic differences in smoking, drinking and illicit drug use among American 8th, 10th and 12th grade students, 1976–2000. Addiction , 98, 225–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yanovitzky, I. (2005). Sensation seeking and adolescent drug use: The mediating role of association with deviant peers and pro-drug discussions. Health Communication , 17(1), 67–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yanovitzky, I. (2006). Sensation seeking and alcohol use by college students: Examining multiple pathways of effects. Journal of Health Communication , 11, 269–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Normal theory based statistics in structural equation modeling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 51, 289–309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological methodology 2000 (pp. 165–200). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  58. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist , 35, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 10(6), 224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zuckerman M., Eysenck S., & Eysenck H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural age and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 46, 139–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Zuckerman, M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (2000). Personality and risk taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality , 68, 999–1029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Prevention Research 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adolescent Risk Communication Institute, Annenberg Public Policy CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations